Validation of High Speed Reactive Flow Solver in OpenFOAM with Detailed Chemistry

Vigneshwaran Sankar, K. Chatelain, J. Melguizo-Gavilanes, D. Lacoste
{"title":"Validation of High Speed Reactive Flow Solver in OpenFOAM with Detailed Chemistry","authors":"Vigneshwaran Sankar, K. Chatelain, J. Melguizo-Gavilanes, D. Lacoste","doi":"10.51560/ofj.v4.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An OpenFOAM® based hybrid-central solver called reactingPimpleCentralFoam is validated to compute hydrogen-based detonations. This solver is a pressure-based semi-implicit compressible flow solver based on central-upwind schemes of Kurganov and Tadmor. This solver possesses the features of standard OpenFOAM® solvers namely, rhoCentralFoam, reactingFoam and pimpleFoam. The solver utilizes Kurganov & Tadmor schemes for flux splitting to solve the high-speed compressible regimes with/without hydrodynamic discontinuity. In this work, we present the validation results that were obtained from one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) simulations with detailed chemistry. We consider three different mixtures that fall into the categories of weakly unstable mixture (2H2 +O2 +3.76Ar and 2H2 +O2 +10Ar), and moderately unstable mixture (2H2 +O2 +3.76N2), based on their approximate effective activation energy. We performed the numerical simulations in both laboratory frame of reference (LFR) and shock-attached frame of reference (SFR) for the 1D cases. The 1D simulation results obtained using this solver agree well with the steady-state calculations of Zel’dovich von Neumann Döring (ZND) simulations with an average error below 1% in all cases. For the 2D simulations, circular hot-spots were used to perturb the initially-planar detonations to develop into spatio-temporally unstable detonation front. The convergence is declared when the front does not deviate much from the CJ speed (Chapman-Jouguet) and the regularity of cellular pattern on the numerical smoke foils reaches a steady state. We have verified from our preliminary studies that the SFR-based simulations are computationally cheaper in comparison to the LFR simulations and that the required grid resolution is always lesser in the former than the latter to reach the same level of accuracy (in terms of speed of the detonation front and cell sizes from the numerical smoke foil). We have also verified that at least 24 points per induction zone length (for weakly unstable mixture) and 40 points per induction zone length (for moderately unstable mixture) are required to sufficiently resolve the detonation structures that are independent of grids, boundary and initial conditions. Further reduction in computational cost of approximately 50% is achieved by using non-uniform grids, which converge effectively to the same solutions in comparison to the results from twice the number of grids with uniform resolution. ","PeriodicalId":252778,"journal":{"name":"OpenFOAM® Journal","volume":"25 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OpenFOAM® Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51560/ofj.v4.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An OpenFOAM® based hybrid-central solver called reactingPimpleCentralFoam is validated to compute hydrogen-based detonations. This solver is a pressure-based semi-implicit compressible flow solver based on central-upwind schemes of Kurganov and Tadmor. This solver possesses the features of standard OpenFOAM® solvers namely, rhoCentralFoam, reactingFoam and pimpleFoam. The solver utilizes Kurganov & Tadmor schemes for flux splitting to solve the high-speed compressible regimes with/without hydrodynamic discontinuity. In this work, we present the validation results that were obtained from one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) simulations with detailed chemistry. We consider three different mixtures that fall into the categories of weakly unstable mixture (2H2 +O2 +3.76Ar and 2H2 +O2 +10Ar), and moderately unstable mixture (2H2 +O2 +3.76N2), based on their approximate effective activation energy. We performed the numerical simulations in both laboratory frame of reference (LFR) and shock-attached frame of reference (SFR) for the 1D cases. The 1D simulation results obtained using this solver agree well with the steady-state calculations of Zel’dovich von Neumann Döring (ZND) simulations with an average error below 1% in all cases. For the 2D simulations, circular hot-spots were used to perturb the initially-planar detonations to develop into spatio-temporally unstable detonation front. The convergence is declared when the front does not deviate much from the CJ speed (Chapman-Jouguet) and the regularity of cellular pattern on the numerical smoke foils reaches a steady state. We have verified from our preliminary studies that the SFR-based simulations are computationally cheaper in comparison to the LFR simulations and that the required grid resolution is always lesser in the former than the latter to reach the same level of accuracy (in terms of speed of the detonation front and cell sizes from the numerical smoke foil). We have also verified that at least 24 points per induction zone length (for weakly unstable mixture) and 40 points per induction zone length (for moderately unstable mixture) are required to sufficiently resolve the detonation structures that are independent of grids, boundary and initial conditions. Further reduction in computational cost of approximately 50% is achieved by using non-uniform grids, which converge effectively to the same solutions in comparison to the results from twice the number of grids with uniform resolution. 
验证 OpenFOAM 中的高速反应流求解器与详细化学过程
基于 OpenFOAM® 的混合-中心求解器(称为 reactingPimpleCentralFoam)已通过验证,可用于计算氢基爆轰。该求解器是基于 Kurganov 和 Tadmor 的中心上风方案的压力型半隐式可压缩流求解器。该求解器具有标准 OpenFOAM® 求解器(即 rhoCentralFoam、reactingFoam 和 pimpleFoam)的功能。该求解器利用 Kurganov & Tadmor 通量分割方案来求解有/无流体动力学不连续性的高速可压缩状态。在这项工作中,我们介绍了从一维(1D)和二维(2D)模拟中获得的验证结果。我们考虑了三种不同的混合物,根据它们的近似有效活化能,将它们分为弱不稳定混合物(2H2 +O2 +3.76Ar 和 2H2 +O2 +10Ar)和中度不稳定混合物(2H2 +O2 +3.76N2)。我们在实验室参照系(LFR)和冲击附加参照系(SFR)中对一维情况进行了数值模拟。使用该求解器得到的一维模拟结果与 Zel'dovich von Neumann Döring (ZND) 模拟的稳态计算结果非常吻合,所有情况下的平均误差都低于 1%。在二维模拟中,使用圆形热点来扰动最初为平面的爆轰,使其发展为时空不稳定的爆轰前沿。当爆炸前沿与 CJ 速度(Chapman-Jouguet)偏差不大,且数值烟箔上的蜂窝状图案达到稳定状态时,即宣告收敛。通过初步研究,我们验证了基于 SFR 的模拟与基于 LFR 的模拟相比,计算成本更低,而且前者所需的网格分辨率总是低于后者,以达到相同的精度水平(就爆炸前沿速度和数值烟箔上的单元大小而言)。我们还验证了每个感应区长度至少需要 24 个点(对于弱不稳定混合物)和每个感应区长度至少需要 40 个点(对于中度不稳定混合物)才能充分解析与网格、边界和初始条件无关的起爆结构。通过使用非均匀网格,可进一步降低约 50%的计算成本,与两倍于均匀分辨率网格的结果相比,非均匀网格可有效收敛到相同的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信