Surgery patterns and survival of T4N2 non-small cell lung cancer – A population-based analysis

Chenxi Zhang , Meiqing Zhang , Jingxuan Chen , Xiyang Tang , Jincan Zhang , Congwen Zhuang , Xiaofei Li , Zhiyong Zeng , Jinbo Zhao
{"title":"Surgery patterns and survival of T4N2 non-small cell lung cancer – A population-based analysis","authors":"Chenxi Zhang ,&nbsp;Meiqing Zhang ,&nbsp;Jingxuan Chen ,&nbsp;Xiyang Tang ,&nbsp;Jincan Zhang ,&nbsp;Congwen Zhuang ,&nbsp;Xiaofei Li ,&nbsp;Zhiyong Zeng ,&nbsp;Jinbo Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2024.100034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Present study aims to explore the surgery patterns and survival of T4N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in real-world condition.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Clinical stage T4N2 NSCLC patients in Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result Program were extracted. Cox regression was used for calculation of hazard ratio (HR) and confidence interval (CI), and landmark analysis was used for survival test at different cut-off time points.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 1445 eligible patients included, of which 306 patients received surgery alone, 390 patients received induction therapy, and 749 patients received adjuvant therapy. For resection types, 1210 patients received lobectomy and 235 received pneumonectomy. Among patient receiving induction therapy, the overall survival (OS) HRs of pneumonectomy at 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 8-year cut-off points were 1.330, 0.972, 1.231, and 1.332 (P ​= ​0.708, 0.972, 0.281 and 0.145), respectively, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) HRs at these landmark points were 2.386, 1.231, 1.455, and 1.480 (P ​= ​0.293, P ​= ​0.409, 0.059 and 0.056), respectively. Among patients receiving adjuvant therapy, the OS HRs of pneumonectomy at 1-year and 8-year cut-off points were 1.570 and 1.274 (P ​= ​0.050 and 0.087), respectively, and CSS HRs at these landmark points were 1.493 and 1.284 (P ​= ​0.096 and 0.094), respectively. Both OS and CSS of patients receiving lobectomy were superior than pneumonectomy at 3-year and 5-year in this cohort. For patients receiving surgery alone, pneumonectomy resulted in inferior survival than lobectomy at all cut-off points (all P ​&lt; ​0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Surgery after induction therapy is still an optional choice for T4N2 NSCLC, and pneumonectomy should not be excluded from treatment strategy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100034"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X24000023/pdfft?md5=945e1c87a7cb804d2b5eddaec515798f&pid=1-s2.0-S2773160X24000023-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X24000023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Present study aims to explore the surgery patterns and survival of T4N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in real-world condition.

Materials and methods

Clinical stage T4N2 NSCLC patients in Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result Program were extracted. Cox regression was used for calculation of hazard ratio (HR) and confidence interval (CI), and landmark analysis was used for survival test at different cut-off time points.

Results

There were 1445 eligible patients included, of which 306 patients received surgery alone, 390 patients received induction therapy, and 749 patients received adjuvant therapy. For resection types, 1210 patients received lobectomy and 235 received pneumonectomy. Among patient receiving induction therapy, the overall survival (OS) HRs of pneumonectomy at 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 8-year cut-off points were 1.330, 0.972, 1.231, and 1.332 (P ​= ​0.708, 0.972, 0.281 and 0.145), respectively, and cancer-specific survival (CSS) HRs at these landmark points were 2.386, 1.231, 1.455, and 1.480 (P ​= ​0.293, P ​= ​0.409, 0.059 and 0.056), respectively. Among patients receiving adjuvant therapy, the OS HRs of pneumonectomy at 1-year and 8-year cut-off points were 1.570 and 1.274 (P ​= ​0.050 and 0.087), respectively, and CSS HRs at these landmark points were 1.493 and 1.284 (P ​= ​0.096 and 0.094), respectively. Both OS and CSS of patients receiving lobectomy were superior than pneumonectomy at 3-year and 5-year in this cohort. For patients receiving surgery alone, pneumonectomy resulted in inferior survival than lobectomy at all cut-off points (all P ​< ​0.05).

Conclusions

Surgery after induction therapy is still an optional choice for T4N2 NSCLC, and pneumonectomy should not be excluded from treatment strategy.

T4N2 非小细胞肺癌的手术模式和生存率 - 基于人群的分析
目的本研究旨在探讨真实世界中T4N2非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的手术模式和生存情况。材料和方法抽取监测、流行病学和最终结果项目中临床分期为T4N2的NSCLC患者。结果共纳入 1445 名符合条件的患者,其中 306 名患者接受了单纯手术治疗,390 名患者接受了诱导治疗,749 名患者接受了辅助治疗。就切除类型而言,1210 名患者接受了肺叶切除术,235 名患者接受了肺切除术。在接受诱导治疗的患者中,肺切除术在1年、3年、5年和8年截断点的总生存率(OS)分别为1.330、0.972、1.231和1.332(P = 0.708、0.972、0.281和0.145),这些标志点的癌症特异性生存(CSS)HRs分别为2.386、1.231、1.455和1.480(P = 0.293、P = 0.409、0.059和0.056)。在接受辅助治疗的患者中,肺切除术在1年和8年截断点的OS HR分别为1.570和1.274(P = 0.050和0.087),在这些标志点的CSS HR分别为1.493和1.284(P = 0.096和0.094)。在该队列中,接受肺叶切除术的患者在3年和5年的OS和CSS均优于肺切除术。结论对于T4N2型NSCLC,诱导治疗后手术仍是一种可选方案,不应将肺切除术排除在治疗策略之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信