A75 PEDIATRIC ABDOMINAL PAIN PRESENTING TO A HOSPITAL-BASED GI CLINIC: EVOLUTION AND DISPOSITION

H. Brill, R Patel
{"title":"A75 PEDIATRIC ABDOMINAL PAIN PRESENTING TO A HOSPITAL-BASED GI CLINIC: EVOLUTION AND DISPOSITION","authors":"H. Brill, R Patel","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwad061.075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Abdominal pain accounts for 50% of pediatric gastroenterology consultations. While data exists on the possible etiologies of abdominal pain, there is a paucity of data on the natural evolution of abdominal pain while under the care of a Pediatric Gastroenterologist. Given limited access to Pediatric Gastroenterologists and long waiting times for initial consultation for abdominal pain, understanding what interventions ameliorate pain may help Gastroenterologists advise referring physicians while the patient awaits a consultation. Aims Primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients who reported at least a 75% subjective improvement of pain over baseline consultation. Methods A retrospective chart review between April 2014 and Dec 31, 2022 was taken in a hospital based GI clinic. Subjects referred for assessment of abdominal pain were identified, along with subjects referred for reflux and dysphagia as a comparator group. Subsequent visits were abstracted to identify diagnosis disposition and assess which interventions were tried and to what extent they succeeded. Patient loss to follow up were also measured. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics, and regression modeling will be attempted to identify predictors of response. Results 393 subjects were referred for abdominal pain and 286 for GERD and dysphagia. 439 (64.7%) reported at least 75% improvement in symptoms. 242 (35.6%) underwent endoscopy, 263 (38.7%) used Proton Pump Inhibitors, and 38 (8.54%) used Polyethylene Glycol-3350. Carbohydrate eliminations of various types were used in 13.5 - 27% of subjects with pain. 193 subjects (28.5%) were ultimately lost to follow up though some did report improvement in symptoms. Only 45 (6.6%) remained in active care by the end of the study while only 13 (1.93%) were transitioned to an Adult Gastroenterologist at 18 years old. Conclusions Pediatric Abdominal Pain is primarily a transitory population in the Pediatric GI clinic, with a large number responding to successive interventions. There is also a sizable minority who are lost to follow up. Future studies should attempt to identify the reasons for loss to follow up and ultimate disposition. Funding Agencies William Osler Health System Summer Student Research Program","PeriodicalId":508018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":"54 ","pages":"51 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwad061.075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Abdominal pain accounts for 50% of pediatric gastroenterology consultations. While data exists on the possible etiologies of abdominal pain, there is a paucity of data on the natural evolution of abdominal pain while under the care of a Pediatric Gastroenterologist. Given limited access to Pediatric Gastroenterologists and long waiting times for initial consultation for abdominal pain, understanding what interventions ameliorate pain may help Gastroenterologists advise referring physicians while the patient awaits a consultation. Aims Primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients who reported at least a 75% subjective improvement of pain over baseline consultation. Methods A retrospective chart review between April 2014 and Dec 31, 2022 was taken in a hospital based GI clinic. Subjects referred for assessment of abdominal pain were identified, along with subjects referred for reflux and dysphagia as a comparator group. Subsequent visits were abstracted to identify diagnosis disposition and assess which interventions were tried and to what extent they succeeded. Patient loss to follow up were also measured. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics, and regression modeling will be attempted to identify predictors of response. Results 393 subjects were referred for abdominal pain and 286 for GERD and dysphagia. 439 (64.7%) reported at least 75% improvement in symptoms. 242 (35.6%) underwent endoscopy, 263 (38.7%) used Proton Pump Inhibitors, and 38 (8.54%) used Polyethylene Glycol-3350. Carbohydrate eliminations of various types were used in 13.5 - 27% of subjects with pain. 193 subjects (28.5%) were ultimately lost to follow up though some did report improvement in symptoms. Only 45 (6.6%) remained in active care by the end of the study while only 13 (1.93%) were transitioned to an Adult Gastroenterologist at 18 years old. Conclusions Pediatric Abdominal Pain is primarily a transitory population in the Pediatric GI clinic, with a large number responding to successive interventions. There is also a sizable minority who are lost to follow up. Future studies should attempt to identify the reasons for loss to follow up and ultimate disposition. Funding Agencies William Osler Health System Summer Student Research Program
A75 在医院消化道门诊就诊的小儿腹痛:演变与处置
摘要 背景 腹痛占儿科消化内科就诊人数的 50%。虽然有数据表明腹痛可能是由多种病因引起的,但关于腹痛在接受儿科胃肠病医生治疗期间的自然演变过程的数据却很少。由于小儿胃肠病学专家的诊治机会有限,而且腹痛患者初次就诊的等待时间较长,因此,了解哪些干预措施可以缓解疼痛,可能有助于胃肠病学专家在患者等待就诊期间向转诊医生提供建议。目的 主要结果指标是与基线咨询相比疼痛主观改善至少 75% 的患者比例。方法 在一家医院的消化道门诊对 2014 年 4 月至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间的病历进行回顾性分析。确定了因评估腹痛而转诊的受试者,并将因反流和吞咽困难而转诊的受试者作为参照组。对随后的就诊情况进行摘录,以确定诊断处置,并评估尝试了哪些干预措施以及干预措施的成功程度。此外,还对患者的随访损失进行了测量。使用描述性统计对结果进行总结,并尝试建立回归模型以确定反应的预测因素。结果 393 名受试者因腹痛而转诊,286 名受试者因胃食管反流和吞咽困难而转诊。439人(64.7%)报告症状至少改善了75%。242人(35.6%)接受了内窥镜检查,263人(38.7%)使用了质子泵抑制剂,38人(8.54%)使用了聚乙二醇-3350。13.5%-27%的疼痛受试者使用了各种类型的碳水化合物消除剂。有 193 名受试者(28.5%)最终失去了随访机会,尽管其中一些人表示症状有所改善。研究结束时,只有 45 名受试者(6.6%)仍在接受积极治疗,而只有 13 名受试者(1.93%)在 18 岁时转至成人消化科医生处接受治疗。结论 小儿腹痛主要是小儿消化科门诊中的过渡性人群,其中很多人对连续的干预措施做出了反应。也有相当一部分人失去了随访机会。未来的研究应尝试找出失去随访机会的原因和最终处置方法。资助机构 威廉-奥斯勒医疗系统暑期学生研究计划
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信