Reducing Social Stratification Bias in Referendum Participation: Evidence from the German Local Level

Jan A. Velimsky, Angelika Vetter, André Bächtiger
{"title":"Reducing Social Stratification Bias in Referendum Participation: Evidence from the German Local Level","authors":"Jan A. Velimsky, Angelika Vetter, André Bächtiger","doi":"10.1177/10659129241230901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political participation is socially distorted: Socio-economic resources affecting the probability of individuals becoming politically active question the principle of political equality. Such inequality in participation based on social stratification is well documented for elections, while research on inequality in referendum participation is still scarce. Based on the observation that such inequality varies between referendums, this paper explores referendum-specific contextual factors that may affect socially distorted referendum participation. We leverage information from an original dataset covering 1788 districts in 35 German municipalities for 68 local referendums held between 2000 and 2019. The results of our multilevel models indicate that concurrent first-order elections boost referendum turnout and decrease social stratification, while the closeness of the decision increases turnout but does not affect stratification bias. Moreover, we find a curvilinear relationship between turnout and stratification, with stratification only diminishing from participation levels above 40–50%.","PeriodicalId":508652,"journal":{"name":"Political Research Quarterly","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129241230901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Political participation is socially distorted: Socio-economic resources affecting the probability of individuals becoming politically active question the principle of political equality. Such inequality in participation based on social stratification is well documented for elections, while research on inequality in referendum participation is still scarce. Based on the observation that such inequality varies between referendums, this paper explores referendum-specific contextual factors that may affect socially distorted referendum participation. We leverage information from an original dataset covering 1788 districts in 35 German municipalities for 68 local referendums held between 2000 and 2019. The results of our multilevel models indicate that concurrent first-order elections boost referendum turnout and decrease social stratification, while the closeness of the decision increases turnout but does not affect stratification bias. Moreover, we find a curvilinear relationship between turnout and stratification, with stratification only diminishing from participation levels above 40–50%.
减少全民公决参与中的社会分层偏差:来自德国地方层面的证据
政治参与被社会扭曲:社会经济资源会影响个人积极参与政治活动的概率,这对政治平等原则提出了质疑。在选举中,这种基于社会分层的参与不平等现象已得到充分证明,但有关全民公决参与不平等现象的研究仍然很少。基于这种不平等在不同全民公决中各不相同的观察,本文探讨了可能影响社会扭曲的全民公决参与的全民公决特定背景因素。我们利用了一个原始数据集中的信息,该数据集涵盖了德国 35 个市镇的 1788 个地区,涉及 2000 年至 2019 年间举行的 68 次地方公投。我们的多层次模型结果表明,同时举行的一阶选举会提高公投投票率并减少社会分层,而决定的临近程度会提高投票率,但不会影响分层偏差。此外,我们还发现投票率与分层之间存在曲线关系,只有当参与率超过 40-50% 时,分层才会减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信