Aircraft vulnerability to politically motivated Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) in Eastern Europe

Tegg Westbrook
{"title":"Aircraft vulnerability to politically motivated Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) in Eastern Europe","authors":"Tegg Westbrook","doi":"10.35467/sdq/178249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Countries in Europe have experienced radio frequency interference from Russian electronic warfare units, affecting navigation systems without discrimination. Interference has been identified as coming from the Russian mainland, Kaliningrad, and in the areas where it is engaged in conflicts abroad, creating serious hazards for aircraft. Previous research has identified the technical vulnerabilities to aviation from radio frequency interference, but it has yet to be contextualised in light of the ongoing geopolitical tensions. Using literature review analysis, the aim of the article is to place the jamming and spoofing threat in the context of ongoing political tensions between Russia and the region and to establish worse-case scenarios based on the former’s motives. Focusing on the threats to aircraft, it finds that the likely motivations are to (1) complement political narratives of Western aggression; (2) to deny service for intimidation, harassment, economic loss, and to portray a dominant Russian cyber influence; and (3) to use spoofing to enable hostage diplomacy via the seizure of people and assets. It argues that reporting mechanisms for aviation risks assumes geographical staticism, which does not correspond adequately to the threat. It also creates arbitrary “predictability” in otherwise unpredictable environments, which could ultimately affect vigilance and due diligence in the areas not considered problematic.","PeriodicalId":52940,"journal":{"name":"Security and Defence Quarterly","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Security and Defence Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/178249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Countries in Europe have experienced radio frequency interference from Russian electronic warfare units, affecting navigation systems without discrimination. Interference has been identified as coming from the Russian mainland, Kaliningrad, and in the areas where it is engaged in conflicts abroad, creating serious hazards for aircraft. Previous research has identified the technical vulnerabilities to aviation from radio frequency interference, but it has yet to be contextualised in light of the ongoing geopolitical tensions. Using literature review analysis, the aim of the article is to place the jamming and spoofing threat in the context of ongoing political tensions between Russia and the region and to establish worse-case scenarios based on the former’s motives. Focusing on the threats to aircraft, it finds that the likely motivations are to (1) complement political narratives of Western aggression; (2) to deny service for intimidation, harassment, economic loss, and to portray a dominant Russian cyber influence; and (3) to use spoofing to enable hostage diplomacy via the seizure of people and assets. It argues that reporting mechanisms for aviation risks assumes geographical staticism, which does not correspond adequately to the threat. It also creates arbitrary “predictability” in otherwise unpredictable environments, which could ultimately affect vigilance and due diligence in the areas not considered problematic.
在东欧,飞机易受出于政治动机的射频干扰(RFI)的影响
欧洲各国受到俄罗斯电子战部队的无线电频率干扰,导航系统无一幸免。已确定干扰来自俄罗斯本土、加里宁格勒以及俄罗斯参与海外冲突的地区,对飞机造成严重危害。以往的研究已经确定了无线电频率干扰对航空技术的影响,但尚未结合当前的地缘政治紧张局势进行分析。本文通过文献综述分析,旨在将干扰和欺骗威胁置于俄罗斯与该地区持续的政治紧张局势背景下,并根据前者的动机确定更坏的情况。该研究重点关注对飞机的威胁,发现其可能的动机是:(1) 补充西方侵略的政治论调;(2) 拒绝提供服务以进行恐吓、骚扰、造成经济损失,并描绘俄罗斯的主导网络影响力;(3) 利用欺骗手段通过扣押人员和资产实现人质外交。报告认为,航空风险报告机制假定了地理上的静态性,这与威胁并不完全相符。它还在原本不可预测的环境中制造了任意的 "可预测性",最终可能会影响到在不被认为有问题的领域的警惕性和尽职调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信