An analysis on the spatial heterogeneity characteristics of landscape ecological risk in Qilian Mountain National Park

Yanlong Li, Qianqian Qin, Duowen Wang, Wanxiu An, Xiaohui He, Tianquan Yu
{"title":"An analysis on the spatial heterogeneity characteristics of landscape ecological risk in Qilian Mountain National Park","authors":"Yanlong Li, Qianqian Qin, Duowen Wang, Wanxiu An, Xiaohui He, Tianquan Yu","doi":"10.3389/ffgc.2024.1308154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a key ecological function area and a priority area for biodiversity conservation in China, Qilian Mountain National Park is facing a severe test of its ecological environment, and the study of its landscape ecological risk is of great significance to the construction and high-quality development of the Qilian Mountain National Park. In this research, based on land use data from six periods (i.e., year in 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020) in the Qilian Mountain National Park, we divided the ecological risk plots, calculated the landscape pattern, and constructed the landscape ecological risk index to deeply explore the temporal and spatial heterogeneity of landscape ecological risk in Qilian Mountain National Park by using ArcGIS, Fragstats and GeoDa. The results showed that: Grassland is the predominant land use type, the area covered by woodland and grassland have exhibited a significant increase since 1995. Landscape fragmentation and disturbance indices exhibit fluctuations across different years, but showed an overall decreasing trend, and landscape stability was improved in the study area. There were obvious differences in the disturbance indices of different landscape types, with grassland and bare land having the highest values. Ecological risk in the study area is heterogeneous, with an overall low ecological risk and a shift to a lower risk level, and a decreasing trend in ecological risk, which is positively correlated spatially and mainly manifested as a “low-low” aggregation. Global warming and unreasonable human activities have exacerbated the ecological degradation of Qilian Mountain National Park, but a series of ecological restoration strategies after the establishment of the national park have gradually improved the regional ecological environment.","PeriodicalId":507254,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","volume":"5 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1308154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a key ecological function area and a priority area for biodiversity conservation in China, Qilian Mountain National Park is facing a severe test of its ecological environment, and the study of its landscape ecological risk is of great significance to the construction and high-quality development of the Qilian Mountain National Park. In this research, based on land use data from six periods (i.e., year in 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020) in the Qilian Mountain National Park, we divided the ecological risk plots, calculated the landscape pattern, and constructed the landscape ecological risk index to deeply explore the temporal and spatial heterogeneity of landscape ecological risk in Qilian Mountain National Park by using ArcGIS, Fragstats and GeoDa. The results showed that: Grassland is the predominant land use type, the area covered by woodland and grassland have exhibited a significant increase since 1995. Landscape fragmentation and disturbance indices exhibit fluctuations across different years, but showed an overall decreasing trend, and landscape stability was improved in the study area. There were obvious differences in the disturbance indices of different landscape types, with grassland and bare land having the highest values. Ecological risk in the study area is heterogeneous, with an overall low ecological risk and a shift to a lower risk level, and a decreasing trend in ecological risk, which is positively correlated spatially and mainly manifested as a “low-low” aggregation. Global warming and unreasonable human activities have exacerbated the ecological degradation of Qilian Mountain National Park, but a series of ecological restoration strategies after the establishment of the national park have gradually improved the regional ecological environment.
祁连山国家公园景观生态风险的空间异质性特征分析
祁连山国家公园作为我国重点生态功能区和生物多样性保护优先区,其生态环境正面临着严峻的考验,其景观生态风险研究对祁连山国家公园的建设和高质量发展具有重要意义。本研究基于祁连山国家公园1995年、2000年、2005年、2010年、2015年和2020年六个时期的土地利用数据,利用ArcGIS、Fragstats和GeoDa划分生态风险地块,计算景观格局,构建景观生态风险指数,深入探讨祁连山国家公园景观生态风险的时空异质性。结果表明草地是最主要的土地利用类型,林地和草地覆盖面积自 1995 年以来有显著增加。景观破碎度和干扰指数在不同年份有所波动,但总体呈下降趋势,研究区域的景观稳定性有所提高。不同景观类型的干扰指数存在明显差异,草地和裸地的干扰指数值最高。研究区生态风险具有异质性,生态风险总体较低,并向较低风险水平转移,生态风险呈下降趋势,空间上呈正相关,主要表现为 "低-低 "聚集。全球气候变暖和不合理的人类活动加剧了祁连山国家公园的生态退化,但国家公园建立后的一系列生态修复策略逐步改善了区域生态环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信