LEGAL PROTECTION FOR PERPETRATORS OF MINOR ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMES

Priska Deianeira Kulape, Amalia Syauket, Rama Dhianty
{"title":"LEGAL PROTECTION FOR PERPETRATORS OF MINOR ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMES","authors":"Priska Deianeira Kulape, Amalia Syauket, Rama Dhianty","doi":"10.55324/josr.v3i1.1932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supreme Court Regulation Number 02 of 2012 concerning Adjustment of the Limits of Light Criminal Acts and the Amount of Fines was created with the intention of facilitating law enforcement, especially judges, to administer justice in the cases they adjudicate. However, in practice, restorative justice with ADR methods has not been optimally applied to light criminal acts. One of the areas with the most disparities is the issue of light criminal acts in the field of the environment. Therefore, this research aims to determine what constitutes light criminal acts in the field of the environment and to understand the legal protection for perpetrators of light criminal acts in the field of the environment. The research method used is a normative juridical method using secondary legal sources. The results of the study indicate the scope of light criminal acts in the field of the environment. Criminal acts regulated in Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management are specified in Articles 41 to 44 of Law Number 32 of 2009. If there is minor theft for environmental results, the Criminal Code must also be considered as the legal framework specifically regulating theft (lex specialis derogat legi generali). Legal protection for perpetrators of light criminal acts in the field of the environment must align with the goals of criminalization, with sociological, ideological, and juridical-philosophical approaches, based on the fundamental assumption that criminal acts disrupt the balance, harmony, and coherence in community life","PeriodicalId":507389,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Research","volume":"314 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v3i1.1932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supreme Court Regulation Number 02 of 2012 concerning Adjustment of the Limits of Light Criminal Acts and the Amount of Fines was created with the intention of facilitating law enforcement, especially judges, to administer justice in the cases they adjudicate. However, in practice, restorative justice with ADR methods has not been optimally applied to light criminal acts. One of the areas with the most disparities is the issue of light criminal acts in the field of the environment. Therefore, this research aims to determine what constitutes light criminal acts in the field of the environment and to understand the legal protection for perpetrators of light criminal acts in the field of the environment. The research method used is a normative juridical method using secondary legal sources. The results of the study indicate the scope of light criminal acts in the field of the environment. Criminal acts regulated in Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management are specified in Articles 41 to 44 of Law Number 32 of 2009. If there is minor theft for environmental results, the Criminal Code must also be considered as the legal framework specifically regulating theft (lex specialis derogat legi generali). Legal protection for perpetrators of light criminal acts in the field of the environment must align with the goals of criminalization, with sociological, ideological, and juridical-philosophical approaches, based on the fundamental assumption that criminal acts disrupt the balance, harmony, and coherence in community life
为轻微环境犯罪行为人提供法律保护
最高法院 2012 年第 02 号《关于调整轻微犯罪行为限度和罚款金额的条例》的制定旨在促进执法,特别是法官在其审理的案件中伸张正义。然而,在实践中,采用替代性争议解决方法的恢复性司法并未以最佳方式适用于轻微犯罪行为。差距最大的领域之一就是环境领域的轻微犯罪行为问题。因此,本研究旨在确定什么是环境领域的轻微犯罪行为,并了解对环境领域轻微犯罪行为人的法律保护。采用的研究方法是使用二手法律资料的规范法学方法。研究结果表明了环境领域轻微犯罪行为的范围。2009 年第 32 号法律《环境保护与管理法》第 41 至 44 条规定了该法所规范的犯罪行为。如果存在为取得环境成果而实施的轻微盗窃行为,还必须将《刑法典》视为专门规范盗窃行为的法律框架(lex specialis derogat legi generali)。对环境领域轻微犯罪行为人的法律保护必须与刑事定罪的目标、社会学、意识形态和法学 哲学方法相一致,其基本假设是犯罪行为破坏了社区生活的平衡、和谐与一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信