The effects of stocking rate, residual sward height, and forage supplementation on forage production, feeding strategies, and productivity of milking dairy cows

Gastón Ortega, Natalia Berberian, P. Chilibroste
{"title":"The effects of stocking rate, residual sward height, and forage supplementation on forage production, feeding strategies, and productivity of milking dairy cows","authors":"Gastón Ortega, Natalia Berberian, P. Chilibroste","doi":"10.3389/fanim.2024.1319150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The intensification process in Uruguayan dairies over the last 30 years has involved increases in stocking rate (SR) and individual milk production. This research aimed to compare biophysical indicators along with the associated feeding strategies for Holstein–Jersey crossbred dairy cow systems. The comparison was conducted in farmlets representing a typical Uruguayan pasture-based dairy system on a grazing area. The study spanned from 2017 to 2019, combining 1.5 or 2.0 milking cows per hectare (SR), with two different residual sward heights (RH)—low (LR) and high (HR). These combinations resulted in four treatments: 1.5 LR, 1.5 HR, 2.0 LR, and 2.0 HR. A total of 96 cows were randomly allocated to each treatment based on parity, body weight (BW), and body condition score (BCS) for the years 2017, 2018, and 2019. The response variables per hectare were analyzed using a linear mixed model, including SR, RH, their interaction effect, year, and paddock as a repeated measurement. Results show that forage production did not differ between treatments, and forage directly harvested by cows was affected by SR, as well as milk and solids productivity. An interaction effect was detected between SR and RH on milk and milk solids production where 2.0 HR was higher than 2.0 LR, but treatments on SR 1.5 were not different between them. The consumption of concentrate, forage, and conserved forage per hectare was influenced by the level of SR. However, individual milk production was not influenced by SR or RH. Dry matter intake were affected by SR where 2.0 HR had higher consumption than 1.5 LR and 1.5 HR but was not different from 2.0 LR. The concentrate DMI per cow was not different between treatments, while the conserved forage DMI per cow was affected by SR and higher for SR 2.0 than that for SR 1.5. These combinations of feed determined varying proportions of time allocated for grazing, which were influenced by the SR and RH. This research highlights different approaches to enhance the competitiveness of Uruguayan grazing systems through improvements in forage harvest.","PeriodicalId":503755,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2024.1319150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The intensification process in Uruguayan dairies over the last 30 years has involved increases in stocking rate (SR) and individual milk production. This research aimed to compare biophysical indicators along with the associated feeding strategies for Holstein–Jersey crossbred dairy cow systems. The comparison was conducted in farmlets representing a typical Uruguayan pasture-based dairy system on a grazing area. The study spanned from 2017 to 2019, combining 1.5 or 2.0 milking cows per hectare (SR), with two different residual sward heights (RH)—low (LR) and high (HR). These combinations resulted in four treatments: 1.5 LR, 1.5 HR, 2.0 LR, and 2.0 HR. A total of 96 cows were randomly allocated to each treatment based on parity, body weight (BW), and body condition score (BCS) for the years 2017, 2018, and 2019. The response variables per hectare were analyzed using a linear mixed model, including SR, RH, their interaction effect, year, and paddock as a repeated measurement. Results show that forage production did not differ between treatments, and forage directly harvested by cows was affected by SR, as well as milk and solids productivity. An interaction effect was detected between SR and RH on milk and milk solids production where 2.0 HR was higher than 2.0 LR, but treatments on SR 1.5 were not different between them. The consumption of concentrate, forage, and conserved forage per hectare was influenced by the level of SR. However, individual milk production was not influenced by SR or RH. Dry matter intake were affected by SR where 2.0 HR had higher consumption than 1.5 LR and 1.5 HR but was not different from 2.0 LR. The concentrate DMI per cow was not different between treatments, while the conserved forage DMI per cow was affected by SR and higher for SR 2.0 than that for SR 1.5. These combinations of feed determined varying proportions of time allocated for grazing, which were influenced by the SR and RH. This research highlights different approaches to enhance the competitiveness of Uruguayan grazing systems through improvements in forage harvest.
放养率、残留草皮高度和草料补充对挤奶奶牛的草料产量、饲喂策略和生产率的影响
在过去30年中,乌拉圭奶牛场的集约化进程涉及提高存栏率(SR)和单头奶牛的产奶量。这项研究旨在比较荷斯坦-泽西杂交奶牛系统的生物物理指标和相关饲养策略。比较在代表乌拉圭牧区典型牧草型奶牛系统的牧场中进行。研究时间跨度为2017年至2019年,结合每公顷1.5头或2.0头挤奶牛(SR),以及两种不同的残留草皮高度(RH)--低(LR)和高(HR)。这些组合产生了四种处理:1.5 LR、1.5 HR、2.0 LR 和 2.0 HR。2017 年、2018 年和 2019 年,共有 96 头奶牛根据奇数、体重(BW)和体况评分(BCS)被随机分配到每个处理中。采用线性混合模型分析了每公顷的响应变量,包括SR、RH、它们的交互效应、年份以及作为重复测量的围场。结果表明,不同处理的饲草产量没有差异,奶牛直接收获的饲草受SR以及奶产量和固体产量的影响。SR和相对湿度对牛奶和乳固体产量有交互影响,其中2.0相对湿度高于2.0相对湿度,但SR为1.5的处理之间没有差异。每公顷精料、饲草和保存饲草的消耗量受SR水平的影响。但是,单头奶牛的产奶量不受SR或相对湿度的影响。干物质摄入量受SR的影响,2.0 HR的消耗量高于1.5 LR和1.5 HR,但与2.0 LR没有差异。不同处理间每头奶牛的精料DMI没有差异,而每头奶牛的饲草DMI受SR影响,SR 2.0的DMI高于SR 1.5。这些饲料组合决定了不同比例的放牧时间,而放牧时间又受SR和相对湿度的影响。这项研究强调了通过改善牧草收割来提高乌拉圭放牧系统竞争力的不同方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信