How differently elementary students and undergraduates of elementary teacher education university coordinate experiment evidence and theory

Myeong-Kyeong Shin
{"title":"How differently elementary students and undergraduates of elementary teacher education university coordinate experiment evidence and theory","authors":"Myeong-Kyeong Shin","doi":"10.29333/ijese/14201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to explore how differently elementary students and their future teachers, pre-service elementary teachers dealt with evidence and theory by analyzing their journal entries for a science inquiry activity. Pre-service teachers took a science inquiry course and worked with self-directed inquiry by using Korean science elementary textbook. After inquiry activities, they provided science journals including their test question, data and claims on their inquiry. At the same time, elementary 4th grade students worked on science inquiry during their class with the same topics of the pre-service teachers. The collected science journals with three topics from both pre-service teachers and 4th graders were analyzed for the study. The journals of 79 from pre-service teachers and 54 from elementary students were compared in terms of quality of question and usage of evidence as well as characterizing types of coordination between evidence and theory. It was followed by discussion regarding the direction of pre-service teacher education of teaching science in elementary school as well.","PeriodicalId":495938,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary journal of environmental and science education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary journal of environmental and science education","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/14201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to explore how differently elementary students and their future teachers, pre-service elementary teachers dealt with evidence and theory by analyzing their journal entries for a science inquiry activity. Pre-service teachers took a science inquiry course and worked with self-directed inquiry by using Korean science elementary textbook. After inquiry activities, they provided science journals including their test question, data and claims on their inquiry. At the same time, elementary 4th grade students worked on science inquiry during their class with the same topics of the pre-service teachers. The collected science journals with three topics from both pre-service teachers and 4th graders were analyzed for the study. The journals of 79 from pre-service teachers and 54 from elementary students were compared in terms of quality of question and usage of evidence as well as characterizing types of coordination between evidence and theory. It was followed by discussion regarding the direction of pre-service teacher education of teaching science in elementary school as well.
小学教师教育大学的小学生和本科生如何以不同方式协调实验证据和理论
本研究旨在通过分析小学生和他们未来的教师,即职前小学教师在科学探究活动中的日志记录,探讨他们是如何以不同的方式处理证据和理论的。职前教师参加了科学探究课程,并使用韩国小学科学教科书进行自主探究。探究活动结束后,他们提供了科学日记,其中包括他们的试题、数据和探究主张。与此同时,小学四年级学生也在课堂上进行了科学探究,主题与职前教师相同。本研究对收集到的职前教师和四年级学生三个主题的科学日记进行了分析。从问题的质量、证据的使用以及证据与理论之间的协调类型等方面对 79 名职前教师和 54 名小学生的日志进行了比较。随后还讨论了小学科学教学的职前教师教育方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信