A265 BARRIERS TO DIETARY MODIFICATION IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE (IBD): A MIXED-METHODS ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT PERCEPTIONS

J. Szeto, C. V. Noejovich, R. Verma, P. Miranda, M. Pinto-Sanchez, Eduardo Verdu, D. Armstrong
{"title":"A265 BARRIERS TO DIETARY MODIFICATION IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE (IBD): A MIXED-METHODS ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT PERCEPTIONS","authors":"J. Szeto, C. V. Noejovich, R. Verma, P. Miranda, M. Pinto-Sanchez, Eduardo Verdu, D. Armstrong","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwad061.265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Many patients living with IBD identify diet as a key factor in managing their disease, symptoms and general health, and many report implementing dietary restrictions in response to disease activity and symptoms. Despite increasing data on the role of diet, IBD patients face a variety of challenges that can compromise adherence to dietary recommendations in clinical practice. Aims To identify IBD patients’ perceptions regarding barriers to dietary modification and to understand their experiences and expectations of dietary advice from gastroenterologists (GI) or dietitians (RD). Methods A mixed-method qualitative data collection strategy with semi-structured focus group and individual one-on-one interviews moderated by a clinical psychologist over a web-based, video communication platform (Zoom). Adult IBD patients (between 18 to 75 years old) attending the McMaster University Medical Centre IBD Clinic were invited to join a focus group consisting of 2-6 individuals or a one-on-one interview. All participants were asked to complete a demographics survey (REDCap) before the session. Recorded audio files for all sessions were transcribed, de-identified and reviewed for accuracy by 2 reviewers with an independent adjudicator to resolve discrepancies followed by thematic analysis (NVIVO). Results Between May to December 2022 and May 2023, 38 of 90 invitees took part in 11 focus groups and 9 chose individual interviews. Most participants (mean age 42 years; 60% female) were Caucasian (87%); 42% had a self-reported history of mental health disorders. Mean IBD duration was 16 years (min-max: 0.5–44 years); 73% were in remission and 68% had Crohn’s disease. Thematic analysis identified 5 primary and 11 secondary barriers to dietary adoption (Table). Participants reported positive and negative experiences with dietary advice from GIs and RDs; expectations included GI referral to a specialist RD and integration of an RD into the health care team. Conclusions IBD patients report multiple, varied barriers to dietary adoption and identify a need for improved access to dietary advice and other resources, including integration of RDs into primary and IBD Clinic care teams. The identification of multiple, varied patient-reported barriers offers an opportunity to develop personalized dietary advice for IBD patients to enhance health, well-being and quality of life. Thematic map of barriers experienced by patients when adopting dietary modifications Primary Barriers Secondary Barriers Difficulty identifying foods or diets affecting IBD Lack of guidance in identifying foods or diets Difficulty correlating symptoms with diet Barriers to accessing IBD diet foods Limited availability of IBD-friendly food options Expense of speciality food items Psychological Factors Anxiety in relation to food Aversive attitude to food Personal struggles with diet adherence Challenges with diet protocol complexity Changing habits and lifestyle Avoiding food cravings Social and family challenges in dietary implementation Stress and pressure when eating in social settings Challenge integrating family’s needs into diet Funding Agencies Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute; Douglas Family","PeriodicalId":508018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":"111 3","pages":"213 - 214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwad061.265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Many patients living with IBD identify diet as a key factor in managing their disease, symptoms and general health, and many report implementing dietary restrictions in response to disease activity and symptoms. Despite increasing data on the role of diet, IBD patients face a variety of challenges that can compromise adherence to dietary recommendations in clinical practice. Aims To identify IBD patients’ perceptions regarding barriers to dietary modification and to understand their experiences and expectations of dietary advice from gastroenterologists (GI) or dietitians (RD). Methods A mixed-method qualitative data collection strategy with semi-structured focus group and individual one-on-one interviews moderated by a clinical psychologist over a web-based, video communication platform (Zoom). Adult IBD patients (between 18 to 75 years old) attending the McMaster University Medical Centre IBD Clinic were invited to join a focus group consisting of 2-6 individuals or a one-on-one interview. All participants were asked to complete a demographics survey (REDCap) before the session. Recorded audio files for all sessions were transcribed, de-identified and reviewed for accuracy by 2 reviewers with an independent adjudicator to resolve discrepancies followed by thematic analysis (NVIVO). Results Between May to December 2022 and May 2023, 38 of 90 invitees took part in 11 focus groups and 9 chose individual interviews. Most participants (mean age 42 years; 60% female) were Caucasian (87%); 42% had a self-reported history of mental health disorders. Mean IBD duration was 16 years (min-max: 0.5–44 years); 73% were in remission and 68% had Crohn’s disease. Thematic analysis identified 5 primary and 11 secondary barriers to dietary adoption (Table). Participants reported positive and negative experiences with dietary advice from GIs and RDs; expectations included GI referral to a specialist RD and integration of an RD into the health care team. Conclusions IBD patients report multiple, varied barriers to dietary adoption and identify a need for improved access to dietary advice and other resources, including integration of RDs into primary and IBD Clinic care teams. The identification of multiple, varied patient-reported barriers offers an opportunity to develop personalized dietary advice for IBD patients to enhance health, well-being and quality of life. Thematic map of barriers experienced by patients when adopting dietary modifications Primary Barriers Secondary Barriers Difficulty identifying foods or diets affecting IBD Lack of guidance in identifying foods or diets Difficulty correlating symptoms with diet Barriers to accessing IBD diet foods Limited availability of IBD-friendly food options Expense of speciality food items Psychological Factors Anxiety in relation to food Aversive attitude to food Personal struggles with diet adherence Challenges with diet protocol complexity Changing habits and lifestyle Avoiding food cravings Social and family challenges in dietary implementation Stress and pressure when eating in social settings Challenge integrating family’s needs into diet Funding Agencies Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute; Douglas Family
A265 炎症性肠病(IBD)饮食调整的障碍:对患者看法的混合方法评估
摘要 背景 许多 IBD 患者认为饮食是控制病情、症状和总体健康的关键因素,许多患者报告说,他们根据病情活动和症状实施了饮食限制。尽管有关饮食作用的数据越来越多,但 IBD 患者仍面临着各种挑战,这些挑战可能会影响临床实践中对饮食建议的坚持。目的 确定 IBD 患者对饮食调整障碍的看法,了解他们对肠胃病学家 (GI) 或营养师 (RD) 提供的饮食建议的体验和期望。方法 采用混合方法定性数据收集策略,由临床心理学家通过网络视频交流平台(Zoom)主持半结构化焦点小组和一对一个人访谈。麦克马斯特大学医学中心 IBD 诊所的成年 IBD 患者(18 至 75 岁)受邀参加由 2-6 人组成的焦点小组或一对一访谈。所有参与者都被要求在会前完成一份人口统计学调查(REDCap)。所有会议的录音文件均由两名审查员进行转录、去标识化和准确性审查,并由一名独立评审员解决差异问题,然后进行专题分析(NVIVO)。结果 在 2022 年 5 月至 12 月以及 2023 年 5 月期间,90 名受邀者中有 38 人参加了 11 个焦点小组,9 人选择了个别访谈。大多数参与者(平均年龄 42 岁;60% 为女性)为白种人(87%);42% 自述有精神疾病史。平均 IBD 病程为 16 年(最小-最大:0.5-44 年);73% 的患者病情缓解,68% 的患者患有克罗恩病。主题分析确定了采用饮食的 5 个主要障碍和 11 个次要障碍(见表)。参与者报告了从消化科医生和营养师那里获得饮食建议的积极和消极经历;期望包括消化科医生转诊给专业营养师以及将营养师纳入医疗团队。结论 IBD 患者报告了采用饮食疗法的多种不同障碍,并指出需要改善获得饮食建议和其他资源的途径,包括将营养师纳入初级和 IBD 诊所医疗团队。发现患者报告的多种不同障碍为制定针对 IBD 患者的个性化饮食建议提供了机会,从而提高患者的健康、福祉和生活质量。患者在调整饮食时遇到的障碍专题图 主要障碍 次要障碍 难以确定影响 IBD 的食物或饮食 在确定食物或饮食方面缺乏指导 难以将症状与饮食联系起来 在获取 IBD 饮食食物方面遇到的障碍 IBD 适宜食物的供应有限心理因素 对食物的焦虑 对食物的厌恶态度 个人在坚持饮食方面的挣扎 饮食方案的复杂性所带来的挑战 改变生活习惯和生活方式 避免对食物的渴望 在饮食实施过程中面临的社会和家庭挑战 在社交场合进食时面临的压力和压力 将家庭需求纳入饮食的挑战 资助机构 Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute;道格拉斯家族
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信