Investigation of genotype x environment interaction for Hordeum vulgare L. ssp. vulgare recombinant inbred lines in multi-environments of Tigray, Ethiopia

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Hailekiros Tadesse Tekle , Yemane Tsehaye , Genet Atsbeha , Fetien Abay Abera , Rogério Marcos Chiulele
{"title":"Investigation of genotype x environment interaction for Hordeum vulgare L. ssp. vulgare recombinant inbred lines in multi-environments of Tigray, Ethiopia","authors":"Hailekiros Tadesse Tekle ,&nbsp;Yemane Tsehaye ,&nbsp;Genet Atsbeha ,&nbsp;Fetien Abay Abera ,&nbsp;Rogério Marcos Chiulele","doi":"10.1016/j.egg.2024.100231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study examined the impact of 166 barley genotypes on yield performance in Tigray, revealing that year, environmental, and genotype factors significantly influence grain yield per plant (GYP). The analysis used AMMI and GGE biplot models, revealing environment as the dominant factor (95.3%), followed by genotypes (2.8%). The genotypes G126, G60, G108, G64, G52, G12, G62, G104, G47, G10, G83, G66, G39, and G30 were found to be highly productive genotypes showing low interaction with environments (genotypes centered near the origin) for the AMMI2 biplot for the IPCA1 and IPCA2 in GEI. The GGE biplot analysis also showed that top-performing genotypes outperformed in grain yield per plant, while Saesa and Himblil parental varieties fell below the top genotypes with yield scores of 15.34 gm/plant and 16.55 gm/plant, respectively. The IPCA1 and average environment coordination (AEC) scores at Mekelle_2018/19 (E3 &amp; E7), Aleasa_2019 (E6), and Habes_2018/19 (E4 &amp; E8) revealed the most stable environments. Though unstable and distant from AEC, Ayba_2018/19 (E1 and E5) significantly contributed to genotype-environment interaction. GGE-biplot of the \"which-won-where\" showed the 8 environments grouped into 4 mega-environments, with the winning genotypes of each environment being G112 for Ayba_2018, G82 for Aleasa_2018, G25 for Mekelle_2018, G61 for Habes_2018, and G4 for Ayba_2019. Similarly, AMMI biplot analysis revealed high average yields across test locations, with RIL genotypes G36, G72, G25, G118, and G112 showing genetic advancements and potential for future breeding initiatives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37938,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Genetics and Genomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Genetics and Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405985424000156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study examined the impact of 166 barley genotypes on yield performance in Tigray, revealing that year, environmental, and genotype factors significantly influence grain yield per plant (GYP). The analysis used AMMI and GGE biplot models, revealing environment as the dominant factor (95.3%), followed by genotypes (2.8%). The genotypes G126, G60, G108, G64, G52, G12, G62, G104, G47, G10, G83, G66, G39, and G30 were found to be highly productive genotypes showing low interaction with environments (genotypes centered near the origin) for the AMMI2 biplot for the IPCA1 and IPCA2 in GEI. The GGE biplot analysis also showed that top-performing genotypes outperformed in grain yield per plant, while Saesa and Himblil parental varieties fell below the top genotypes with yield scores of 15.34 gm/plant and 16.55 gm/plant, respectively. The IPCA1 and average environment coordination (AEC) scores at Mekelle_2018/19 (E3 & E7), Aleasa_2019 (E6), and Habes_2018/19 (E4 & E8) revealed the most stable environments. Though unstable and distant from AEC, Ayba_2018/19 (E1 and E5) significantly contributed to genotype-environment interaction. GGE-biplot of the "which-won-where" showed the 8 environments grouped into 4 mega-environments, with the winning genotypes of each environment being G112 for Ayba_2018, G82 for Aleasa_2018, G25 for Mekelle_2018, G61 for Habes_2018, and G4 for Ayba_2019. Similarly, AMMI biplot analysis revealed high average yields across test locations, with RIL genotypes G36, G72, G25, G118, and G112 showing genetic advancements and potential for future breeding initiatives.

埃塞俄比亚提格雷地区多环境中 Hordeum vulgare L. ssp. vulgare 重组近交系基因型与环境相互作用的研究
该研究考察了蒂格雷地区 166 种大麦基因型对产量表现的影响,结果表明年份、环境和基因型因素对每株大麦的谷物产量(GYP)有显著影响。分析使用了 AMMI 和 GGE 双图模型,结果显示环境是主导因素(95.3%),其次是基因型(2.8%)。基因型 G126、G60、G108、G64、G52、G12、G62、G104、G47、G10、G83、G66、G39 和 G30 被认为是高产基因型,在 GEI 的 IPCA1 和 IPCA2 的 AMMI2 双图谱中,它们与环境的交互作用较小(基因型的中心在原点附近)。GGE 双图分析还表明,表现最佳的基因型在单株谷物产量方面表现优异,而 Saesa 和 Himblil 亲本品种的产量得分分别为 15.34 克/株和 16.55 克/株,低于最佳基因型。在 Mekelle_2018/19(E3 & E7)、Aleasa_2019(E6)和 Habes_2018/19(E4 & E8),IPCA1 和平均环境协调(AEC)得分显示环境最为稳定。Ayba_2018/19 (E1 和 E5)虽然不稳定且与 AEC 相距甚远,但对基因型与环境的相互作用有显著贡献。GGE 双图谱的 "孰优孰劣 "显示,8 个环境被分为 4 个巨型环境,每个环境的优胜基因型分别是 Ayba_2018 的 G112、Aleasa_2018 的 G82、Mekelle_2018 的 G25、Habes_2018 的 G61 和 Ayba_2019 的 G4。同样,AMMI 双图谱分析表明,各试验地点的平均产量较高,RIL 基因型 G36、G72、G25、G118 和 G112 显示出遗传优势和未来育种计划的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Genetics and Genomics
Ecological Genetics and Genomics Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Ecological Genetics and Genomics publishes ecological studies of broad interest that provide significant insight into ecological interactions or/ and species diversification. New data in these areas are published as research papers, or methods and resource reports that provide novel information on technologies or tools that will be of interest to a broad readership. Complete data sets are shared where appropriate. The journal also provides Reviews, and Perspectives articles, which present commentary on the latest advances published both here and elsewhere, placing such progress in its broader biological context. Topics include: -metagenomics -population genetics/genomics -evolutionary ecology -conservation and molecular adaptation -speciation genetics -environmental and marine genomics -ecological simulation -genomic divergence of organisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信