Violetta Oblinger-Peters, Kristoffer Henriksen, Noora J. Ronkainen
{"title":"Meaning in elite sport – A narrative review of scholarship in sport psychology","authors":"Violetta Oblinger-Peters, Kristoffer Henriksen, Noora J. Ronkainen","doi":"10.36950/2024.2ciss002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction\nAthletes’ heart-felt stories about their experiences in elite sport almost naturally evoke the notion of meaning. However, although various scholars and practitioners have suggested the concept of meaning to the sport psychology audience in the past two decades (e.g., Beckmann, 2023; Ravizza, 2002; Ronkainen & Nesti, 2020), its study in this discipline is still in the early stages compared to established psychological scholarship on the topic. To promote meaning as a complementary lens for research and applied work in sport psychology, the presentation aims to introduce the concept informed by psychological inquiry, and to synthesize and critically comment on the extant scholarship. For this, the wider meaning in life literature will be drawn on to give an overview of components, sources, pathways, and qualities of meaning and set it apart from the related concept of purpose.\nMethods\nA narrative review of 15 studies on meaning (n = 10) and purpose (n = 5) from elite sport contexts was conducted.\nResults\nThe scholarship on meaning and purpose in elite sport revealed itself diverse in terms of employed study designs (quantitative, qualitative), methodologies and theoretical frameworks (e.g., narrative inquiry, phenomenology), conceptualizations of meaning and purpose (e.g., existential meaning, purpose in coaching), interpretations of meaning (intrapsychic or relational), and topics researched in relation to it (e.g., forced migration, injury experiences). To date the literature base on meaning and purpose in elite sport is characterized by fragmentation and largely imprecise use of the concept.\nDiscussion/Conclusion\nTo assist future empirical research and increase conceptual clarity of meaning in elite sport, sport psychology should integrate knowledge from its parent discipline psychology. Additionally, to make the somewhat abstract notion of meaning tangible for sport practitioners, more applied questions must be addressed. Through this, meaning could offer a truly holistic approach to well-being and mental health research and practice in sport. Importantly, “working” with meaning requires personal positioning, since conceiving of meaning as performance enhancement tool or as existential concern has major implications for how it is investigated and for how or whether it should be increased.\nReferences\nBeckmann, J. (2023). Meaning and meaninglessness in elite sport. In I. Nixdorf, R. Nixdorf, J. Beckmann, S. Martin, & T. Macintyre (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Mental Health in Elite Sport (pp. 31–44). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099345-5\nRavizza, K. (2002). A philosophical construct: A framework for performance enhancement. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 33, 4–18. \nRonkainen, N. J. & Nesti, M. S. (2019). Meaning and Spirituality in Sport and Exercise: Psychological Perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315102412","PeriodicalId":415194,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36950/2024.2ciss002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Athletes’ heart-felt stories about their experiences in elite sport almost naturally evoke the notion of meaning. However, although various scholars and practitioners have suggested the concept of meaning to the sport psychology audience in the past two decades (e.g., Beckmann, 2023; Ravizza, 2002; Ronkainen & Nesti, 2020), its study in this discipline is still in the early stages compared to established psychological scholarship on the topic. To promote meaning as a complementary lens for research and applied work in sport psychology, the presentation aims to introduce the concept informed by psychological inquiry, and to synthesize and critically comment on the extant scholarship. For this, the wider meaning in life literature will be drawn on to give an overview of components, sources, pathways, and qualities of meaning and set it apart from the related concept of purpose.
Methods
A narrative review of 15 studies on meaning (n = 10) and purpose (n = 5) from elite sport contexts was conducted.
Results
The scholarship on meaning and purpose in elite sport revealed itself diverse in terms of employed study designs (quantitative, qualitative), methodologies and theoretical frameworks (e.g., narrative inquiry, phenomenology), conceptualizations of meaning and purpose (e.g., existential meaning, purpose in coaching), interpretations of meaning (intrapsychic or relational), and topics researched in relation to it (e.g., forced migration, injury experiences). To date the literature base on meaning and purpose in elite sport is characterized by fragmentation and largely imprecise use of the concept.
Discussion/Conclusion
To assist future empirical research and increase conceptual clarity of meaning in elite sport, sport psychology should integrate knowledge from its parent discipline psychology. Additionally, to make the somewhat abstract notion of meaning tangible for sport practitioners, more applied questions must be addressed. Through this, meaning could offer a truly holistic approach to well-being and mental health research and practice in sport. Importantly, “working” with meaning requires personal positioning, since conceiving of meaning as performance enhancement tool or as existential concern has major implications for how it is investigated and for how or whether it should be increased.
References
Beckmann, J. (2023). Meaning and meaninglessness in elite sport. In I. Nixdorf, R. Nixdorf, J. Beckmann, S. Martin, & T. Macintyre (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Mental Health in Elite Sport (pp. 31–44). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099345-5
Ravizza, K. (2002). A philosophical construct: A framework for performance enhancement. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 33, 4–18.
Ronkainen, N. J. & Nesti, M. S. (2019). Meaning and Spirituality in Sport and Exercise: Psychological Perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315102412
导言:运动员讲述他们在精英体育运动中的经历,这些发自内心的故事几乎自然而然地唤起了 "意义 "的概念。然而,尽管在过去的二十年中,已有多位学者和实践者向运动心理学受众提出了 "意义 "这一概念(例如,Beckmann, 2023; Ravizza, 2002; Ronkainen & Nesti, 2020),但与有关该主题的成熟心理学学术研究相比,该学科对 "意义 "的研究仍处于早期阶段。为了将 "意义 "作为运动心理学研究和应用工作的补充视角加以推广,本报告旨在通过心理学研究介绍这一概念,并对现有的学术研究进行综合和批判性评论。为此,我们将借鉴更广泛的生命意义文献,对意义的组成、来源、途径和品质进行概述,并将其与相关的目的概念区分开来。方法我们对精英体育背景下的 15 项关于意义(10 项)和目的(5 项)的研究进行了叙事回顾、在采用的研究设计(定量、定性)、方法和理论框架(如叙事调查、现象学)、意义和目的的概念化(如存在的意义、教练的目的)、对意义的解释(心理内部或关系)以及与之相关的研究主题(如被迫迁移、受伤经历)方面,揭示了其多样性。迄今为止,有关精英体育运动的意义和目的的文献基础的特点是支离破碎,对这一概念的使用在很大程度上并不精确。讨论/结论为了帮助未来的实证研究并提高精英体育运动意义概念的清晰度,运动心理学应整合其母体学科心理学的知识。此外,为了使体育从业人员能够理解意义这一略显抽象的概念,必须解决更多的应用问题。这样,"意义 "就能为体育运动中的幸福感和心理健康研究与实践提供一种真正全面的方法。重要的是,意义 "工作 "需要个人定位,因为将意义视为提高成绩的工具或存在的关切,对如何研究意义以及如何或是否应增加意义具有重大影响。精英体育中的意义与无意义。In I. Nixdorf, R. Nixdorf, J. Beckmann, S. Martin, & T. Macintyre (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Mental Health in Elite Sport (pp. 31-44).https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099345-5Ravizza, K. (2002).A philosophical construct:A philosophical construct: A framework for performance enhancement.International Journal of Sport Psychology, 33, 4-18.Ronkainen, N. J. & Nesti, M. S. (2019).体育锻炼中的意义与灵性:Psychological Perspectives.Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315102412