A. Fuentes-García, J. Jiménez-Chacón, M. Alvarez-Prieto
{"title":"Use of the Monte Carlo method for the estimation of measurement uncertainty in chemical analysis systems with intensive mathematical treatment","authors":"A. Fuentes-García, J. Jiménez-Chacón, M. Alvarez-Prieto","doi":"10.1007/s00769-023-01572-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In recent years, the scientific community has made great efforts to establish procedures for the estimation of uncertainty in various measurement processes in laboratories. In this regard, the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement has been one of the most widely used documents for the estimation of uncertainty values in measurement processes. In spite of its success, the linear propagation method of uncertainties proposed in this guide presents serious deficiencies when trying to estimate uncertainty in measurement or calibration processes where an intensive mathematical treatment is used, particularly when these introduce important sources of variability. An example of this is the quantification of Sn, Sb and Cu in Babbitt metal by energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence. In this material, Sn and Sb present a strong spectral interference between their different lines, which forces the use of mathematical methods of deconvolution and correction of inter-element effects that introduce sources of variability usually neglected. This work proposes an alternative to the uncertainty quantification based on the Monte Carlo method where the sources of variability resulting from the spectral treatment and matrix effects are included. Methodologies for the establishment of the main practical aspects of the Monte Carlo method and its adaptation to calibration methodologies are also proposed. The influence of disregarding the variability introduced by the spectrum treatment algorithms on the uncertainty estimation is shown.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":454,"journal":{"name":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","volume":"29 2","pages":"87 - 102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-023-01572-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In recent years, the scientific community has made great efforts to establish procedures for the estimation of uncertainty in various measurement processes in laboratories. In this regard, the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement has been one of the most widely used documents for the estimation of uncertainty values in measurement processes. In spite of its success, the linear propagation method of uncertainties proposed in this guide presents serious deficiencies when trying to estimate uncertainty in measurement or calibration processes where an intensive mathematical treatment is used, particularly when these introduce important sources of variability. An example of this is the quantification of Sn, Sb and Cu in Babbitt metal by energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence. In this material, Sn and Sb present a strong spectral interference between their different lines, which forces the use of mathematical methods of deconvolution and correction of inter-element effects that introduce sources of variability usually neglected. This work proposes an alternative to the uncertainty quantification based on the Monte Carlo method where the sources of variability resulting from the spectral treatment and matrix effects are included. Methodologies for the establishment of the main practical aspects of the Monte Carlo method and its adaptation to calibration methodologies are also proposed. The influence of disregarding the variability introduced by the spectrum treatment algorithms on the uncertainty estimation is shown.
近年来,科学界在制定实验室各种测量过程的不确定度估计程序方面做出了巨大努力。在这方面,《测量不确定度表达指南》一直是估算测量过程中不确定度值最广泛使用的文件之一。尽管该指南非常成功,但在使用密集数学处理方法估算测量或校准过程中的不确定度时,尤其是在引入重要变异源时,该指南提出的不确定度线性传播方法存在严重缺陷。通过能量色散 X 射线荧光法量化巴比特金属中的锡、锑和铜就是一个例子。在这种材料中,锡和锑在其不同的光谱线之间会产生强烈的光谱干扰,这就迫使我们使用数学方法进行解卷积和元素间效应的校正,而元素间效应会带来通常被忽视的变异源。这项工作提出了一种基于蒙特卡罗方法的不确定性量化替代方法,其中包括光谱处理和矩阵效应产生的变异源。此外,还提出了建立蒙特卡罗方法主要实用方面的方法,以及使其适应校准方法的方法。忽略光谱处理算法引入的变异性对不确定性估计的影响也得到了展示。
期刊介绍:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance has established itself as the leading information and discussion forum for all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. The journal serves the information needs of researchers, practitioners and decision makers dealing with quality assurance and quality management, including the development and application of metrological principles and concepts such as traceability or measurement uncertainty in the following fields: environment, nutrition, consumer protection, geology, metallurgy, pharmacy, forensics, clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, and microbiology.