Transfusion in Radical Cystectomy Increases Overall Morbidity and Mortality: A Retrospective Study Using Data from the American College of Surgeons—National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

C. Ayoub, Nassib F. Abou Heidar, A. Armache, E. Abou Chawareb, A. El Hajj
{"title":"Transfusion in Radical Cystectomy Increases Overall Morbidity and Mortality: A Retrospective Study Using Data from the American College of Surgeons—National Surgical Quality Improvement Program","authors":"C. Ayoub, Nassib F. Abou Heidar, A. Armache, E. Abou Chawareb, A. El Hajj","doi":"10.3390/siuj5010008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Radical cystectomy is a complex procedure imposing significant post-operation complications. Objective: Explore the impact of peri-operative pRBC transfusion on mortality and overall morbidity in a matched cohort. Methods: The American College of Surgeons—National Surgical Quality Improvement Program’s (ACS-NSQIP) dataset was used to select patients who underwent RC in 2008–2019. Patients who witnessed pre-operative transfusion and emergency cases were excluded. Peri-operative pRBC transfusion was defined as an intra-operative or up to 24-h post-operative pRBC transfusion. We matched patients who underwent peri-operative pRBC transfusion to patients who did not receive transfusion. Length of stay, mortality, and overall morbidity were compared between the two matched cohorts. Results: The match cohort was matched on all pre-operative demographics and medical history variables and yielded 3578 matched patients. Patients who underwent peri-operative pRBC transfusion had a longer length of hospital stay (9.3 days) as compared to patients who did not undergo transfusion (8.13 days) (p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients who underwent transfusion also had higher odds of mortality (OR = 1.934) and overall morbidity (OR = 1.443) (p < 0.03). Specifically, patients who underwent transfusion had higher odds of organ space SSI, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, pulmonary embolism, failure to wean off of ventilator, renal insufficiency, urinary tract infections, stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest requiring CPR, deep vein thrombosis, and septic shock (p < 0.047). Conclusion: Peri-operative pRBC transfusion in RC was associated with longer hospital stays, significant morbidity, and mortality. For this reason, pre-operative patient optimization and possible alternatives to common pRBC practices should be considered in RC to circumvent complications.","PeriodicalId":21961,"journal":{"name":"Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/siuj5010008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radical cystectomy is a complex procedure imposing significant post-operation complications. Objective: Explore the impact of peri-operative pRBC transfusion on mortality and overall morbidity in a matched cohort. Methods: The American College of Surgeons—National Surgical Quality Improvement Program’s (ACS-NSQIP) dataset was used to select patients who underwent RC in 2008–2019. Patients who witnessed pre-operative transfusion and emergency cases were excluded. Peri-operative pRBC transfusion was defined as an intra-operative or up to 24-h post-operative pRBC transfusion. We matched patients who underwent peri-operative pRBC transfusion to patients who did not receive transfusion. Length of stay, mortality, and overall morbidity were compared between the two matched cohorts. Results: The match cohort was matched on all pre-operative demographics and medical history variables and yielded 3578 matched patients. Patients who underwent peri-operative pRBC transfusion had a longer length of hospital stay (9.3 days) as compared to patients who did not undergo transfusion (8.13 days) (p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients who underwent transfusion also had higher odds of mortality (OR = 1.934) and overall morbidity (OR = 1.443) (p < 0.03). Specifically, patients who underwent transfusion had higher odds of organ space SSI, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, pulmonary embolism, failure to wean off of ventilator, renal insufficiency, urinary tract infections, stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest requiring CPR, deep vein thrombosis, and septic shock (p < 0.047). Conclusion: Peri-operative pRBC transfusion in RC was associated with longer hospital stays, significant morbidity, and mortality. For this reason, pre-operative patient optimization and possible alternatives to common pRBC practices should be considered in RC to circumvent complications.
根治性膀胱切除术中的输血会增加总体发病率和死亡率:利用美国外科医生学会-国家外科质量改进计划数据进行的回顾性研究
背景:根治性膀胱切除术是一项复杂的手术,术后并发症较多。目的: 探讨围手术期输注 pRBC 对死亡率和总体发病率的影响:在配对队列中探讨围手术期输注 pRBC 对死亡率和总体发病率的影响。方法:利用美国外科医生学会-国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据集选择 2008-2019 年接受 RC 手术的患者。排除了术前输血的患者和急诊病例。围手术期 pRBC 输血定义为术中或术后 24 小时内的 pRBC 输血。我们将接受围手术期 pRBC 输血的患者与未接受输血的患者进行配对。我们比较了两组配对患者的住院时间、死亡率和总体发病率。结果匹配队列在所有术前人口统计学和病史变量上都是匹配的,共有 3578 名匹配患者。与未输血的患者(8.13 天)相比,围手术期输注 pRBC 的患者住院时间更长(9.3 天)(p < 0.001)。此外,输血患者的死亡率(OR = 1.934)和总发病率(OR = 1.443)也较高(P < 0.03)。具体而言,接受输血的患者发生器官间隙 SSI、肺炎、意外插管、肺栓塞、呼吸机断流失败、肾功能不全、尿路感染、中风、心肌梗塞、需要心肺复苏的心脏骤停、深静脉血栓和脓毒性休克的几率更高(P < 0.047)。结论脊髓灰质炎患者围手术期输注 pRBC 与住院时间延长、严重的发病率和死亡率有关。因此,在急诊手术中应考虑对患者进行术前优化,并采用可能替代普通 pRBC 的做法,以避免并发症的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信