Measuring organizational transparency with 10 items: Validation of a German short scale

C. R. Hossiep, Julian Märtins, Gerhard Schewe
{"title":"Measuring organizational transparency with 10 items: Validation of a German short scale","authors":"C. R. Hossiep, Julian Märtins, Gerhard Schewe","doi":"10.5964/miss.11209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent research on transparency in organizational settings, a multidimensional understanding of supervisor transparency has gained acceptance. Following recent operationalizations, the construct can be measured by the five dimensions of Disclosure, Clarity, Accuracy, Timeliness, and Relevance of shared information. Initial applications of the scale already show its usefulness in that theoretically well-founded relationships, e.g., to trust, could be empirically supported using the instrument. As the instrument consists of twenty items, it can be too long for specific application fields. A shorter, more economical instrument is of value, especially in surveys that include many different constructs. In this article, we report on our testing of the suitability of a German shorter version consisting of only ten items. The results show that this instrument respects the dimensionality of the construct and leads to similar effects concerning its relationship to trust (-worthiness) and job satisfaction compared to the long scale. The findings also support the notion that individual transparency dimensions have different and distinct effects. Thus, the importance of a multidimensional understanding of transparency in organizational settings is also underlined by the short scale.","PeriodicalId":382709,"journal":{"name":"Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences","volume":" 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5964/miss.11209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent research on transparency in organizational settings, a multidimensional understanding of supervisor transparency has gained acceptance. Following recent operationalizations, the construct can be measured by the five dimensions of Disclosure, Clarity, Accuracy, Timeliness, and Relevance of shared information. Initial applications of the scale already show its usefulness in that theoretically well-founded relationships, e.g., to trust, could be empirically supported using the instrument. As the instrument consists of twenty items, it can be too long for specific application fields. A shorter, more economical instrument is of value, especially in surveys that include many different constructs. In this article, we report on our testing of the suitability of a German shorter version consisting of only ten items. The results show that this instrument respects the dimensionality of the construct and leads to similar effects concerning its relationship to trust (-worthiness) and job satisfaction compared to the long scale. The findings also support the notion that individual transparency dimensions have different and distinct effects. Thus, the importance of a multidimensional understanding of transparency in organizational settings is also underlined by the short scale.
用 10 个项目衡量组织透明度:德国短量表的验证
在最近关于组织环境透明度的研究中,对主管透明度的多维理解已得到认可。根据最新的操作方法,这一概念可以通过共享信息的披露、清晰、准确、及时和相关性这五个维度来衡量。该量表的初步应用已经显示出它的实用性,因为理论上有充分依据的关系,如信任关系,可以通过该工具得到实证支持。由于该量表由二十个项目组成,对于特定的应用领域来说可能太长。一个更简短、更经济的工具是有价值的,尤其是在包含许多不同构念的调查中。在这篇文章中,我们报告了对只有十个项目的德文简短版本的适用性测试。结果表明,与长量表相比,该工具尊重了构念的维度性,并在信任(值得信赖)和工作满意度的关系方面产生了相似的效果。研究结果还支持这样一种观点,即各个透明度维度具有不同和独特的效果。因此,短量表也强调了多维度理解组织环境中透明度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信