Early Readmission and Revision After Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Cause and Cost

Jennifer Bido, Ricardo Torres, Austin Kaidi, S. Rodriguez, Jose A. Rodriguez
{"title":"Early Readmission and Revision After Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Cause and Cost","authors":"Jennifer Bido, Ricardo Torres, Austin Kaidi, S. Rodriguez, Jose A. Rodriguez","doi":"10.1177/15563316241230052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Bundled payments for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) were instituted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to reimburse providers a lump sum for operative and 90-day postoperative costs. Gaining a better understanding of which TJA patients are at risk for early return to the operating room (OR) is critical in preoperative optimization of those with modifiable risks, which could improve bundled-payment performance. Purpose: We sought to identify the most common reason for readmissions, as well as patient characteristics and costs, associated with early return to the OR among TJA patients. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of Medicare patients who had undergone primary total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA) between 2013 and 2018 at a tertiary care hospital. We used the CMS research identifiable files database to identify the most common reasons for readmissions and revisions within 90 days of surgery. Total billing claims were used to determine the cost of early readmissions and revisions. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the characteristics associated with early readmission or revision. Results: Out of 20 166 primary TJA patients identified, we found 1349 readmissions (5.6%) and 163 (0.8%) revisions within 90 days of surgery. Dislocation was the most common indication for readmission, and periprosthetic joint infection was the most common indication for revision. Early return to the OR was associated with a mean $105,988 (standard deviation [SD] = $76,865) in CMS claims for the inpatient stay. Factors associated with a higher risk of early reoperation were female sex, THA, longer length of stay, and discharge to long-term care facility. Conclusions: This retrospective cohort study found that early return to the OR after TJA increased overall 90-day costs by 260%, suggesting that early reoperation might have a significant impact on bundled payments. Further study is warranted.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"49 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316241230052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bundled payments for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) were instituted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to reimburse providers a lump sum for operative and 90-day postoperative costs. Gaining a better understanding of which TJA patients are at risk for early return to the operating room (OR) is critical in preoperative optimization of those with modifiable risks, which could improve bundled-payment performance. Purpose: We sought to identify the most common reason for readmissions, as well as patient characteristics and costs, associated with early return to the OR among TJA patients. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of Medicare patients who had undergone primary total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA or TKA) between 2013 and 2018 at a tertiary care hospital. We used the CMS research identifiable files database to identify the most common reasons for readmissions and revisions within 90 days of surgery. Total billing claims were used to determine the cost of early readmissions and revisions. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the characteristics associated with early readmission or revision. Results: Out of 20 166 primary TJA patients identified, we found 1349 readmissions (5.6%) and 163 (0.8%) revisions within 90 days of surgery. Dislocation was the most common indication for readmission, and periprosthetic joint infection was the most common indication for revision. Early return to the OR was associated with a mean $105,988 (standard deviation [SD] = $76,865) in CMS claims for the inpatient stay. Factors associated with a higher risk of early reoperation were female sex, THA, longer length of stay, and discharge to long-term care facility. Conclusions: This retrospective cohort study found that early return to the OR after TJA increased overall 90-day costs by 260%, suggesting that early reoperation might have a significant impact on bundled payments. Further study is warranted.
全关节置换术后的早期再入院和翻修:原因与成本分析
背景:美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)对全关节置换术(TJA)实行捆绑支付,一次性补偿医疗机构的手术费用和 90 天术后费用。更好地了解哪些 TJA 患者有提前返回手术室(OR)的风险,对于术前优化那些有可改变风险的患者至关重要,这可以提高捆绑支付的绩效。目的:我们试图找出 TJA 患者再入院的最常见原因,以及与提前返回手术室相关的患者特征和费用。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是 2013 年至 2018 年期间在一家三级医疗医院接受初级全髋关节或膝关节置换术(THA 或 TKA)的医疗保险患者。我们使用 CMS 可识别研究档案数据库来确定手术后 90 天内再入院和翻修的最常见原因。账单索赔总额用于确定早期再入院和翻修的费用。我们使用多变量回归分析来确定与早期再入院或改期相关的特征。结果:在已确认的 20 166 名初级 TJA 患者中,我们发现在手术后 90 天内有 1349 例再入院(5.6%)和 163 例翻修(0.8%)。脱位是最常见的再入院指征,假体周围关节感染是最常见的翻修指征。提前返回手术室与CMS对住院患者的平均索赔额105,988美元(标准差[SD] = 76,865美元)有关。女性性别、THA、住院时间较长以及出院后转入长期护理机构等因素与提前再次手术的风险较高相关。结论:这项回顾性队列研究发现,TJA术后提前返回手术室会使90天的总费用增加260%,这表明提前再次手术可能会对捆绑支付产生重大影响。有必要开展进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信