Concurrence of Intracranial Injuries with Facial Trauma: A Retrospective Nationwide Analysis

Erin J. Kim, Theodore C. Lee, Valeria P. Bustos, Helen Xun, Bernard T. Lee
{"title":"Concurrence of Intracranial Injuries with Facial Trauma: A Retrospective Nationwide Analysis","authors":"Erin J. Kim, Theodore C. Lee, Valeria P. Bustos, Helen Xun, Bernard T. Lee","doi":"10.1177/22925503231217514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The current literature exploring the association between facial and intracranial injuries is limited, as it primarily focuses on the association with facial fractures. This study aims to broaden the epidemiologic association between facial and intracranial trauma by expanding the scope of studied facial injuries. The secondary aim of this study will be to identify the most common setting of injury, diagnosis, and mechanism of injury. Methods: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database, which captures consumer goods-related injuries, was queried from 2019 to 2021. Inclusion criteria included encounters with cranial, facial, and both cranial and facial injuries. Outcome variables included the number of encounters, diagnosis, location of injury, associated consumer products, and patient disposition. Predictor variables included patient demographic information. Descriptive analyses were conducted, and all analyses were done on weighted national estimates. Results: A total of 10 939 340 weighted encounters were analyzed. Facial injuries had concurrent cranial injuries in approximately 1 in 4 encounters, and cranial injuries had concurrent facial injuries in approximately 1 in 6 encounters. Intracranial head injuries occurred with lower acuity facial injuries and without facial fractures in 91.1% of the encounters. The most common location across all groups was at home (66.9%), and building structures (28.8%) were the most common products resulting in injury. Conclusion: There is an understudied burden of associated intracranial injuries with lower acuity facial trauma across all ages, specifically in the home setting. Thus, in evaluating facial trauma, providers should consistently assess for potential head trauma, even when not immediately evident.","PeriodicalId":509434,"journal":{"name":"Plastic Surgery","volume":"241 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22925503231217514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The current literature exploring the association between facial and intracranial injuries is limited, as it primarily focuses on the association with facial fractures. This study aims to broaden the epidemiologic association between facial and intracranial trauma by expanding the scope of studied facial injuries. The secondary aim of this study will be to identify the most common setting of injury, diagnosis, and mechanism of injury. Methods: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database, which captures consumer goods-related injuries, was queried from 2019 to 2021. Inclusion criteria included encounters with cranial, facial, and both cranial and facial injuries. Outcome variables included the number of encounters, diagnosis, location of injury, associated consumer products, and patient disposition. Predictor variables included patient demographic information. Descriptive analyses were conducted, and all analyses were done on weighted national estimates. Results: A total of 10 939 340 weighted encounters were analyzed. Facial injuries had concurrent cranial injuries in approximately 1 in 4 encounters, and cranial injuries had concurrent facial injuries in approximately 1 in 6 encounters. Intracranial head injuries occurred with lower acuity facial injuries and without facial fractures in 91.1% of the encounters. The most common location across all groups was at home (66.9%), and building structures (28.8%) were the most common products resulting in injury. Conclusion: There is an understudied burden of associated intracranial injuries with lower acuity facial trauma across all ages, specifically in the home setting. Thus, in evaluating facial trauma, providers should consistently assess for potential head trauma, even when not immediately evident.
颅内损伤与面部创伤的并发症:全国范围内的回顾性分析
简介目前探讨面部创伤与颅内损伤关系的文献有限,主要集中于面部骨折的相关性。本研究旨在通过扩大面部损伤的研究范围,拓宽面部与颅内创伤之间的流行病学关联。本研究的第二个目的是确定最常见的受伤情况、诊断和受伤机制。研究方法从 2019 年到 2021 年,我们查询了国家电子伤害监测系统数据库,该数据库记录了与消费品相关的伤害。纳入标准包括颅脑损伤、面部损伤以及颅脑损伤和面部损伤。结果变量包括就诊次数、诊断、受伤部位、相关消费品和患者处置。预测变量包括患者人口统计学信息。我们进行了描述性分析,所有分析都是根据全国加权估计值进行的。结果:共分析了 10 939 340 次加权就诊。约四分之一的患者面部受伤的同时伴有颅骨损伤,约六分之一的患者颅骨受伤的同时伴有面部损伤。在 91.1% 的就诊案例中,颅内损伤与较低敏锐度的面部损伤同时发生,且无面部骨折。所有组别中最常见的受伤地点是在家中(66.9%),建筑结构(28.8%)是最常见的致伤产品。结论:各年龄段的低敏锐度面部外伤,特别是在家庭环境中造成的颅内损伤的相关负担还未得到充分研究。因此,在评估面部创伤时,医疗服务提供者应始终如一地评估潜在的头部创伤,即使并不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书