Fluid Contamination Transient Analysis

Camilo Gelvez, C. Torres‐Verdín
{"title":"Fluid Contamination Transient Analysis","authors":"Camilo Gelvez, C. Torres‐Verdín","doi":"10.30632/pjv65n1-2024a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Successful in-situ fluid cleanup and sampling operations are commonly driven by a fast and reliable analysis of pressure, rate, and fluid contamination measurements. Techniques such as pressure transient analysis (PTA) provide important information to quantify reservoir complexity, while fluid contamination measurements are commonly overlooked for reservoir description purposes. We introduce a new interpretation technique to relate fluid contamination measurements with near-wellbore fluid-transport properties by identifying early- and late-time flow regimes in fluid contamination and its derivative function. The derivative methods used in PTA inspired the development of the new fluid contamination interpretation method. Contamination transient analysis (CTA) evaluates transient measurements acquired during cleanup of mud-filtrate invasion to infer important reservoir flow conditions. Center-point derivative methods are applied to the fluid pumpout volume and time evolution of fluid contamination to identify flow regimes in cases of water-based mud invading either water- or hydrocarbon-bearing formations. We document synthetic examples of the new interpretation method for seven reservoir cases, numerically simulated to obtain contamination data, namely, homogeneous isotropic reservoir, radial boundaries, vertical boundaries, thin-laminated formations, mud-filtrate invasion radius, petrophysical properties, and permeability anisotropy. Single-phase flow and multiphase flow cases are also compared in the analysis. Reservoir boundaries and features are identified in the flow regimes obtained from the combined interpretation of the fluid contamination derivative (FCD) and the log-log plot of the contamination transform. The seven reservoir cases assume fixed reservoir and operational parameters, such as reservoir geometry, rock properties, fluid properties, invasion radius, time of invasion, maximum pumpout rate, and maximum drawdown pressure, to allow for a controlled sensitivity analysis enabling the identification of cleanup trends. It is emphasized that real-time field conditions could trigger certain limitations of the transient techniques developed in this work, such as noisy downhole formation testing measurements, active mud-filtrate invasion, or tool failure. To validate the assumptions, observations, and results of the numerical simulations, a field case is examined to (a) highlight the value of CTA in real-time fluid sampling operations and (b) further investigate its limitations. An alternative validation of the method is performed by applying the derivative directly to the formation testing measurements during fluid cleanup, reducing the uncertainty in the contamination estimation and the interpretation of transient trends. The new approach of the FCD is an alternative to improve fluid cleanup efficiency and to detect the spatial complexity of the reservoir during real-time downhole fluid sampling. Using log-log plots of fluid contamination and the FCD method, we encounter characteristic slopes defining late-time flow regimes. The spherical flow regime gives rise to a slope of –2/3, which has been previously documented by homogeneous isotropic analytical models. Radial flow exhibits a steeper slope of –3 that can be detected when the vertical limits are attained. Boundary effects are evident when the late-time slope of the FCD is equal to –1/3. In addition to the detection of reservoir boundaries, the CTA techniques developed in this paper enable the identification of reservoir fluid type and shale laminations and provide a foundation for the quantification of invasion radius and permeability anisotropy. It is found that cleanup efficiency could be improved based on contamination transient analysis by identifying the flow regimes taking place in the reservoir during filtrate cleanup, hence improving the prediction of the time required to acquire non-contaminated fluid samples.","PeriodicalId":170688,"journal":{"name":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","volume":"180 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv65n1-2024a2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Successful in-situ fluid cleanup and sampling operations are commonly driven by a fast and reliable analysis of pressure, rate, and fluid contamination measurements. Techniques such as pressure transient analysis (PTA) provide important information to quantify reservoir complexity, while fluid contamination measurements are commonly overlooked for reservoir description purposes. We introduce a new interpretation technique to relate fluid contamination measurements with near-wellbore fluid-transport properties by identifying early- and late-time flow regimes in fluid contamination and its derivative function. The derivative methods used in PTA inspired the development of the new fluid contamination interpretation method. Contamination transient analysis (CTA) evaluates transient measurements acquired during cleanup of mud-filtrate invasion to infer important reservoir flow conditions. Center-point derivative methods are applied to the fluid pumpout volume and time evolution of fluid contamination to identify flow regimes in cases of water-based mud invading either water- or hydrocarbon-bearing formations. We document synthetic examples of the new interpretation method for seven reservoir cases, numerically simulated to obtain contamination data, namely, homogeneous isotropic reservoir, radial boundaries, vertical boundaries, thin-laminated formations, mud-filtrate invasion radius, petrophysical properties, and permeability anisotropy. Single-phase flow and multiphase flow cases are also compared in the analysis. Reservoir boundaries and features are identified in the flow regimes obtained from the combined interpretation of the fluid contamination derivative (FCD) and the log-log plot of the contamination transform. The seven reservoir cases assume fixed reservoir and operational parameters, such as reservoir geometry, rock properties, fluid properties, invasion radius, time of invasion, maximum pumpout rate, and maximum drawdown pressure, to allow for a controlled sensitivity analysis enabling the identification of cleanup trends. It is emphasized that real-time field conditions could trigger certain limitations of the transient techniques developed in this work, such as noisy downhole formation testing measurements, active mud-filtrate invasion, or tool failure. To validate the assumptions, observations, and results of the numerical simulations, a field case is examined to (a) highlight the value of CTA in real-time fluid sampling operations and (b) further investigate its limitations. An alternative validation of the method is performed by applying the derivative directly to the formation testing measurements during fluid cleanup, reducing the uncertainty in the contamination estimation and the interpretation of transient trends. The new approach of the FCD is an alternative to improve fluid cleanup efficiency and to detect the spatial complexity of the reservoir during real-time downhole fluid sampling. Using log-log plots of fluid contamination and the FCD method, we encounter characteristic slopes defining late-time flow regimes. The spherical flow regime gives rise to a slope of –2/3, which has been previously documented by homogeneous isotropic analytical models. Radial flow exhibits a steeper slope of –3 that can be detected when the vertical limits are attained. Boundary effects are evident when the late-time slope of the FCD is equal to –1/3. In addition to the detection of reservoir boundaries, the CTA techniques developed in this paper enable the identification of reservoir fluid type and shale laminations and provide a foundation for the quantification of invasion radius and permeability anisotropy. It is found that cleanup efficiency could be improved based on contamination transient analysis by identifying the flow regimes taking place in the reservoir during filtrate cleanup, hence improving the prediction of the time required to acquire non-contaminated fluid samples.
流体污染瞬态分析
对压力、流速和流体污染测量结果进行快速可靠的分析,通常可以推动现场流体清理和取样作业取得成功。压力瞬态分析(PTA)等技术为量化储层复杂性提供了重要信息,而流体污染测量通常在储层描述中被忽视。我们引入了一种新的解释技术,通过识别流体污染的早期和晚期流动机制及其导函数,将流体污染测量与近井筒流体传输特性联系起来。PTA 中使用的导数方法为开发新的流体污染解释方法提供了灵感。污染瞬态分析(CTA)对清理泥浆-滤饼入侵过程中获得的瞬态测量进行评估,以推断重要的储层流动条件。中心点导数法适用于流体抽出量和流体污染的时间演化,以确定水基泥浆侵入含水或含烃地层时的流动状态。我们记录了新解释方法在七种储层情况下的合成示例,通过数值模拟获得污染数据,即均质各向同性储层、径向边界、垂直边界、薄层地层、泥浆-滤饼入侵半径、岩石物理特性和渗透率各向异性。分析中还对单相流和多相流情况进行了比较。通过对流体污染导数(FCD)和污染变换的对数-对数图的综合解释,确定了流动体系中的储层边界和特征。七个储层案例假定储层和作业参数固定不变,如储层几何形状、岩石性质、流体性质、入侵半径、入侵时间、最大抽出率和最大缩减压力,以便进行受控敏感性分析,从而确定清理趋势。需要强调的是,实时现场条件可能会导致本工作中开发的瞬态技术受到某些限制,例如井下地层测试测量数据嘈杂、泥浆-滤饼主动入侵或工具故障。为了验证数值模拟的假设、观察和结果,对一个现场案例进行了研究,以(a) 突出 CTA 在实时流体取样作业中的价值,(b) 进一步研究其局限性。通过将导数直接应用于流体清理过程中的地层测试测量,减少了污染估计和瞬态趋势解释中的不确定性,从而对该方法进行了替代验证。在实时井下流体取样过程中,FCD 新方法是提高流体清理效率和检测储层空间复杂性的一种替代方法。利用流体污染对数图和 FCD 方法,我们发现了定义晚期流动机制的特征斜率。球形流态的斜率为-2/3,这在之前的均质各向同性分析模型中已有记录。径向流的斜率更陡,为-3,在达到垂直极限时可以检测到。当 FCD 的后期斜率等于-1/3 时,边界效应非常明显。除了储层边界探测之外,本文开发的 CTA 技术还能识别储层流体类型和页岩层理,并为入侵半径和渗透率各向异性的量化奠定基础。研究发现,在污染瞬态分析的基础上,可以通过识别滤液清理过程中储层内的流动状态来提高清理效率,从而改进对获取非污染流体样本所需时间的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信