A128 OPTIMIZED COMPUTER ASSISTED TECHNIQUE FOR INCREASING ADENOMA DETECTION DURING COLONOSCOPY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

R. Djinbachian, M. Taghiakbari, A. Barkun, E. Medawar, B. Panzini, S. Sidani, J Liu, D. von Renteln
{"title":"A128 OPTIMIZED COMPUTER ASSISTED TECHNIQUE FOR INCREASING ADENOMA DETECTION DURING COLONOSCOPY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL","authors":"R. Djinbachian, M. Taghiakbari, A. Barkun, E. Medawar, B. Panzini, S. Sidani, J Liu, D. von Renteln","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwad061.128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Efforts to improve colonoscopy have recently focused on improving adenoma detection interventions such as artificial intelligence (CADe) that have demonstrated improvements in Adenoma Detection Rates (ADR). Although studies have focused on implementation of one intervention at a time. Aims We evaluated an optimized computer assisted technique (CADopt) versus standard colonoscopy to improve ADR during colonosocopy. Methods A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted enrolling adults (45–80 years) undergoing elective colonoscopy. Participants were randomized (1:1) to the intervention group (CADopt, and control group. In the CADopt group, endoscopists used a computer aided polyp detection combined with linked colour imaging, water exchange colonoscopy, and cecal retroflexion. In the control group, standard colonoscopy was performed. Primary outcome was Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) in the intervention and control groups. Secondary outcomes included advanced ADR (AADR) and sessile serrated lesion detection rates (SDR). Results A total of 467 patients were recruited and randomized (CADopt group 229 patients, 50.2% female vs 238 patients, 48.3% female in the control group). ADR was 49.3% (95%CI 42.7-56.0) for the CADopt group vs 38.2% (95%CI 32.0-44.7) for the control group (p=0.016). AADR and SDR were 13.1% (95%CI 9.0-18.2) and 6.6% (95%CI 3.7-10.6) for the CADopt group versus 8.0% (95%CI 4.9-12.2), and 7.1% (95%CI 4.2-11.1) for the control group, respectively. Conclusions Using an optimized computer assisted technique led to significant improvements in ADR and a trend towards AADR improvements. Funding Agencies Fujifilm","PeriodicalId":508018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":"767 ","pages":"97 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwad061.128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Efforts to improve colonoscopy have recently focused on improving adenoma detection interventions such as artificial intelligence (CADe) that have demonstrated improvements in Adenoma Detection Rates (ADR). Although studies have focused on implementation of one intervention at a time. Aims We evaluated an optimized computer assisted technique (CADopt) versus standard colonoscopy to improve ADR during colonosocopy. Methods A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted enrolling adults (45–80 years) undergoing elective colonoscopy. Participants were randomized (1:1) to the intervention group (CADopt, and control group. In the CADopt group, endoscopists used a computer aided polyp detection combined with linked colour imaging, water exchange colonoscopy, and cecal retroflexion. In the control group, standard colonoscopy was performed. Primary outcome was Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) in the intervention and control groups. Secondary outcomes included advanced ADR (AADR) and sessile serrated lesion detection rates (SDR). Results A total of 467 patients were recruited and randomized (CADopt group 229 patients, 50.2% female vs 238 patients, 48.3% female in the control group). ADR was 49.3% (95%CI 42.7-56.0) for the CADopt group vs 38.2% (95%CI 32.0-44.7) for the control group (p=0.016). AADR and SDR were 13.1% (95%CI 9.0-18.2) and 6.6% (95%CI 3.7-10.6) for the CADopt group versus 8.0% (95%CI 4.9-12.2), and 7.1% (95%CI 4.2-11.1) for the control group, respectively. Conclusions Using an optimized computer assisted technique led to significant improvements in ADR and a trend towards AADR improvements. Funding Agencies Fujifilm
A128 提高结肠镜检查腺瘤检出率的优化计算机辅助技术:随机对照试验
摘要 背景 改进结肠镜检查的努力最近集中于改进腺瘤检测干预措施,如人工智能 (CADe),这些措施已证明提高了腺瘤检测率 (ADR)。尽管这些研究主要集中在一次实施一项干预措施。目的 我们对优化的计算机辅助技术(CADopt)与标准结肠镜检查进行了评估,以提高结肠镜检查时的腺瘤检出率。方法 我们进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,招募了接受择期结肠镜检查的成人(45-80 岁)。参与者被随机(1:1)分为干预组(CADopt)和对照组。在 CADopt 组中,内镜医师使用计算机辅助息肉检测,并结合联动彩色成像、水交换结肠镜检查和盲肠反折。对照组则进行标准结肠镜检查。主要结果是干预组和对照组的腺瘤检出率(ADR)。次要结果包括晚期腺瘤检出率(ADR)和无柄锯齿状病变检出率(SDR)。结果 共招募并随机分配了 467 名患者(CADopt 组 229 名患者,50.2% 为女性;对照组 238 名患者,48.3% 为女性)。CADopt 组的 ADR 为 49.3%(95%CI 42.7-56.0),对照组为 38.2%(95%CI 32.0-44.7)(P=0.016)。CADopt 组的 AADR 和 SDR 分别为 13.1%(95%CI 9.0-18.2)和 6.6%(95%CI 3.7-10.6),而对照组分别为 8.0%(95%CI 4.9-12.2)和 7.1%(95%CI 4.2-11.1)。结论 使用优化的计算机辅助技术可显著改善 ADR,并有改善 AADR 的趋势。资助机构 富士胶片公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信