Geographical Variation in Ophthalmological Care Correlates to Economic Well-being in Florida

J. Jarstad
{"title":"Geographical Variation in Ophthalmological Care Correlates to Economic Well-being in Florida","authors":"J. Jarstad","doi":"10.46889/joar.2024.5103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study aims to quantify the relationship between economic disadvantage and access to eye care in the state of Florida by synthesizing multiple metrics of care. The access metrics presented can help policymakers target interventions to areas most in need and monitor progress towards improving access.\n\nMaterial and Methods: Data from the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services were analyzed with the Distressed Community Index (DCI), a metric developed by Economic\n\nInnovation Group which stratifies zip codes into 5 levels of economic well-being. An association between DCI and eye providers per capita was assessed using a Kruskal-Wallis test. Included are the 920 Florida zip codes included in the Economic Innovation Group’s Distressed Community Index (DCI). The Economic Innovation Group states all zip codes in the United States with populations greater than 500 are included in the DCI data set.\n\nResults: In Florida, 42.6% of zip codes have neither an ophthalmologist nor an optometrist.\n\nNumber of providers per capita significantly differs by DCI category (p<.001) with areas of lowest deprivation having an average of 0.23 ± 0.37 providers per thousand residents and areas of highest deprivation having 0.09 ± 0.19 providers per thousand. DCI quintiles of highest deprivation were significantly more likely to not have an eye provider (p<.001) with 30.5% of zip codes in the lowest deprivation quintile having no providers vs. 62.2% in that of the highest deprivation quintile.\n\nDiscussion: Findings indicate that economically disadvantaged zip codes have significantly less access to eye care compared to their more affluent counterparts. Given that Florida has the highest current prevalence and projected per capita prevalence of visual impairment, investigation and efforts to maximize access to ophthalmological care is paramount.","PeriodicalId":348405,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmology and Advance Research","volume":"457 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmology and Advance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46889/joar.2024.5103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to quantify the relationship between economic disadvantage and access to eye care in the state of Florida by synthesizing multiple metrics of care. The access metrics presented can help policymakers target interventions to areas most in need and monitor progress towards improving access. Material and Methods: Data from the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services were analyzed with the Distressed Community Index (DCI), a metric developed by Economic Innovation Group which stratifies zip codes into 5 levels of economic well-being. An association between DCI and eye providers per capita was assessed using a Kruskal-Wallis test. Included are the 920 Florida zip codes included in the Economic Innovation Group’s Distressed Community Index (DCI). The Economic Innovation Group states all zip codes in the United States with populations greater than 500 are included in the DCI data set. Results: In Florida, 42.6% of zip codes have neither an ophthalmologist nor an optometrist. Number of providers per capita significantly differs by DCI category (p<.001) with areas of lowest deprivation having an average of 0.23 ± 0.37 providers per thousand residents and areas of highest deprivation having 0.09 ± 0.19 providers per thousand. DCI quintiles of highest deprivation were significantly more likely to not have an eye provider (p<.001) with 30.5% of zip codes in the lowest deprivation quintile having no providers vs. 62.2% in that of the highest deprivation quintile. Discussion: Findings indicate that economically disadvantaged zip codes have significantly less access to eye care compared to their more affluent counterparts. Given that Florida has the highest current prevalence and projected per capita prevalence of visual impairment, investigation and efforts to maximize access to ophthalmological care is paramount.
眼科护理的地域差异与佛罗里达州的经济福利有关
目的:本研究旨在通过综合多种护理指标,量化佛罗里达州的经济劣势与获得眼科护理之间的关系。所提供的就医指标可帮助政策制定者针对最需要的地区采取干预措施,并监测在改善就医条件方面所取得的进展:该指标由经济创新集团(EconomicInnovation Group)开发,将邮政编码划分为 5 个经济福利等级。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验法评估了 DCI 与人均眼科医疗服务提供者之间的关联。其中包括列入经济创新集团贫困社区指数(DCI)的 920 个佛罗里达州邮政编码。经济创新集团称,美国所有人口超过 500 人的邮政编码都被纳入 DCI 数据集:在佛罗里达州,42.6% 的邮政编码既没有眼科医生也没有验光师。人均医疗服务提供者的数量在 DCI 类别中存在显著差异(p<.001),贫困程度最低的地区每千名居民平均拥有 0.23 ± 0.37 名医疗服务提供者,贫困程度最高的地区每千名居民平均拥有 0.09 ± 0.19 名医疗服务提供者。贫困程度最高的五分位数地区没有眼科医疗机构的可能性明显更高(p<.001),贫困程度最低的五分位数地区有 30.5%的邮政编码没有眼科医疗机构,而贫困程度最高的五分位数地区有 62.2%的邮政编码没有眼科医疗机构:讨论:研究结果表明,与较富裕的区相比,经济条件较差的区获得眼科保健的机会要少得多。鉴于佛罗里达州目前和预计的人均视力障碍患病率都是最高的,因此调查和努力最大限度地提供眼科医疗服务至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信