Navigating competing goals for language in curricularized school settings: Lessons from teachers of multilingual students

Amanda K. Kibler, M. Sandstead, Sara Wiger, Jane Weiss
{"title":"Navigating competing goals for language in curricularized school settings: Lessons from teachers of multilingual students","authors":"Amanda K. Kibler, M. Sandstead, Sara Wiger, Jane Weiss","doi":"10.1111/modl.12906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As an international phenomenon, standardization has become increasingly prominent, and language has been curricularized through learning progressions, curricula, and high‐stakes assessments. Curricularized systems exist in tension with what we know about how individuals develop language. As scholars have asserted, language development is mediated by students’ motivation, investment, and agency, suggesting that learners’ goals and purposes for communication are key drivers of language learning. A contradiction therefore exists in institutionalized language teaching: How can curricularized goals—that, by definition, are not created for individual students—be negotiated such that students’ own language goals and curricularized ones work together rather than in opposition? We take up recent calls for teacher‐informed research and use qualitative case‐study and constructivist grounded theory to synthesize insights from a set of US elementary teachers teaching in English‐medium classrooms. We engaged in an inquiry‐based professional development initiative with these teachers to explore how they address students’ purposes and goals for language use in the context of the curricularization that takes place in schools. Findings suggest a complex and interdependent set of instructional practices that form a possible pedagogical model that navigates expectations found in curricularized classroom settings with multilingual students.","PeriodicalId":510718,"journal":{"name":"The Modern Language Journal","volume":"19 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Modern Language Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As an international phenomenon, standardization has become increasingly prominent, and language has been curricularized through learning progressions, curricula, and high‐stakes assessments. Curricularized systems exist in tension with what we know about how individuals develop language. As scholars have asserted, language development is mediated by students’ motivation, investment, and agency, suggesting that learners’ goals and purposes for communication are key drivers of language learning. A contradiction therefore exists in institutionalized language teaching: How can curricularized goals—that, by definition, are not created for individual students—be negotiated such that students’ own language goals and curricularized ones work together rather than in opposition? We take up recent calls for teacher‐informed research and use qualitative case‐study and constructivist grounded theory to synthesize insights from a set of US elementary teachers teaching in English‐medium classrooms. We engaged in an inquiry‐based professional development initiative with these teachers to explore how they address students’ purposes and goals for language use in the context of the curricularization that takes place in schools. Findings suggest a complex and interdependent set of instructional practices that form a possible pedagogical model that navigates expectations found in curricularized classroom settings with multilingual students.

Abstract Image

在课程化的学校环境中驾驭相互竞争的语言目标:多语种学生教师的经验教训
作为一种国际现象,标准化已变得日益突出,通过学习进度、课程和高风险评估, 语言已被课程化。课程化系统与我们对个人如何发展语言的了解存在矛盾。正如学者们所断言的那样,语言的发展是以学生的动机、投资和能动性为中介的,这表明学习者的目标和交流目的是语言学习的关键驱动力。因此,在制度化的语言教学中存在着这样一个矛盾:课程化的目标顾名思义并不是为学生个人制定的,如何通过协商使学生自己的语言目标和课程化的目标共同发挥作用,而不是相互对立?最近,我们呼吁开展以教师为信息来源的研究,并利用定性案例研究和建构主义基础理论,综合了在以英语为教学语言的课堂上任教的一组美国小学教师的见解。我们与这些教师共同开展了一项基于探究的专业发展活动,以探讨他们如何在学校课程化的背景下解决学生使用语言的目的和目标问题。研究结果表明,一系列复杂而又相互依存的教学实践形成了一种可能的教学模式,这种模式可以在课程化的课堂环境中引导多语种学生的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信