How Can Teachers Improve? Using Culturally Responsive Frameworks to Examine Adolescent Perspectives

Lora Henderson Smith, David Aguayo, Toshna Pandey, W. Reinke, K. Herman, Katrina J. Debnam
{"title":"How Can Teachers Improve? Using Culturally Responsive Frameworks to Examine Adolescent Perspectives","authors":"Lora Henderson Smith, David Aguayo, Toshna Pandey, W. Reinke, K. Herman, Katrina J. Debnam","doi":"10.1177/07435584241230960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Few qualitative studies have examined student perspectives on teachers’ culturally responsive practices (CRP). This study includes focus group data from middle and high school students who shared perspectives on how teachers can improve their classroom practices and examined if reported concepts align with or go beyond existing models of CRP. Black, Latine, or White students ( N = 103) in the Midwest participated in 1 of 23 focus groups. We identified 103 excerpts where students mentioned ways that their teachers could improve their classroom practices. Two researchers coded each excerpt for alignment with two different models of CRP, the Double Check CARES framework and the Eight Competencies of Culturally Responsive Teaching. Thirty-six excerpts did not align with either framework whereas the remaining 67 aligned with one or both frameworks. We discuss common codes, differences, and similarities across heterogenous focus groups and those with only students of color or White students. We also present themes that were not aligned with Double Check CARES or the Eight Competencies and discuss implications for incorporating student voice into the conceptualization of CRP and improving classroom practices.","PeriodicalId":503297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent Research","volume":"65 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescent Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584241230960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Few qualitative studies have examined student perspectives on teachers’ culturally responsive practices (CRP). This study includes focus group data from middle and high school students who shared perspectives on how teachers can improve their classroom practices and examined if reported concepts align with or go beyond existing models of CRP. Black, Latine, or White students ( N = 103) in the Midwest participated in 1 of 23 focus groups. We identified 103 excerpts where students mentioned ways that their teachers could improve their classroom practices. Two researchers coded each excerpt for alignment with two different models of CRP, the Double Check CARES framework and the Eight Competencies of Culturally Responsive Teaching. Thirty-six excerpts did not align with either framework whereas the remaining 67 aligned with one or both frameworks. We discuss common codes, differences, and similarities across heterogenous focus groups and those with only students of color or White students. We also present themes that were not aligned with Double Check CARES or the Eight Competencies and discuss implications for incorporating student voice into the conceptualization of CRP and improving classroom practices.
教师如何改进?利用文化敏感性框架研究青少年的观点
很少有定性研究考察学生对教师的文化顺应实践(CRP)的看法。本研究包括来自初高中学生的焦点小组数据,他们分享了关于教师如何改进课堂实践的观点,并考察了所报告的概念是否符合或超越了现有的文化顺应实践模式。中西部地区的黑人、拉丁裔或白人学生(103 人)参加了 23 个焦点小组中的一个。我们确定了 103 个摘录,学生们在这些摘录中提到了他们的老师可以改进课堂实践的方法。两名研究人员对每个摘录进行了编码,以便与两种不同的 CRP 模式(双向检查 CARES 框架和文化顺应性教学的八项能力)保持一致。有 36 篇摘录与这两个框架都不一致,而其余 67 篇摘录与其中一个或两个框架都一致。我们讨论了异质焦点小组和只有有色人种或白人学生参加的焦点小组的共同代码、差异和相似之处。我们还介绍了与 "双重检查 CARES "或 "八种能力 "不一致的主题,并讨论了将学生的声音纳入 CRP 概念化和改进课堂实践的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书