Does the American Foregut Society Endoscopic Classification of Esophago-gastric Junction Integrity Predict Acid Reflux and Esophago-gastric Junction Disruption?

Stefano Siboni, Marco Sozzi, Alessia Kersik, A. Lovece, P. Milito, Fedra Menikou, Luigi Bonavina, Caterina Froiio, Daniele Bernardi, E. Asti
{"title":"Does the American Foregut Society Endoscopic Classification of Esophago-gastric Junction Integrity Predict Acid Reflux and Esophago-gastric Junction Disruption?","authors":"Stefano Siboni, Marco Sozzi, Alessia Kersik, A. Lovece, P. Milito, Fedra Menikou, Luigi Bonavina, Caterina Froiio, Daniele Bernardi, E. Asti","doi":"10.1177/26345161241230940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is usually associated with disruption of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). The endoscopic Hill classification has proven to be inadequate to assess EGJ integrity. Recently, the American Foregut Society (AFS) developed an endoscopic classification focused on hiatal hernia (L), hiatal opening (D), and the flap valve (F). While pH-monitoring remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of GERD, high-resolution manometry (HRM) can assess EGJ anatomy and competency. Aim of this study is to validate the AFS classification in patients with suspected GERD assessing its accuracy in predicting EGJ disruption and pathologic reflux. We prospectively enrolled patients with suspected GERD who underwent upper endoscopy, HRM and pH-study between November 2022 and March 2023. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed. The efficacy of the AFS classification in predicting GERD (acid exposure time, AET > 6%) was assessed. Each component of the classification was compared with the corresponding HRM variable. Among 56 patients (48% men, BMI 23.5 kg/m2, age 43 years), an AET > 6% was found in 22 (39%), and in 0% of patients with AFS grade I, 5.9% with grade II, 52% with grade III and 77.8% with grade IV ( P < .001). The L component effectively predicted the EGJ type, the D the EGJ-Contractile Integral, while the absence of the flap valve was related to a positive Straight Leg Raise maneuver. The new grading system is able to stratify patients with pathologic GERD. Moreover, the single components of the AFS classification are associated with manometric markers of EGJ disruption.","PeriodicalId":508891,"journal":{"name":"Foregut: The Journal of the American Foregut Society","volume":"86 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foregut: The Journal of the American Foregut Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26345161241230940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is usually associated with disruption of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). The endoscopic Hill classification has proven to be inadequate to assess EGJ integrity. Recently, the American Foregut Society (AFS) developed an endoscopic classification focused on hiatal hernia (L), hiatal opening (D), and the flap valve (F). While pH-monitoring remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of GERD, high-resolution manometry (HRM) can assess EGJ anatomy and competency. Aim of this study is to validate the AFS classification in patients with suspected GERD assessing its accuracy in predicting EGJ disruption and pathologic reflux. We prospectively enrolled patients with suspected GERD who underwent upper endoscopy, HRM and pH-study between November 2022 and March 2023. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed. The efficacy of the AFS classification in predicting GERD (acid exposure time, AET > 6%) was assessed. Each component of the classification was compared with the corresponding HRM variable. Among 56 patients (48% men, BMI 23.5 kg/m2, age 43 years), an AET > 6% was found in 22 (39%), and in 0% of patients with AFS grade I, 5.9% with grade II, 52% with grade III and 77.8% with grade IV ( P < .001). The L component effectively predicted the EGJ type, the D the EGJ-Contractile Integral, while the absence of the flap valve was related to a positive Straight Leg Raise maneuver. The new grading system is able to stratify patients with pathologic GERD. Moreover, the single components of the AFS classification are associated with manometric markers of EGJ disruption.
美国前肠学会食管胃交界处完整性内窥镜分类能否预测酸反流和食管胃交界处破坏?
胃食管反流病(GERD)通常与食管胃交界处(EGJ)的破坏有关。内镜希尔分类法已被证明不足以评估 EGJ 的完整性。最近,美国前胃协会 (American Foregut Society, AFS) 制定了一种内窥镜分类法,主要针对食管裂孔疝 (L)、食管裂孔开口 (D) 和瓣膜 (F)。虽然 pH 值监测仍是诊断胃食管反流病的金标准,但高分辨率测压法(HRM)可以评估 EGJ 的解剖结构和能力。本研究的目的是在疑似胃食管反流患者中验证 AFS 分类,评估其预测 EGJ 破坏和病理性反流的准确性。我们对 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 3 月期间接受上内镜、HRM 和 pH 研究的疑似胃食管反流病患者进行了前瞻性登记。我们分析了人口统计学和临床数据。评估了 AFS 分类在预测胃食管反流病(酸暴露时间,AET > 6%)方面的效果。该分类的每个组成部分都与相应的 HRM 变量进行了比较。在 56 名患者(48% 为男性,体重指数 23.5 kg/m2,年龄 43 岁)中,22 人(39%)的 AET > 6%,AFS I 级患者为 0%,II 级为 5.9%,III 级为 52%,IV 级为 77.8% ( P < .001)。L 成分可有效预测 EGJ 类型,D 成分可预测 EGJ-收缩性积分,而皮瓣瓣膜缺失与直腿抬高动作阳性有关。新的分级系统能够对病理性胃食管反流患者进行分层。此外,AFS 分级的单个成分与 EGJ 干扰的压力测量标志物相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信