Can they touch? A novel mental motor imagery task for the assessment of back pain

H. Coslett, Jared Medina, Daria Kliot Goodman, Yuchao Wang, Adam Burkey
{"title":"Can they touch? A novel mental motor imagery task for the assessment of back pain","authors":"H. Coslett, Jared Medina, Daria Kliot Goodman, Yuchao Wang, Adam Burkey","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2023.1189695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As motor imagery is informed by the anticipated sensory consequences of action, including pain, we reasoned that motor imagery could provide a useful indicator of chronic back pain. We tested the hypothesis that mental motor imagery regarding body movements can provide a reliable assessment of low back pain.Eighty-five subjects with back pain and forty-five age-matched controls were shown two names of body parts and asked to indicate if they could imagine moving so that the named body parts touched. Three types of imagined movements were interrogated: movements of arms, movements of legs and movements requiring flexion and/or rotation of the low back.Accuracy and reaction times were measured. Subjects with back pain were less likely to indicate that they could touch body parts than age-matched controls. The effect was observed only for those movements that required movement of the low back or legs, suggesting that the effect was not attributable to task difficulty or non-specific effects. There was an effect of pain severity. Compared to subjects with mild pain, subjects with severe pain were significantly less likely to indicate that they could move so that named body parts touched. There was a correlation between pain ratings and impaired performance for stimuli that involved the lower but not upper body.As the Can They Touch task is quick, easy to administer and does not require an explicit judgment of pain severity, it may provide useful information to supplement the assessment of subjects with chronic pain.","PeriodicalId":12641,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pain Research","volume":"5 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1189695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As motor imagery is informed by the anticipated sensory consequences of action, including pain, we reasoned that motor imagery could provide a useful indicator of chronic back pain. We tested the hypothesis that mental motor imagery regarding body movements can provide a reliable assessment of low back pain.Eighty-five subjects with back pain and forty-five age-matched controls were shown two names of body parts and asked to indicate if they could imagine moving so that the named body parts touched. Three types of imagined movements were interrogated: movements of arms, movements of legs and movements requiring flexion and/or rotation of the low back.Accuracy and reaction times were measured. Subjects with back pain were less likely to indicate that they could touch body parts than age-matched controls. The effect was observed only for those movements that required movement of the low back or legs, suggesting that the effect was not attributable to task difficulty or non-specific effects. There was an effect of pain severity. Compared to subjects with mild pain, subjects with severe pain were significantly less likely to indicate that they could move so that named body parts touched. There was a correlation between pain ratings and impaired performance for stimuli that involved the lower but not upper body.As the Can They Touch task is quick, easy to administer and does not require an explicit judgment of pain severity, it may provide useful information to supplement the assessment of subjects with chronic pain.
他们能触摸到吗?用于评估背痛的新型心理运动想象任务
由于运动想象是根据动作的预期感官后果(包括疼痛)而产生的,因此我们推断运动想象可以为慢性背痛提供一个有用的指标。我们测试了这样一个假设,即有关身体运动的心理运动想象可以为腰痛提供可靠的评估。我们向 85 名腰痛受试者和 45 名年龄相匹配的对照组受试者展示了两个身体部位的名称,并要求受试者指出他们是否能想象出使被命名的身体部位相接触的运动。对三种类型的想象动作进行了询问:手臂动作、腿部动作以及需要腰部弯曲和/或旋转的动作。与年龄相匹配的对照组相比,患有背痛的受试者表示他们可以触摸身体部位的可能性较低。只有在需要移动腰部或腿部的动作中才能观察到这种影响,这表明这种影响不是由于任务难度或非特异性影响造成的。疼痛严重程度也有影响。与轻微疼痛的受试者相比,严重疼痛的受试者表示他们可以移动以触及指定身体部位的可能性要低得多。在涉及下半身而非上半身的刺激时,疼痛评分与表现受损之间存在相关性。由于 "能否触摸 "任务快速、易于实施,而且不需要明确判断疼痛的严重程度,因此它可以为慢性疼痛受试者的评估提供有用的补充信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信