Interrogatives of reason in Tibeto-Burman languages of Sichuan

Hongdi Ding, Sicong Dong
{"title":"Interrogatives of reason in Tibeto-Burman languages of Sichuan","authors":"Hongdi Ding, Sicong Dong","doi":"10.1075/lali.00153.don","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This is a typological study of the why-interrogative expressions in Tibeto-Burman languages, or\n the non-Chinese Sino-Tibetan languages, in Sichuan, southwest China. After examining 22 languages/dialects, the interrogative\n category of reason is grouped into three types, viz. the distinct why-type, the how-type, and\n the what-type, according to the interrogative categories from which they are derived. It is discovered that the\n what-type is the dominant strategy for languages in Sichuan to derive the reason category. It is also common\n for Tibeto-Burman languages to use verbal interrogatives, namely interrogative verb phrases and interrogative words with verbal\n origins, dominantly in the sense of ‘to do what’ and ‘to become what’, to ask for reason. After a focused investigation of the\n verbal interrogatives, it is found that Tibeto-Burman languages in Sichuan distinguish purpose from cause via word/phrase\n distinction, sentential positions and semantic differences. A path of grammaticalization of the verbal interrogatives is thus\n proposed and analyzed. Finally, the derivation maps of interrogatives in Cysouw (2005)\n and Hölzl (2018) are complemented with a refined distinction between purpose and\n cause.","PeriodicalId":117772,"journal":{"name":"Language and Linguistics / 語言暨語言學","volume":"186 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Linguistics / 語言暨語言學","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00153.don","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is a typological study of the why-interrogative expressions in Tibeto-Burman languages, or the non-Chinese Sino-Tibetan languages, in Sichuan, southwest China. After examining 22 languages/dialects, the interrogative category of reason is grouped into three types, viz. the distinct why-type, the how-type, and the what-type, according to the interrogative categories from which they are derived. It is discovered that the what-type is the dominant strategy for languages in Sichuan to derive the reason category. It is also common for Tibeto-Burman languages to use verbal interrogatives, namely interrogative verb phrases and interrogative words with verbal origins, dominantly in the sense of ‘to do what’ and ‘to become what’, to ask for reason. After a focused investigation of the verbal interrogatives, it is found that Tibeto-Burman languages in Sichuan distinguish purpose from cause via word/phrase distinction, sentential positions and semantic differences. A path of grammaticalization of the verbal interrogatives is thus proposed and analyzed. Finally, the derivation maps of interrogatives in Cysouw (2005) and Hölzl (2018) are complemented with a refined distinction between purpose and cause.
四川藏缅语中的理性问句
这是对中国西南部四川地区藏缅语或非汉语汉藏语系语言中的 "为什么 "疑问句进行的类型学研究。在对 22 种语言/方言进行研究后,根据 "原因 "这一疑问词的派生类别,将其分为三种类型,即独特的 "为什么 "型、"怎么样 "型和 "是什么 "型。研究发现,"什么 "型是四川地区语言派生 "原因 "范畴的主要策略。藏缅语族语言还普遍使用动词性疑问词,即动词性疑问词短语和动词性疑问词,主要在 "做什么 "和 "变成什么 "的意义上询问理由。在对动词性疑问词进行重点调查后发现,四川藏缅语通过词/短语的区别、句位和语义的不同来区分目的和原因。由此提出并分析了动词疑问词的语法化路径。最后,对 Cysouw(2005)和 Hölzl(2018)中的疑问词派生图进行了补充,对目的和原因进行了细化区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信