Computational thinking on concept pattern number: A study learning style Kolb

R. Purwasih, T. Turmudi, J. Dahlan, Naufal Ishartono
{"title":"Computational thinking on concept pattern number: A study learning style Kolb","authors":"R. Purwasih, T. Turmudi, J. Dahlan, Naufal Ishartono","doi":"10.29408/jel.v10i1.23056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to determine how the number pattern concept's computational thinking characteristic picture was reviewed from the Kolb model's learning style. The research method used in this study is qualitative descriptive. The research was conducted at one of the state's small schools in Bandung. The research subjects consisted of 29 students in the ninth grade. One of the 29 study issues is selected with assimilator learning styles. The data-gathering techniques used are questionnaire tests, test instruments, and interviews. Angket is used to group subjects into four groups of learning style types. The test instrument was used to describe the computational thinking characteristics of high school students on the concept of number patterns, and the interview was used to strengthen the test summary results of the subject. The results of this study show that the characteristics of computational thinking that each type of learning style dominates are different. Computational thinking students with an assimilator learning style in solving mathematical problems of number patterns can solve issues by involving decomposition, pattern identification, abstraction and generalization, and algorithms. They can generalize patterns using accurate, thorough, complete, and systematic problem-solving strategies.","PeriodicalId":109114,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Elemen","volume":" 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Elemen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v10i1.23056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aimed to determine how the number pattern concept's computational thinking characteristic picture was reviewed from the Kolb model's learning style. The research method used in this study is qualitative descriptive. The research was conducted at one of the state's small schools in Bandung. The research subjects consisted of 29 students in the ninth grade. One of the 29 study issues is selected with assimilator learning styles. The data-gathering techniques used are questionnaire tests, test instruments, and interviews. Angket is used to group subjects into four groups of learning style types. The test instrument was used to describe the computational thinking characteristics of high school students on the concept of number patterns, and the interview was used to strengthen the test summary results of the subject. The results of this study show that the characteristics of computational thinking that each type of learning style dominates are different. Computational thinking students with an assimilator learning style in solving mathematical problems of number patterns can solve issues by involving decomposition, pattern identification, abstraction and generalization, and algorithms. They can generalize patterns using accurate, thorough, complete, and systematic problem-solving strategies.
概念模式数的计算思维:科尔布学习风格研究
本研究旨在确定如何从柯布模型的学习风格中审视数字模式概念的计算思维特征图。本研究采用的研究方法是定性描述法。研究在万隆州的一所小型学校进行。研究对象包括 29 名九年级学生。在 29 个研究对象中,选择了一个具有同化学习风格的学生作为研究对象。使用的数据收集技术包括问卷测试、测试工具和访谈。Angket 用于将研究对象分为四组学习风格类型。测试工具用于描述高中生在数字模式概念上的计算思维特征,访谈用于强化受试者的测试总结结果。研究结果表明,每种学习风格类型所主导的计算思维特点是不同的。在解决数模数学问题时,具有同化者学习风格的计算思维学生可以通过分解、模式识别、抽象和概括以及算法来解决问题。他们能运用准确、全面、完整和系统的解题策略来概括模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信