Flirting and winking in Tinder chats

IF 1.1 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Will Gibson
{"title":"Flirting and winking in Tinder chats","authors":"Will Gibson","doi":"10.1075/ip.00107.gib","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Existing research across the diverse field(s) of ‘discourse studies’ has started to explore the communicative\n orders and sequential practices surrounding emoji use (Skovholt, Grønning and Kankaanranta\n 2014; Herring and Dainas 2017; Gibson,\n Huang and Yu 2018; Sampietro 2019). However, researchers have not yet\n systematically analysed one of the demonstrable phenomena of emoji, which is their ambiguity as meaning-making devices (Miller et al. 2016; Jaeger et al. 2017). This\n study draws on Conversation Analysis to explore the issue of ambiguity in the use of one particular type of emoji, the wink (e.g.,\n 😉, 🥴, 😜). Drawing on a data corpus of text conversations in Danish and in Spanish by users of the dating app ‘Tinder’, the\n analysis explores the phenomena of ambiguity in relation to the practice of flirting. The paper highlights four possible sources\n of ambiguity: idiosyncratic use, semiotic references, sequential placement, and relationship to ambiguous textual actions. The\n paper ends with reflections on possible future areas of research in the study of emoji and communication.","PeriodicalId":36241,"journal":{"name":"Internet Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00107.gib","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing research across the diverse field(s) of ‘discourse studies’ has started to explore the communicative orders and sequential practices surrounding emoji use (Skovholt, Grønning and Kankaanranta 2014; Herring and Dainas 2017; Gibson, Huang and Yu 2018; Sampietro 2019). However, researchers have not yet systematically analysed one of the demonstrable phenomena of emoji, which is their ambiguity as meaning-making devices (Miller et al. 2016; Jaeger et al. 2017). This study draws on Conversation Analysis to explore the issue of ambiguity in the use of one particular type of emoji, the wink (e.g., 😉, 🥴, 😜). Drawing on a data corpus of text conversations in Danish and in Spanish by users of the dating app ‘Tinder’, the analysis explores the phenomena of ambiguity in relation to the practice of flirting. The paper highlights four possible sources of ambiguity: idiosyncratic use, semiotic references, sequential placement, and relationship to ambiguous textual actions. The paper ends with reflections on possible future areas of research in the study of emoji and communication.
在 Tinder 聊天中调情和眨眼
在 "话语研究 "这一不同领域的现有研究已开始探索围绕表情符号使用的交际秩序和序列实践(Skovholt、Grønning 和 Kankaanranta,2014 年;Herring 和 Dainas,2017 年;Gibson、Huang 和 Yu,2018 年;Sampietro,2019 年)。然而,研究人员尚未系统分析表情符号的一个明显现象,即其作为意义生成工具的模糊性(米勒等人,2016 年;耶格等人,2017 年)。本研究利用会话分析法探讨了眨眼这一特定类型表情符号(如😉、🥴、😜)使用中的歧义问题。本文利用约会应用程序 "Tinder "用户用丹麦语和西班牙语进行的文本对话语料库,分析探讨了与调情实践相关的歧义现象。论文强调了模糊性的四个可能来源:特异性使用、符号学引用、顺序位置以及与模糊文本行为的关系。论文最后对表情符号与交流研究的未来可能研究领域进行了思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internet Pragmatics
Internet Pragmatics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信