Effect of screening colonoscopy frequency on colorectal cancer mortality in patients with a family history of colorectal cancer

Li Zheng, Bin Li, Ling Lei, Li-Jia Wang, Zhi-Ping Zeng, Jian-Dong Yang
{"title":"Effect of screening colonoscopy frequency on colorectal cancer mortality in patients with a family history of colorectal cancer","authors":"Li Zheng, Bin Li, Ling Lei, Li-Jia Wang, Zhi-Ping Zeng, Jian-Dong Yang","doi":"10.4251/wjgo.v16.i2.354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Colorectal cancer is a common malignant tumor in China, and its incidence in the elderly is increasing annually. Inflammatory bowel disease is a group of chronic non-specific intestinal inflammatory diseases, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease.\n AIM\n To assess the effect of screening colonoscopy frequency on colorectal cancer mortality.\n METHODS\n We included the clinicopathological and follow-up data of patients with colorectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic colectomy or open colectomy at our Gastrointestinal Department between January 2019 and December 2022. Surgical indicators, oncological indicators, and survival rates were compared between the groups. The results of 104 patients who met the above criteria were extracted from the database (laparoscopic colectomy group = 63, open colectomy group = 41), and there were no statistically significant differences in the baseline data or follow-up time between the two groups.\n RESULTS\n Intraoperative blood loss, time to first ambulation, and time to first fluid intake were significantly lower in the laparoscopic colectomy group than in the open colectomy group. The differences in overall mortality, tumor-related mortality, and recurrence rates between the two groups were not statistically significant, and survival analysis showed that the differences in the cumulative overall survival, tumor-related survival, and cumulative recurrence-free rates between the two groups were not statistically significant.\n CONCLUSION\n In elderly patients with colorectal cancer, laparoscopic colectomy has better short-term outcomes than open colectomy, and laparoscopic colectomy has superior long-term survival outcomes compared with open colectomy.","PeriodicalId":504226,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology","volume":"690 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v16.i2.354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is a common malignant tumor in China, and its incidence in the elderly is increasing annually. Inflammatory bowel disease is a group of chronic non-specific intestinal inflammatory diseases, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. AIM To assess the effect of screening colonoscopy frequency on colorectal cancer mortality. METHODS We included the clinicopathological and follow-up data of patients with colorectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic colectomy or open colectomy at our Gastrointestinal Department between January 2019 and December 2022. Surgical indicators, oncological indicators, and survival rates were compared between the groups. The results of 104 patients who met the above criteria were extracted from the database (laparoscopic colectomy group = 63, open colectomy group = 41), and there were no statistically significant differences in the baseline data or follow-up time between the two groups. RESULTS Intraoperative blood loss, time to first ambulation, and time to first fluid intake were significantly lower in the laparoscopic colectomy group than in the open colectomy group. The differences in overall mortality, tumor-related mortality, and recurrence rates between the two groups were not statistically significant, and survival analysis showed that the differences in the cumulative overall survival, tumor-related survival, and cumulative recurrence-free rates between the two groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION In elderly patients with colorectal cancer, laparoscopic colectomy has better short-term outcomes than open colectomy, and laparoscopic colectomy has superior long-term survival outcomes compared with open colectomy.
结肠镜筛查频率对有结肠直肠癌家族史患者结肠直肠癌死亡率的影响
背景 大肠癌是我国常见的恶性肿瘤,其在老年人中的发病率呈逐年上升趋势。炎症性肠病是一组慢性非特异性肠道炎症性疾病,包括溃疡性结肠炎和克罗恩病。目的 评估结肠镜筛查频率对结直肠癌死亡率的影响。方法 我们纳入了2019年1月至2022年12月期间在我院消化科接受腹腔镜结肠切除术或开腹结肠切除术的结直肠癌患者的临床病理和随访数据。比较了两组患者的手术指标、肿瘤学指标和生存率。从数据库中提取了符合上述标准的104例患者的结果(腹腔镜结肠切除术组=63例,开腹结肠切除术组=41例),两组患者的基线数据和随访时间差异无统计学意义。结果 腹腔镜结肠切除术组的术中失血量、首次下床活动时间和首次摄入液体时间明显低于开腹结肠切除术组。两组的总死亡率、肿瘤相关死亡率和复发率差异无统计学意义,生存分析表明,两组的累积总生存率、肿瘤相关生存率和累积无复发率差异无统计学意义。结论 对于老年结直肠癌患者,腹腔镜结肠切除术的短期疗效优于开腹结肠切除术,腹腔镜结肠切除术的长期生存疗效优于开腹结肠切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信