Correction: Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Outcome and Reoperation Focusing on Extended Versus Limited Initial Repair

M. Elbayomi
{"title":"Correction: Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Outcome and Reoperation Focusing on Extended Versus Limited Initial Repair","authors":"M. Elbayomi","doi":"10.59958/hsf.7317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correction to: Heart Surgery Forum https://journal.hsforum.com/index.php/HSF/article/view/5345, published online 3 March 2023. \nIn this article, there are some text corrections that need to be incorporated. The original article has been corrected. The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper: \nIn the Result section in the Abstract, “Type of the initial repair had no statically significant relationship with in-hospital mortality with a p-value of 0.12, however in multivariable analysis, cross-clamp time had a statistically significant relation with mortality (p = 0.4).” should instead read “Type of the initial repair had no statistically significant relationship with in-hospital mortality with a p-value of 0.12, however in multivariable analysis, cross-clamp time had a statistically significant relation with mortality (p = 0.04). And “The relationship between the type of the initial repair and the need for reoperation didn’t reach a statically significant value (p = 0.9).” should instead read “The relationship between the type of the initial repair and the need for reoperation didn’t reach a statistically significant value (p = 0.9)”. \nThe authors confirm that the mistakes do not affect the results and conclusions of the study and apologize for any inconvenience caused by this mistake.","PeriodicalId":503802,"journal":{"name":"The Heart Surgery Forum","volume":"61 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Heart Surgery Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59958/hsf.7317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Correction to: Heart Surgery Forum https://journal.hsforum.com/index.php/HSF/article/view/5345, published online 3 March 2023. In this article, there are some text corrections that need to be incorporated. The original article has been corrected. The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper: In the Result section in the Abstract, “Type of the initial repair had no statically significant relationship with in-hospital mortality with a p-value of 0.12, however in multivariable analysis, cross-clamp time had a statistically significant relation with mortality (p = 0.4).” should instead read “Type of the initial repair had no statistically significant relationship with in-hospital mortality with a p-value of 0.12, however in multivariable analysis, cross-clamp time had a statistically significant relation with mortality (p = 0.04). And “The relationship between the type of the initial repair and the need for reoperation didn’t reach a statically significant value (p = 0.9).” should instead read “The relationship between the type of the initial repair and the need for reoperation didn’t reach a statistically significant value (p = 0.9)”. The authors confirm that the mistakes do not affect the results and conclusions of the study and apologize for any inconvenience caused by this mistake.
更正:对急性 A 型主动脉夹层结果和再手术的单中心回顾性分析,重点关注扩展型与限制型初始修复术
更正为心脏外科论坛 https://journal.hsforum.com/index.php/HSF/article/view/5345,2023 年 3 月 3 日在线发表。本文中有些文字需要更正。原文已更正。作者希望对本文做如下更正:摘要的结果部分中,"初次修复的类型与院内死亡率无统计学意义(P 值为 0.12),但在多变量分析中,交叉钳夹时间与死亡率有统计学意义(P = 0.4)"应改为 "初次修复的类型与院内死亡率无统计学意义(P 值为 0.12),但在多变量分析中,交叉钳夹时间与死亡率有统计学意义(P = 0.04)"。而 "初次修复类型与再次手术需求之间的关系未达到统计学意义上的显著值(p = 0.9)"应改为 "初次修复类型与再次手术需求之间的关系未达到统计学意义上的显著值(p = 0.9)"。作者确认这些错误不会影响研究结果和结论,并对由此造成的不便表示歉意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信