Assessment of Platelet Indices as Biomarker for Neonatal Sepsis

Q4 Medicine
Brij Bhushan Yadav, B. Maini, Prabhjot Jhinger, B. Gaur
{"title":"Assessment of Platelet Indices as Biomarker for Neonatal Sepsis","authors":"Brij Bhushan Yadav, B. Maini, Prabhjot Jhinger, B. Gaur","doi":"10.1177/09732179241228025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: There is a need to increase the diagnostic capability of the traditional septic screen by adding additional markers. Platelet indices are one such marker that is readily available in routine hemogram reports. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, all newborn babies were recruited who had signs or symptoms of sepsis or had high-risk factors. Those who had clinical sepsis with positive cultures and/or a positive sepsis screen were classified under group “cases” ( n = 174), whereas all neonates suspected to have sepsis but who had a negative blood culture and a negative sepsis screen were classified under group “control” ( n = 126). Blood culture, sepsis screen, and platelet indices [platelet count, mean platelet volume (MPV), and platelet distribution width (PDW)] were performed on all babies. Babies with congenital or acquired causes of platelet abnormalities (including medication use by mothers with antiplatelet activity) were excluded from this study. Results: In this study, a total of 300 newborn babies were recruited for final analyses. Overall culture positivity was 38%. The mean platelet count was lower in the cases group ( P < 0.001). MPV and PDW were higher in septic babies with statistically significant differences ( P < 0.0001 and P = 0.012, respectively). Thrombocytopenia was the most sensitive marker (85.60%). However, it had low specificity (28.2%). On combining all three platelet markers, specificity increased to 48.4% (with a sensitivity of 64.5%) in detecting babies with neonatal sepsis. The sensitivity of the septic screen alone was 58% (with a specificity of 32.62%). When combining the sepsis screen and platelet indices, the specificity for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis increased to 62.6%. On receiver operator curve analyses, thrombocytopenia had the highest area under the curve (0.692), followed by MPV (0.644). Conclusion: Platelet indices may be used as sensitive markers in combination with traditional sepsis screening to make an early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.","PeriodicalId":16516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neonatology","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09732179241228025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is a need to increase the diagnostic capability of the traditional septic screen by adding additional markers. Platelet indices are one such marker that is readily available in routine hemogram reports. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, all newborn babies were recruited who had signs or symptoms of sepsis or had high-risk factors. Those who had clinical sepsis with positive cultures and/or a positive sepsis screen were classified under group “cases” ( n = 174), whereas all neonates suspected to have sepsis but who had a negative blood culture and a negative sepsis screen were classified under group “control” ( n = 126). Blood culture, sepsis screen, and platelet indices [platelet count, mean platelet volume (MPV), and platelet distribution width (PDW)] were performed on all babies. Babies with congenital or acquired causes of platelet abnormalities (including medication use by mothers with antiplatelet activity) were excluded from this study. Results: In this study, a total of 300 newborn babies were recruited for final analyses. Overall culture positivity was 38%. The mean platelet count was lower in the cases group ( P < 0.001). MPV and PDW were higher in septic babies with statistically significant differences ( P < 0.0001 and P = 0.012, respectively). Thrombocytopenia was the most sensitive marker (85.60%). However, it had low specificity (28.2%). On combining all three platelet markers, specificity increased to 48.4% (with a sensitivity of 64.5%) in detecting babies with neonatal sepsis. The sensitivity of the septic screen alone was 58% (with a specificity of 32.62%). When combining the sepsis screen and platelet indices, the specificity for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis increased to 62.6%. On receiver operator curve analyses, thrombocytopenia had the highest area under the curve (0.692), followed by MPV (0.644). Conclusion: Platelet indices may be used as sensitive markers in combination with traditional sepsis screening to make an early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.
评估作为新生儿败血症生物标志物的血小板指数
简介:有必要通过增加其他标记物来提高传统脓毒症筛查的诊断能力。血小板指数就是这样一种可在常规血常规报告中找到的标记物。材料和方法:在这项横断面研究中,招募了所有有败血症症状或体征或有高危因素的新生儿。临床败血症且培养阳性和/或败血症筛查阳性的新生儿被归入 "病例 "组(174 人),而所有疑似败血症但血液培养阴性和败血症筛查阴性的新生儿被归入 "对照 "组(126 人)。对所有婴儿进行血培养、败血症筛查和血小板指数[血小板计数、平均血小板体积(MPV)和血小板分布宽度(PDW)]。先天或后天原因导致血小板异常的婴儿(包括母亲服用具有抗血小板活性的药物)不在本研究范围内。研究结果本研究共招募了 300 名新生儿进行最终分析。总体培养阳性率为 38%。病例组的平均血小板计数较低(P < 0.001)。败血症婴儿的 MPV 和 PDW 较高,差异有统计学意义(分别为 P < 0.0001 和 P = 0.012)。血小板减少是最敏感的指标(85.60%)。然而,其特异性较低(28.2%)。结合所有三种血小板标记物,发现新生儿败血症婴儿的特异性增加到 48.4%(灵敏度为 64.5%)。单纯败血症筛查的灵敏度为 58%(特异性为 32.62%)。如果将败血症筛查和血小板指数结合起来,新生儿败血症诊断的特异性将提高到 62.6%。在接收器运算曲线分析中,血小板减少症的曲线下面积最大(0.692),其次是 MPV(0.644)。结论血小板指数与传统的败血症筛查相结合,可作为早期诊断新生儿败血症的敏感指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neonatology
Journal of Neonatology Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信