{"title":"Applicability of deep neural networks for lithofacies classification from conventional well logs: An integrated approach","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ptlrs.2024.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Parametric understanding for specifying formation characteristics can be perceived through conventional approaches. Significantly, attributes of reservoir lithology are practiced for hydrocarbon exploration. Well logging is conventional approach which is applicable to predict lithology efficiently as compared to geophysical modeling and petrophysical analysis due to cost effectiveness and suitable interpretation time. However, manual interpretation of lithology identification through well logging data requires domain expertise with an extended length of time for measurement. Therefore, in this study, Deep Neural Network (DNN) has been deployed to automate the lithology identification process from well logging data which would provide support by increasing time-effective for monitoring lithology. DNN model has been developed for predicting formation lithology leading to the optimization of the model through the thorough evaluation of the best parameters and hyperparameters including the number of neurons, number of layers, optimizer, learning rate, dropout values, and activation functions. Accuracy of the model is examined by utilizing different evaluation metrics through the division of the dataset into the subdomains of training, validation and testing. Additionally, an attempt is contributed to remove interception for formation lithology prediction while addressing the imbalanced nature of the associated dataset as well in the training process using class weight. It is assessed that accuracy is not a true and only reliable metric to evaluate the lithology classification model. The model with class weight recognizes all the classes but has low accuracy as well as a low F1-score while LSTM based model has high accuracy as well as a high F1-score.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19756,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096249524000115/pdfft?md5=c4ce8ee0a3e7702bf4c40dd4a2df687b&pid=1-s2.0-S2096249524000115-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Research","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096249524000115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Parametric understanding for specifying formation characteristics can be perceived through conventional approaches. Significantly, attributes of reservoir lithology are practiced for hydrocarbon exploration. Well logging is conventional approach which is applicable to predict lithology efficiently as compared to geophysical modeling and petrophysical analysis due to cost effectiveness and suitable interpretation time. However, manual interpretation of lithology identification through well logging data requires domain expertise with an extended length of time for measurement. Therefore, in this study, Deep Neural Network (DNN) has been deployed to automate the lithology identification process from well logging data which would provide support by increasing time-effective for monitoring lithology. DNN model has been developed for predicting formation lithology leading to the optimization of the model through the thorough evaluation of the best parameters and hyperparameters including the number of neurons, number of layers, optimizer, learning rate, dropout values, and activation functions. Accuracy of the model is examined by utilizing different evaluation metrics through the division of the dataset into the subdomains of training, validation and testing. Additionally, an attempt is contributed to remove interception for formation lithology prediction while addressing the imbalanced nature of the associated dataset as well in the training process using class weight. It is assessed that accuracy is not a true and only reliable metric to evaluate the lithology classification model. The model with class weight recognizes all the classes but has low accuracy as well as a low F1-score while LSTM based model has high accuracy as well as a high F1-score.