A283 HETEROGENEITY OF TREATMENT RESPONSE TO BETA-BLOCKERS IN THE TREATMENT OF PORTAL HYPERTENSION RELATED TO CIRRHOSIS

M. Alsaeid, J. Abraldes
{"title":"A283 HETEROGENEITY OF TREATMENT RESPONSE TO BETA-BLOCKERS IN THE TREATMENT OF PORTAL HYPERTENSION RELATED TO CIRRHOSIS","authors":"M. Alsaeid, J. Abraldes","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwad061.283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Non-selective beta-blockers (BB) improve clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. However, it has been suggested that only a proportion of patients treated with BB benefit from them. Indeed, patients who achieve a ampersand:003E20% reduction in Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) with BB have an excellent prognosis, but only 30-50% achieve such response. This has been suggested as a reason for not using BB where no HVPG measurements are available. Aims In this study we aimed to quantify how heterogeneous is the response to BB in patients with cirrhosis, by analyzing trials in which the effects of BB on HVPG were compared with those of placebo. Methods For assessing the potential heterogeneity of treatment response to BB we conducted a meta-analysis of differences in variance between trial arms. The degree of heterogeneity of HVPG response to BB was quantified with the pooled variability ratio (VR) (SD of the HVPG at the end of the trial in the BB group divided by that in the placebo group). Results Our systematic search yielded 18 studies. Figure 1 shows a forest plot with the meta-analysis of the variability ratios (VR) in final HVPG. Pooled VR was 0.99 (95% CI 0.87-1.14). This indicates that there was no evidence for a higher average variability in the final HVPG in the beta-blocker treatment groups as compared to placebo groups, and hence there was no evidence to support that patients with cirrhosis exhibit a heterogeneous response to beta-blockers (i.e. there is no evidence to support that some patients responded to beta-blockers and others did not). Conclusions In conclusion, the analysis of RCTs comparing the HVPG response of beta-blockers with placebo in patients with cirrhosis does not suggest a heterogeneous hemodynamic response to beta-blockers. This, together with the fact that in most RCTs demonstrating the clinical benefits of beta-blockers treatment was not adjusted based on HVPG response, further supports the concept that there is no need to perform portal pressure measurements to guide treatment with beta-blockers. Funding Agencies None","PeriodicalId":508018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":"178 ","pages":"228 - 229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwad061.283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Non-selective beta-blockers (BB) improve clinical outcomes in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. However, it has been suggested that only a proportion of patients treated with BB benefit from them. Indeed, patients who achieve a ampersand:003E20% reduction in Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) with BB have an excellent prognosis, but only 30-50% achieve such response. This has been suggested as a reason for not using BB where no HVPG measurements are available. Aims In this study we aimed to quantify how heterogeneous is the response to BB in patients with cirrhosis, by analyzing trials in which the effects of BB on HVPG were compared with those of placebo. Methods For assessing the potential heterogeneity of treatment response to BB we conducted a meta-analysis of differences in variance between trial arms. The degree of heterogeneity of HVPG response to BB was quantified with the pooled variability ratio (VR) (SD of the HVPG at the end of the trial in the BB group divided by that in the placebo group). Results Our systematic search yielded 18 studies. Figure 1 shows a forest plot with the meta-analysis of the variability ratios (VR) in final HVPG. Pooled VR was 0.99 (95% CI 0.87-1.14). This indicates that there was no evidence for a higher average variability in the final HVPG in the beta-blocker treatment groups as compared to placebo groups, and hence there was no evidence to support that patients with cirrhosis exhibit a heterogeneous response to beta-blockers (i.e. there is no evidence to support that some patients responded to beta-blockers and others did not). Conclusions In conclusion, the analysis of RCTs comparing the HVPG response of beta-blockers with placebo in patients with cirrhosis does not suggest a heterogeneous hemodynamic response to beta-blockers. This, together with the fact that in most RCTs demonstrating the clinical benefits of beta-blockers treatment was not adjusted based on HVPG response, further supports the concept that there is no need to perform portal pressure measurements to guide treatment with beta-blockers. Funding Agencies None
A283 治疗肝硬化相关门脉高压时对β-受体阻滞剂反应的异质性
摘要 背景 非选择性β-受体阻滞剂(BB)可改善肝硬化和门静脉高压症患者的临床疗效。然而,有研究表明,只有一部分接受β-受体阻滞剂治疗的患者能从中获益。事实上,肝静脉压阶差(HVPG)在使用β-受体阻滞剂治疗后降低ampersand:003E20%的患者预后极佳,但只有30%-50%的患者能达到这种效果。这被认为是在无法测量 HVPG 的情况下不使用 BB 的原因。目的 在本研究中,我们旨在通过分析 BB 对 HVPG 的影响与安慰剂的影响进行比较的试验,量化肝硬化患者对 BB 反应的异质性。方法 为了评估BB治疗反应的潜在异质性,我们对不同试验间的差异进行了荟萃分析。HVPG对BB治疗反应的异质性程度用汇总变异比(VR)(试验结束时BB组HVPG的SD除以安慰剂组HVPG的SD)来量化。结果 我们的系统性搜索得出了 18 项研究。图 1 显示了最终 HVPG 变异比 (VR) 的荟萃分析森林图。汇总 VR 为 0.99(95% CI 0.87-1.14)。这表明,没有证据表明与安慰剂组相比,β-受体阻滞剂治疗组最终 HVPG 的平均变异率更高,因此没有证据支持肝硬化患者对β-受体阻滞剂表现出异质性反应(即没有证据支持一些患者对β-受体阻滞剂有反应,而另一些则没有)。结论 总之,对比较肝硬化患者对β-受体阻滞剂和安慰剂的 HVPG 反应的 RCT 分析并不表明对β-受体阻滞剂有异质性的血液动力学反应。这一点,再加上在大多数证明乙型受体阻滞剂临床疗效的研究中,治疗并没有根据 HVPG 反应进行调整,进一步支持了无需进行门脉压力测量来指导乙型受体阻滞剂治疗的观点。资助机构 无
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信