Role of magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating tuberculous spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis in a TB endemic area

Sachin Sharma, M. S. Ahmad, Shreya Bhat, Asif Khursheed
{"title":"Role of magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating tuberculous spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis in a TB endemic area","authors":"Sachin Sharma, M. S. Ahmad, Shreya Bhat, Asif Khursheed","doi":"10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20240322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Infectious spondylitis is an infection by a specific organism of one or more components of spine, namely the vertebra, intervertebral discs, paraspinal soft tissues, and epidural space. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine is gold standard in imaging to assess anatomical abnormalities of the spine and surrounding structures.\nMethods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the Department of Radiology Narayan Medical College and Hospital Sasaram, Bihar (India), where tuberculosis is endemic from July 2022 to September 2023. It included 40 patients, purposively sampled, adhering to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI in discriminating tuberculous spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis were compared against histopathological diagnosis and differences in MRI findings between these conditions were obtained.\nResults: In this study, 93% patients with tuberculous spondylitis had an enhanced signal with well-defined margins. Meanwhile, pyogenic spondylitis provided an ill-defined margins in 72.7% patients. Most of the patients 82.7% with tuberculous spondylitis showed thin and smooth wall paravertebral abscesses, while pyogenic spondylitis showed an irregular and thick wall paravertebral abscesses in 45% patients. A total of 72.4% patients with tuberculous spondylitis indicated involvement of ≥3 vertebral bodies. 100% patients with pyogenic spondylitis showed an abnormal contrast enhancement of the intervertebral discs. It was identified that tuberculous spondylitis had sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of 100%, 84.6%, and 95.2% respectively. For pyogenic spondylitis, the corresponding values were 84.6%, 96.6%, and 93%.\nConclusions: MRI was accurate for differentiation of tuberculous spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis. A well-defined paraspinal abnormal signal, a thin and smooth abscess wall, subligamentous spread to three or more vertebral levels, and less likely involvement of intervertebral discs were more suggestive of tuberculous spondylitis than pyogenic spondylitis.","PeriodicalId":506251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics","volume":"132 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.intjresorthop20240322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infectious spondylitis is an infection by a specific organism of one or more components of spine, namely the vertebra, intervertebral discs, paraspinal soft tissues, and epidural space. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine is gold standard in imaging to assess anatomical abnormalities of the spine and surrounding structures. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the Department of Radiology Narayan Medical College and Hospital Sasaram, Bihar (India), where tuberculosis is endemic from July 2022 to September 2023. It included 40 patients, purposively sampled, adhering to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI in discriminating tuberculous spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis were compared against histopathological diagnosis and differences in MRI findings between these conditions were obtained. Results: In this study, 93% patients with tuberculous spondylitis had an enhanced signal with well-defined margins. Meanwhile, pyogenic spondylitis provided an ill-defined margins in 72.7% patients. Most of the patients 82.7% with tuberculous spondylitis showed thin and smooth wall paravertebral abscesses, while pyogenic spondylitis showed an irregular and thick wall paravertebral abscesses in 45% patients. A total of 72.4% patients with tuberculous spondylitis indicated involvement of ≥3 vertebral bodies. 100% patients with pyogenic spondylitis showed an abnormal contrast enhancement of the intervertebral discs. It was identified that tuberculous spondylitis had sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of 100%, 84.6%, and 95.2% respectively. For pyogenic spondylitis, the corresponding values were 84.6%, 96.6%, and 93%. Conclusions: MRI was accurate for differentiation of tuberculous spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis. A well-defined paraspinal abnormal signal, a thin and smooth abscess wall, subligamentous spread to three or more vertebral levels, and less likely involvement of intervertebral discs were more suggestive of tuberculous spondylitis than pyogenic spondylitis.
磁共振成像在结核病流行地区区分结核性脊柱炎和化脓性脊柱炎中的作用
背景:感染性脊柱炎是脊柱的一个或多个组成部分,即椎骨、椎间盘、脊柱旁软组织和硬膜外间隙受到特定生物的感染。脊柱磁共振成像(MRI)是评估脊柱及其周围结构解剖异常的金标准成像:这项横断面观察性研究于 2022 年 7 月至 2023 年 9 月在比哈尔邦(印度)结核病流行的萨萨拉姆 Narayan 医学院和医院放射科进行。该研究按照严格的纳入和排除标准,有目的地抽取了 40 名患者。将核磁共振成像在鉴别结核性脊柱炎和化脓性脊柱炎方面的敏感性、特异性和准确性与组织病理学诊断进行了比较,并得出了这些疾病之间核磁共振成像结果的差异:结果:在这项研究中,93%的结核性脊柱炎患者信号增强,边缘清晰。与此同时,72.7%的化脓性脊柱炎患者边缘不清晰。大多数结核性脊柱炎患者(82.7%)的椎旁脓肿壁薄且光滑,而化脓性脊柱炎患者(45%)的椎旁脓肿壁不规则且厚。共有 72.4% 的结核性脊柱炎患者显示受累椎体≥3 个。100%的化脓性脊柱炎患者椎间盘出现异常造影剂增强。结果表明,结核性脊柱炎的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为 100%、84.6% 和 95.2%。化脓性脊柱炎的相应数值分别为 84.6%、96.6% 和 93%:结论:磁共振成像能准确区分结核性脊柱炎和化脓性脊柱炎。与化脓性脊柱炎相比,明确的脊柱旁异常信号、薄而光滑的脓肿壁、韧带下扩散至三个或三个以上的椎体水平以及椎间盘受累的可能性较小,更能提示结核性脊柱炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信