Comparison of CFD-DEM and MP-PIC in the Simulation of Metal Powder Conveying for Laser Metal Deposition

L. Pedrolli, Beatriz Achiaga Menor, Inger Martinez de Arenaza, Alejandro López
{"title":"Comparison of CFD-DEM and MP-PIC in the Simulation of Metal Powder Conveying for Laser Metal Deposition","authors":"L. Pedrolli, Beatriz Achiaga Menor, Inger Martinez de Arenaza, Alejandro López","doi":"10.51560/ofj.v4.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pneumatic conveying of fine powders is essential for many industrial processes, including Laser Metal Deposition (LMD), a Direct Metal Additive Manufacturing (DMAM) technology that builds solid objects layer-by-layer using a laser to melt metal powder. To optimize the process, it is necessary to have a correct understanding of the powder’s behaviour under the process condition. The coupled Computational Fluid Dynamics - Discrete Element Modelling (CFD-DEM) and MultiPhase - Particle In Cell (MP-PIC) are two popular Eulerian-Lagrangian models to simulate particle laden flows. This study compares them to analyse powder behaviour in a small channel of LMD machines. Results from the two methods differ significantly, with CFD-DEM offering a more accurate representation of the physical reality, while MP-PIC is more computationally efficient. The study finds that the CFD-DEM method produces higher fluctuations in the solids flow rate due to the formation of particle clusters, while MP-PIC displays a smooth and essentially uniform flow. The results suggest that CFD-DEM should be used for more accurate and detailed studies of solids flow rate in pneumatic conveying systems, while MP-PIC can be used for preliminary studies and design optimization.","PeriodicalId":252778,"journal":{"name":"OpenFOAM® Journal","volume":"132 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OpenFOAM® Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51560/ofj.v4.91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pneumatic conveying of fine powders is essential for many industrial processes, including Laser Metal Deposition (LMD), a Direct Metal Additive Manufacturing (DMAM) technology that builds solid objects layer-by-layer using a laser to melt metal powder. To optimize the process, it is necessary to have a correct understanding of the powder’s behaviour under the process condition. The coupled Computational Fluid Dynamics - Discrete Element Modelling (CFD-DEM) and MultiPhase - Particle In Cell (MP-PIC) are two popular Eulerian-Lagrangian models to simulate particle laden flows. This study compares them to analyse powder behaviour in a small channel of LMD machines. Results from the two methods differ significantly, with CFD-DEM offering a more accurate representation of the physical reality, while MP-PIC is more computationally efficient. The study finds that the CFD-DEM method produces higher fluctuations in the solids flow rate due to the formation of particle clusters, while MP-PIC displays a smooth and essentially uniform flow. The results suggest that CFD-DEM should be used for more accurate and detailed studies of solids flow rate in pneumatic conveying systems, while MP-PIC can be used for preliminary studies and design optimization.
CFD-DEM 与 MP-PIC 在激光金属沉积金属粉末输送模拟中的比较
精细粉末的气力输送对于许多工业工艺都至关重要,其中包括激光金属沉积(LMD)技术,这是一种直接金属添加制造(DMAM)技术,利用激光熔化金属粉末,逐层制造固体物体。要优化工艺,就必须正确理解粉末在工艺条件下的行为。耦合计算流体动力学-离散元建模(CFD-DEM)和多相-颗粒单元(MP-PIC)是两种常用的欧拉-拉格朗日模型,用于模拟颗粒载流。本研究对它们进行了比较,以分析 LMD 机器小通道中的粉末行为。两种方法的结果差异很大,CFD-DEM 能更准确地反映物理现实,而 MP-PIC 的计算效率更高。研究发现,CFD-DEM 方法会因颗粒团的形成而产生较大的固体流速波动,而 MP-PIC 则显示出平滑且基本均匀的流动。研究结果表明,在对气力输送系统中的固体流速进行更精确、更详细的研究时,应采用 CFD-DEM 方法,而 MP-PIC 可用于初步研究和优化设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信