Optimal patient positioning for spinal anesthesia using a visual aid in cesarean section patients: A randomized control trial

Shubha V. Hegde, Archana Shivashankar, K. Nalini, Ashwini Turai
{"title":"Optimal patient positioning for spinal anesthesia using a visual aid in cesarean section patients: A randomized control trial","authors":"Shubha V. Hegde, Archana Shivashankar, K. Nalini, Ashwini Turai","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_42_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Spinal anesthesia is the safest technique of anesthesia in parturients for cesarean section. Usually, patients are instructed verbally to acquire the ideal position for spinal anesthesia, but there can be difficulty in attaining the best position if patients fail to understand the verbal command, which will lead to detainment in accomplishing the technique and increased possibility of patient’s dissatisfaction. Hence, in our study, we hypothesized that using photographs with verbal commands would reduce the time taken for spinal needle placement, reduce the total number of skin pricks, and improve the success at the first attempt.\n \n \n \n One hundred and eleven pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section were divided into Group C (only verbal instructions were given) and Group V (visual aid and verbal instructions were given). Time taken for successful spinal needle placement was noted in seconds and summarized in terms of median and interquartile range. Number of skin punctures, intervertebral spaces attempted, and first-pass success were determined in terms of percentage. Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to compare the above parameters between the two groups.\n \n \n \n There was significant reduction in the time taken for spinal needle placement in Group V compared to the control group. There was significant improvement in first-pass success rate and reduction in the number of skin pricks and intervertebral spaces attempted in Group V.\n \n \n \n Use of visual aid with verbal commands helps in better understanding of positioning, thus improving the first-pass success significantly. It also reduces the duration for successful spinal needle placement, number of skin pricks, and intervertebral spaces attempted.\n","PeriodicalId":508221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"13 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_42_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spinal anesthesia is the safest technique of anesthesia in parturients for cesarean section. Usually, patients are instructed verbally to acquire the ideal position for spinal anesthesia, but there can be difficulty in attaining the best position if patients fail to understand the verbal command, which will lead to detainment in accomplishing the technique and increased possibility of patient’s dissatisfaction. Hence, in our study, we hypothesized that using photographs with verbal commands would reduce the time taken for spinal needle placement, reduce the total number of skin pricks, and improve the success at the first attempt. One hundred and eleven pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section were divided into Group C (only verbal instructions were given) and Group V (visual aid and verbal instructions were given). Time taken for successful spinal needle placement was noted in seconds and summarized in terms of median and interquartile range. Number of skin punctures, intervertebral spaces attempted, and first-pass success were determined in terms of percentage. Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to compare the above parameters between the two groups. There was significant reduction in the time taken for spinal needle placement in Group V compared to the control group. There was significant improvement in first-pass success rate and reduction in the number of skin pricks and intervertebral spaces attempted in Group V. Use of visual aid with verbal commands helps in better understanding of positioning, thus improving the first-pass success significantly. It also reduces the duration for successful spinal needle placement, number of skin pricks, and intervertebral spaces attempted.
剖腹产患者使用视觉辅助工具进行脊髓麻醉时的最佳患者定位:随机对照试验
脊髓麻醉是剖宫产产妇最安全的麻醉技术。通常情况下,患者会在口头指导下获得脊髓麻醉的理想体位,但如果患者无法理解口头指令,就很难获得最佳体位,这将导致患者无法完成技术,并增加患者不满意的可能性。因此,在我们的研究中,我们假设使用照片配合口头指令可以缩短脊髓穿刺针置入的时间,减少皮肤刺入的总次数,并提高首次尝试的成功率。 111 名接受择期剖腹产手术的孕妇被分为 C 组(仅提供口头指导)和 V 组(提供视觉辅助和口头指导)。以秒为单位记录成功置入脊髓针所需的时间,并以中位数和四分位数间距进行总结。皮肤穿刺次数、尝试的椎间隙数和首次穿刺成功率按百分比计算。采用皮尔逊卡方检验比较两组患者的上述参数。 与对照组相比,第五组的脊髓穿刺针置入时间明显缩短。使用视觉辅助工具和口头指令有助于更好地理解定位,从而大大提高了首次穿刺的成功率。它还缩短了脊髓穿刺针成功放置的时间,减少了皮肤穿刺次数和椎间隙尝试次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信