Achievement goal theory in STEM education: A systematic review

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Alexander Vincent Struck Jannini, Zeynep Akdemir, Muhsin Menekse
{"title":"Achievement goal theory in STEM education: A systematic review","authors":"Alexander Vincent Struck Jannini,&nbsp;Zeynep Akdemir,&nbsp;Muhsin Menekse","doi":"10.1002/jee.20585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Achievement goal theory is a popular motivational theory within education and psychology, with several review papers summarizing the extensive work done in these fields. Although reviews exist in these specific fields, none exists within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. This is a considerable gap in our knowledge as STEM educators, especially engineering educators, where motivation is often ill-defined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This paper highlights the findings of a systematic review of how STEM educators have used achievement goal theory within undergraduate STEM education.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Scope/Method</h3>\n \n <p>We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist for our search. A total of 50 studies (43 journal articles and 7 conference proceedings) were included in our review.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our review revealed five common themes: quantitative methodologies, sex, emotions, academic achievement, and culture. A majority of the papers reviewed used quantitative methods. Although there was inconclusive evidence of differences in motivational orientations based on biological sex, the most studied emotion (anxiety) was found to be inversely correlated with mastery orientations. Among the many ways to measure academic achievement, exam scores was the most popular method reported. Lastly, ethnic, institutional, and department cultures were significant factors in shaping a student's motivational orientation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our review suggests that a motivational difference between students based on biological sex is inconclusive. We also recommend more studies that use qualitative or mixed methodologies to gain further insight into students' motivational processes and consider how cultural contexts may impact students' motivational orientations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Education","volume":"113 4","pages":"986-1007"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jee.20585","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jee.20585","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Achievement goal theory is a popular motivational theory within education and psychology, with several review papers summarizing the extensive work done in these fields. Although reviews exist in these specific fields, none exists within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. This is a considerable gap in our knowledge as STEM educators, especially engineering educators, where motivation is often ill-defined.

Purpose

This paper highlights the findings of a systematic review of how STEM educators have used achievement goal theory within undergraduate STEM education.

Scope/Method

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 checklist for our search. A total of 50 studies (43 journal articles and 7 conference proceedings) were included in our review.

Results

Our review revealed five common themes: quantitative methodologies, sex, emotions, academic achievement, and culture. A majority of the papers reviewed used quantitative methods. Although there was inconclusive evidence of differences in motivational orientations based on biological sex, the most studied emotion (anxiety) was found to be inversely correlated with mastery orientations. Among the many ways to measure academic achievement, exam scores was the most popular method reported. Lastly, ethnic, institutional, and department cultures were significant factors in shaping a student's motivational orientation.

Conclusions

Our review suggests that a motivational difference between students based on biological sex is inconclusive. We also recommend more studies that use qualitative or mixed methodologies to gain further insight into students' motivational processes and consider how cultural contexts may impact students' motivational orientations.

Abstract Image

STEM 教育中的成就目标理论:系统回顾
成就目标理论是教育学和心理学中一种流行的动机理论,有多篇评论文章总结了这些领域的大量工作。虽然在这些特定领域都有综述,但在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)教育领域却没有综述。作为 STEM 教育工作者,尤其是工程教育工作者,这是我们知识中的一个相当大的空白,因为在这些领域中,动机往往定义不清。本文重点介绍了对 STEM 教育工作者如何在本科 STEM 教育中使用成就目标理论进行系统性综述的结果。我们按照《系统性综述和元分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)2020 清单进行了检索。我们的综述揭示了五个共同的主题:定量方法、性别、情感、学业成绩和文化。大部分综述论文都使用了定量方法。虽然没有确凿证据表明基于生理性别的动机取向存在差异,但研究发现,研究最多的情绪(焦虑)与掌握取向成反比。在衡量学业成绩的多种方法中,考试成绩是最常用的方法。最后,种族、机构和院系文化是影响学生动机取向的重要因素。我们还建议开展更多使用定性或混合方法的研究,以进一步深入了解学生的动机过程,并考虑文化背景如何影响学生的动机取向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Education
Journal of Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering Education (JEE) serves to cultivate, disseminate, and archive scholarly research in engineering education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信