Development of passenger’s waiting time model at Bus Public Transit Terminal

M.N. Ibrahim, J.K. Ede
{"title":"Development of passenger’s waiting time model at Bus Public Transit Terminal","authors":"M.N. Ibrahim, J.K. Ede","doi":"10.4314/njt.v42i4.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Passenger’s waiting time at terminal is a key constituent of travel time, as long waiting time increases the overall journey time. In Nigeria,  urban-rural bus transit system is associated with long waiting time. This study evaluates bus transit users’ waiting times at  terminal with perceived and actual waiting times (PWT and AWT) along with associated bus service frequency (BSF). Bus public transit  operating from Enugu city (as origin) to 6 local government areas (Awgu, Isi-Uzo, Nkanu west, Nsukka, Oji River and Udenu) of the state  as destinations was studied. Data were collected on AWT and PWT at Old Park, Enugu for 30 days from 8 am to 6 pm (5 days per route).  Data on AWT and PWT were collected based on passenger’s observation and oral interview, respectively. The study discovered that transit  users incurred long waiting times, with 80 – 90% of the users incurring AWT of 21 minutes to 1 hour and more, indicating a poor service quality. Also, 80 – 90% of the users overestimated their PWT by 25 – 60%. At 95% confidence level, PWT is significantly longer than  AWT (P < 0.05) for all the routes. A passenger’s perceived waiting time model was developed for predicting PWT based on AWT. The  model developed showed that PWT is strongly correlated with AWT, with an R2 = 0.9591 and F-significance < 0.05. This suggests that that  AWT accounts for 96% variability in PWT. Consequently, the model developed exhibits a reasonable accuracy, hence, can be applied for prediction of passenger’s perceived waiting time. The mean BSF for Enugu – Nsukka and Enugu – Oji River routes were 30 and 21 buses  per day, respectively. While, the other 4 routes recorded lower values of 7 – 9 buses per day, resulting in longer waiting times than the  other 2 routes. The implication of long passengers’ waiting time suggests the need for shifting from unscheduled to scheduled operation  and improved BSF by shortening bus headways to minimize waiting time. ","PeriodicalId":33360,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Technology","volume":"42 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v42i4.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Passenger’s waiting time at terminal is a key constituent of travel time, as long waiting time increases the overall journey time. In Nigeria,  urban-rural bus transit system is associated with long waiting time. This study evaluates bus transit users’ waiting times at  terminal with perceived and actual waiting times (PWT and AWT) along with associated bus service frequency (BSF). Bus public transit  operating from Enugu city (as origin) to 6 local government areas (Awgu, Isi-Uzo, Nkanu west, Nsukka, Oji River and Udenu) of the state  as destinations was studied. Data were collected on AWT and PWT at Old Park, Enugu for 30 days from 8 am to 6 pm (5 days per route).  Data on AWT and PWT were collected based on passenger’s observation and oral interview, respectively. The study discovered that transit  users incurred long waiting times, with 80 – 90% of the users incurring AWT of 21 minutes to 1 hour and more, indicating a poor service quality. Also, 80 – 90% of the users overestimated their PWT by 25 – 60%. At 95% confidence level, PWT is significantly longer than  AWT (P < 0.05) for all the routes. A passenger’s perceived waiting time model was developed for predicting PWT based on AWT. The  model developed showed that PWT is strongly correlated with AWT, with an R2 = 0.9591 and F-significance < 0.05. This suggests that that  AWT accounts for 96% variability in PWT. Consequently, the model developed exhibits a reasonable accuracy, hence, can be applied for prediction of passenger’s perceived waiting time. The mean BSF for Enugu – Nsukka and Enugu – Oji River routes were 30 and 21 buses  per day, respectively. While, the other 4 routes recorded lower values of 7 – 9 buses per day, resulting in longer waiting times than the  other 2 routes. The implication of long passengers’ waiting time suggests the need for shifting from unscheduled to scheduled operation  and improved BSF by shortening bus headways to minimize waiting time. 
开发公交总站乘客候车时间模型
乘客在终点站的等候时间是旅行时间的重要组成部分,因为等候时间过长会增加整个旅程的时间。在尼日利亚,城乡公交系统的候车时间较长。本研究通过感知等待时间(PWT)和实际等待时间(AWT)以及相关的公交服务频率(BSF)来评估公交用户在终点站的等待时间。研究对象为从埃努古市(始发站)到该州 6 个地方政府所在地(阿乌古、伊西乌佐、恩卡努西、恩苏卡、奥吉河和乌德努)(终点站)的公共汽车。在埃努古老公园收集了 30 天的 AWT 和 PWT 数据,时间为上午 8 点至下午 6 点(每条线路 5 天)。 对 AWT 和 PWT 的数据收集分别基于对乘客的观察和口头访谈。研究发现,公交用户的候车时间较长,80-90% 的用户平均候车时间为 21 分钟至 1 小时或更长,表明服务质量较差。此外,80% - 90% 的用户高估了 25% - 60% 的公共交通周转时间。在 95% 的置信水平下,所有路線的 PWT 都明顯較 AWT 長(P < 0.05)。根据平均候车时间,开发了一个乘客感知等候时间模型,用于预测乘客感知等候时间。所建立的模型显示,乘客感知等待时间与平均等待时间密切相关,R2 = 0.9591,F 显著性 < 0.05。这表明 AWT 占脉搏波速度变异的 96%。因此,所建立的模型具有合理的准确性,可用于预测乘客的感知等待时间。埃努古 - 恩苏卡和埃努古 - 奥吉河线路的平均 BSF 分别为每天 30 辆和 21 辆巴士。而其他 4 条线路的平均值较低,为每天 7 至 9 辆巴士,因此候车时间比其他 2 条线路更长。乘客候车时间过长的影响表明,有必要将不定期运营转变为定期运营,并通过缩短巴士间隔时间来改进 BSF,以尽量减少候车时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信