A271 EFFECT OF ANTI-TNF AGENTS ON DNA METHYLATION IN PERIPHERAL BLOOD OF PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

J. Venner, J. Francis, J. Rumore, M. Sargent, M Jones, C. Bernstein
{"title":"A271 EFFECT OF ANTI-TNF AGENTS ON DNA METHYLATION IN PERIPHERAL BLOOD OF PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE","authors":"J. Venner, J. Francis, J. Rumore, M. Sargent, M Jones, C. Bernstein","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwad061.271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Despite the success and ongoing use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), there are no predictors of response to therapy. While much research has gone into understanding genetic risks for IBD, less work has been done exploring epigenetic associations with treatment. Hence, we wondered whether epigenetic changes were associated with failure of TNFi in IBD. Aims Describe the association of TNFi response with DNA methylation in patients with IBD. Methods Participants ≥18 years with IBD (N=169) were selected from the Inflammation, Microbiome, and Alimentation: Gastro-Intestinal and Neuropsychiatric Effects (IMAGINE) Strategy for Patient Oriented Research (SPOR) Network. At enrollment participants completed a questionnaire that included their disease diagnosis, therapy, smoking history, and disease activity using the validated IBD Symptom Inventory (IBDSI). Patients provided whole blood samples that were processed for and run on Illumina DNA methylation arrays. Results The 169 patients were in three treatment groups: TNFi naïve (N=98, never exposed to an anti-TNF agent), TNFi responder (N=32, inactive disease on anti-TNF agent), and TNFi nonresponder (N=39, active disease not on any biologic at time of enrollment). The mean symptom score (SIBDSI) was different across the three groups (pampersand:003C0.001): TNFi nonresponders having a higher SIBDSI (24 ± 6.1) than the TNFi naïve (9.1 ± 5.5) or responder (8.3 ± 4.3) treatment groups. Relative proportions of leukocyte populations were estimated using DNA methylation. CD4 and CD8 T cell and B cell counts were higher (pampersand:003C0.05) in the nonresponders and responders versus TNFi naïve group. Neutrophil counts were lower (pampersand:003C0.05) in the TNFi nonresponders and responders compared to the TNFi naïve group (Figure 1). There was a trend towards increased epigenetic estimates of age acceleration (pampersand:003E0.05) in nonresponders versus responders and TNFi naïve patients, likely driven by disease activity (data not shown). Epigenome-wide analysis of the three groups revealed 16 CpGs for responder versus naïve (e.g. CDK5 regulatory subunit-associated protein 1-like 1 (CDKAL1), and two CpGs for nonresponders versus responders (Table 1). This includes a CpG for guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit gamma-2 (GNG2) that was shared between the two comparisons. Conclusions Exposure to TNFi is associated with changes in peripheral leukocyte populations independent of response to treatment, indicating a TNFi effect. This implies that anti-TNF treatment is having some effect on patients even if there is clinical nonresponse. Differentially expressed CpGs implicates possible markers of response to treatment, particularly CDKAL1, a gene that has been associated with TNFi response in psoriasis. Funding Agencies Guts and Roses Charity","PeriodicalId":508018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":"31 ","pages":"218 - 219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwad061.271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Despite the success and ongoing use of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), there are no predictors of response to therapy. While much research has gone into understanding genetic risks for IBD, less work has been done exploring epigenetic associations with treatment. Hence, we wondered whether epigenetic changes were associated with failure of TNFi in IBD. Aims Describe the association of TNFi response with DNA methylation in patients with IBD. Methods Participants ≥18 years with IBD (N=169) were selected from the Inflammation, Microbiome, and Alimentation: Gastro-Intestinal and Neuropsychiatric Effects (IMAGINE) Strategy for Patient Oriented Research (SPOR) Network. At enrollment participants completed a questionnaire that included their disease diagnosis, therapy, smoking history, and disease activity using the validated IBD Symptom Inventory (IBDSI). Patients provided whole blood samples that were processed for and run on Illumina DNA methylation arrays. Results The 169 patients were in three treatment groups: TNFi naïve (N=98, never exposed to an anti-TNF agent), TNFi responder (N=32, inactive disease on anti-TNF agent), and TNFi nonresponder (N=39, active disease not on any biologic at time of enrollment). The mean symptom score (SIBDSI) was different across the three groups (pampersand:003C0.001): TNFi nonresponders having a higher SIBDSI (24 ± 6.1) than the TNFi naïve (9.1 ± 5.5) or responder (8.3 ± 4.3) treatment groups. Relative proportions of leukocyte populations were estimated using DNA methylation. CD4 and CD8 T cell and B cell counts were higher (pampersand:003C0.05) in the nonresponders and responders versus TNFi naïve group. Neutrophil counts were lower (pampersand:003C0.05) in the TNFi nonresponders and responders compared to the TNFi naïve group (Figure 1). There was a trend towards increased epigenetic estimates of age acceleration (pampersand:003E0.05) in nonresponders versus responders and TNFi naïve patients, likely driven by disease activity (data not shown). Epigenome-wide analysis of the three groups revealed 16 CpGs for responder versus naïve (e.g. CDK5 regulatory subunit-associated protein 1-like 1 (CDKAL1), and two CpGs for nonresponders versus responders (Table 1). This includes a CpG for guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit gamma-2 (GNG2) that was shared between the two comparisons. Conclusions Exposure to TNFi is associated with changes in peripheral leukocyte populations independent of response to treatment, indicating a TNFi effect. This implies that anti-TNF treatment is having some effect on patients even if there is clinical nonresponse. Differentially expressed CpGs implicates possible markers of response to treatment, particularly CDKAL1, a gene that has been associated with TNFi response in psoriasis. Funding Agencies Guts and Roses Charity
A271 抗 TNF 药物对炎症性肠病患者外周血 DNA 甲基化的影响
摘要 背景 尽管肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)在治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)方面取得了成功并持续使用,但目前还没有治疗反应的预测指标。虽然很多研究都在了解 IBD 的遗传风险,但探索表观遗传与治疗的关系的工作却较少。因此,我们想知道表观遗传学变化是否与IBD TNFi治疗失败有关。目的 描述 IBD 患者 TNFi 反应与 DNA 甲基化的关联。方法 从 "炎症、微生物组和饮食 "研究中选取≥18 岁的 IBD 患者(169 人):胃肠道和神经精神影响(IMAGINE)患者导向研究战略(SPOR)网络中选出。参与者在注册时填写了一份问卷,内容包括疾病诊断、治疗、吸烟史以及使用有效的 IBDSI 症状量表(IBDSI)进行的疾病活动。患者提供的全血样经处理后在 Illumina DNA 甲基化阵列上运行。结果 169 名患者分为三个治疗组:TNFi 天真组(N=98,从未接触过抗 TNF 药物)、TNFi 反应者组(N=32,使用抗 TNF 药物的非活动性疾病)和 TNFi 非反应者组(N=39,入组时未使用任何生物制剂的活动性疾病)。三组患者的平均症状评分(SIBDSI)不同(pampersand:003C0.001):TNFi 无应答者的 SIBDSI(24 ± 6.1)高于 TNFi 新药治疗组(9.1 ± 5.5)或应答者治疗组(8.3 ± 4.3)。利用DNA甲基化估计了白细胞群的相对比例。与 TNFi 未激活组相比,未应答组和应答组的 CD4 和 CD8 T 细胞及 B 细胞计数更高(pampersand:003C0.05)。与 TNFi 天真组相比,TNFi 非应答者和应答者的中性粒细胞计数较低(pampersand:003C0.05)(图 1)。非应答者与应答者和 TNFi 天真患者相比,年龄加速的表观遗传估计值有增加的趋势(pampersand:003E0.05),这可能是由疾病活动引起的(数据未显示)。对三组患者的全表观基因组分析显示,应答者与未应答者(如 CDK5 调节亚基相关蛋白 1-like 1 (CDKAL1))有 16 个 CpGs,未应答者与应答者有 2 个 CpGs(表 1)。其中包括一个鸟嘌呤核苷酸结合蛋白亚基γ-2(GNG2)的CpG,该CpG在两组比较中共享。结论 暴露于 TNFi 与外周白细胞群的变化相关,而与治疗反应无关,这表明 TNFi 具有效应。这意味着,即使临床无反应,抗 TNF 治疗也会对患者产生一定的影响。差异表达的CpGs可能是治疗反应的标记,特别是CDKAL1,该基因与银屑病的TNFi反应有关。资助机构 内脏与玫瑰慈善机构
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信