A31 DYSPLASIA IN COLONIC POLYPS: PREPARING FOR A RESECT AND DISCARD STRATEGY IN CANADA

V Patel, R. Bechara, M. S. Rai
{"title":"A31 DYSPLASIA IN COLONIC POLYPS: PREPARING FOR A RESECT AND DISCARD STRATEGY IN CANADA","authors":"V Patel, R. Bechara, M. S. Rai","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwad061.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background While diminutive colorectal polyps have a negligible cancer risk, current management involves resecting and submitting all polyps for histological assessment. This is a substantial burden and cost to the healthcare system. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) has recommended a “resect-and-discard strategy” without histological evaluation as an acceptable strategy when high-confidence endoscopic characterization of colorectal polyps is achieved. However, a resect and discard strategy has not been adopted yet in Canada. Aims The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of polyps removed at our center based on size. Methods We retrospectively reviewed colonoscopies and pathology reports at Kingston Health Sciences Center from January to December 2020. Based on the pathology report, polyps were classified as diminutive (1-5mm), small (6-9mm) or large (ampersand:003E or = 10mm). We recorded histology and the presence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or cancer. Results Out of 2218 colonoscopies, 2945 polyps were removed. 1703 (57.8%) polyps were diminutive with only two (0.1%) having focal HGD and none having cancer. 699 (23.7%) polyps were classified as small with three (0.4%) having HGD and none having cancer. The large polyp group had 543 (18.4%) polyps, of which 87 (16%) showed HGD and 15 (2.8%) exhibited cancer. The specific histologic findings are shown in Table 1. Endoscopy reports specifically mentioned concern of dysplasia in one out of the five polyps with HGD in the diminutive and small groups. Conclusions As expected, most polyps were either diminutive or small (81.5%). Neither of these groups had cancer and only 5 had HGD. Adopting a resect and discard strategy at our center for diminutive polyps has the potential for significant cost savings with negligible risk of missing a high-risk polyp. The next steps would involve assessing optical diagnosis sensitivity and specificity for diminutive and small polyps. Histological characterization of polyps within each size range Histology Diminutive (1-5mm) Small (6-9mm) Large (≥10mm) Tubular adenoma 1212 (71.2%) 459 (65.7%) 274 (50.5%) Tubular adenoma with HGD 1 (0.1%) 2 (0.3%) 32 (5.9%) Hyperplastic 347 (20.4%) 100 (14.3%) 29 (5.3%) Sessile Serrated 107 (6.3%) 107 (15.3%) 73 (13.4%) Sessile Serrated with HGD 1 (0.1%) 0 4 (0.7%) Tubulovillous 19 (1.1%) 25 (3.6%) 77 (14.2%) Tubulovillous with HGD 0 1 (0.1%) 36 (6.6%) Inflammatory 16 (0.9%) 5 (0.7%) 3 (0.6%) Adenocarcinoma 0 0 15 (2.8%) Total 1703 699 543 Funding Agencies None","PeriodicalId":508018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":"95 2","pages":"17 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwad061.031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background While diminutive colorectal polyps have a negligible cancer risk, current management involves resecting and submitting all polyps for histological assessment. This is a substantial burden and cost to the healthcare system. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) has recommended a “resect-and-discard strategy” without histological evaluation as an acceptable strategy when high-confidence endoscopic characterization of colorectal polyps is achieved. However, a resect and discard strategy has not been adopted yet in Canada. Aims The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of polyps removed at our center based on size. Methods We retrospectively reviewed colonoscopies and pathology reports at Kingston Health Sciences Center from January to December 2020. Based on the pathology report, polyps were classified as diminutive (1-5mm), small (6-9mm) or large (ampersand:003E or = 10mm). We recorded histology and the presence of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or cancer. Results Out of 2218 colonoscopies, 2945 polyps were removed. 1703 (57.8%) polyps were diminutive with only two (0.1%) having focal HGD and none having cancer. 699 (23.7%) polyps were classified as small with three (0.4%) having HGD and none having cancer. The large polyp group had 543 (18.4%) polyps, of which 87 (16%) showed HGD and 15 (2.8%) exhibited cancer. The specific histologic findings are shown in Table 1. Endoscopy reports specifically mentioned concern of dysplasia in one out of the five polyps with HGD in the diminutive and small groups. Conclusions As expected, most polyps were either diminutive or small (81.5%). Neither of these groups had cancer and only 5 had HGD. Adopting a resect and discard strategy at our center for diminutive polyps has the potential for significant cost savings with negligible risk of missing a high-risk polyp. The next steps would involve assessing optical diagnosis sensitivity and specificity for diminutive and small polyps. Histological characterization of polyps within each size range Histology Diminutive (1-5mm) Small (6-9mm) Large (≥10mm) Tubular adenoma 1212 (71.2%) 459 (65.7%) 274 (50.5%) Tubular adenoma with HGD 1 (0.1%) 2 (0.3%) 32 (5.9%) Hyperplastic 347 (20.4%) 100 (14.3%) 29 (5.3%) Sessile Serrated 107 (6.3%) 107 (15.3%) 73 (13.4%) Sessile Serrated with HGD 1 (0.1%) 0 4 (0.7%) Tubulovillous 19 (1.1%) 25 (3.6%) 77 (14.2%) Tubulovillous with HGD 0 1 (0.1%) 36 (6.6%) Inflammatory 16 (0.9%) 5 (0.7%) 3 (0.6%) Adenocarcinoma 0 0 15 (2.8%) Total 1703 699 543 Funding Agencies None
结肠息肉中的 A31 发育不良:加拿大准备采取切除和丢弃战略
摘要 背景 虽然微小的结直肠息肉患癌症的风险微乎其微,但目前的治疗方法包括切除所有息肉并提交组织学评估。这给医疗系统带来了沉重的负担和成本。欧洲消化内镜学会(ESGE)建议,在对结直肠息肉进行高置信度内镜定性时,可采用 "切除-丢弃策略",不进行组织学评估。然而,加拿大尚未采用切除和丢弃策略。目的 本研究旨在确定本中心根据息肉大小切除息肉的发生率和特征。方法 我们回顾性地查看了金斯顿健康科学中心 2020 年 1 月至 12 月期间的结肠镜检查和病理报告。根据病理报告,息肉被分为小息肉(1-5 毫米)、小息肉(6-9 毫米)和大息肉(安培:003E 或 = 10 毫米)。我们记录了组织学以及是否存在高级别发育不良(HGD)或癌症。结果 在 2218 例结肠镜检查中,2945 例息肉被切除。1703枚(57.8%)息肉体积较小,只有2枚(0.1%)息肉有局灶性HGD,没有息肉发生癌变。699个(23.7%)息肉被归类为小息肉,其中3个(0.4%)有HGD,无癌变。大息肉组有 543 个(18.4%)息肉,其中 87 个(16%)显示有 HGD,15 个(2.8%)显示有癌症。具体的组织学检查结果见表 1。内镜检查报告特别提到,在 5 个有 HGD 的息肉中,有 1 个是小息肉组和小息肉组中的发育不良息肉。结论 不出所料,大多数息肉为微小息肉或小息肉(81.5%)。这两组息肉都没有癌变,只有 5 个息肉有 HGD。在我们中心对微小息肉采取切除和丢弃策略有可能大大节约成本,而漏诊高风险息肉的风险几乎可以忽略不计。下一步将对微小息肉的光学诊断敏感性和特异性进行评估。各大小范围内息肉的组织学特征 小(1-5mm) 小(6-9mm) 大(≥10mm) 管状腺瘤 1212(71.2%) 459(65.7%) 274(50.5%) 管状腺瘤伴 HGD 1(0.1%) 2(0.3%) 32(5.9%) 增生性 347(20.4%) 100(14.3%) 29(5.3%) 无柄锯齿状 107 (6.3%) 107 (15.3%) 73 (13.4%) 无柄锯齿状伴 HGD 1 (0.1%) 0 4 (0.7%) 管状乳头状 19 (1.1%) 25 (3.6%) 77 (14. 2%) 管状乳头状瘤0 1 (0.1%) 36 (6.6%) 炎性 16 (0.9%) 5 (0.7%) 3 (0.6%) 腺癌 0 0 15 (2.8%) 总计 1703 699 543 资助机构 无
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信