Evaluation of a novel cuffless photoplethysmography-based wristband for measuring blood pressure according to the regulatory standards

M. van Vliet, S. Monnink, M. Kuiper, J. Constandse, D. Hoftijzer, E. Ronner
{"title":"Evaluation of a novel cuffless photoplethysmography-based wristband for measuring blood pressure according to the regulatory standards","authors":"M. van Vliet, S. Monnink, M. Kuiper, J. Constandse, D. Hoftijzer, E. Ronner","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztae006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Elevated blood pressure is a key risk factor in cardiovascular diseases. However, obtaining reliable and reproducible blood pressure remains a challenge. This study, therefore, aimed to evaluate a novel cuffless wristband, based on photoplethysmography, for continuous blood pressure monitoring.\n \n \n \n Predictions by a photoplethysmography-guided algorithm were compared to arterial blood pressure measurements (in the subclavian artery), obtained during cardiac catheterisation. Eligible patients were included and screened based on AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard requirements. The machine learning-based blood pressure algorithm required three cuff-based initialisation measurements in combination with approximately 100 features (signal-derived and patient demographic-based).\n \n \n \n 97 patients and 420 samples were included. Mean age, weight, and height were 67.1 years (SD 11.1), 83.4 kg (SD 16.1), and 174 cm (SD 10), respectively. Systolic blood pressure was ≤100 mmHg in 48 samples (11%) and ≥160 mmHg in 106 samples (25%). Diastolic blood pressure was ≤70 mmHg in 222 samples (53%) and ≥85 mmHg in 99 samples (24%). The algorithm showed mean errors of ±3.7 mmHg (SD 4.4 mmHg) and ±2.5 mmHg (SD 3.7 mmHg) for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively. Similar results were observed across all genders and skin colours (Fitzpatrick I-VI).\n \n \n \n This study provides initial evidence for the accuracy of a photoplethysmography-based blood pressure algorithm in combination with a cuffless wristband across a range of blood pressure distributions. This research complies with the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard, however, further research is required to evaluate the algorithms performance in light of the remaining European Society of Hypertension recommendations.\n Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05566886.\n","PeriodicalId":508387,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Digital Health","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztae006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elevated blood pressure is a key risk factor in cardiovascular diseases. However, obtaining reliable and reproducible blood pressure remains a challenge. This study, therefore, aimed to evaluate a novel cuffless wristband, based on photoplethysmography, for continuous blood pressure monitoring. Predictions by a photoplethysmography-guided algorithm were compared to arterial blood pressure measurements (in the subclavian artery), obtained during cardiac catheterisation. Eligible patients were included and screened based on AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard requirements. The machine learning-based blood pressure algorithm required three cuff-based initialisation measurements in combination with approximately 100 features (signal-derived and patient demographic-based). 97 patients and 420 samples were included. Mean age, weight, and height were 67.1 years (SD 11.1), 83.4 kg (SD 16.1), and 174 cm (SD 10), respectively. Systolic blood pressure was ≤100 mmHg in 48 samples (11%) and ≥160 mmHg in 106 samples (25%). Diastolic blood pressure was ≤70 mmHg in 222 samples (53%) and ≥85 mmHg in 99 samples (24%). The algorithm showed mean errors of ±3.7 mmHg (SD 4.4 mmHg) and ±2.5 mmHg (SD 3.7 mmHg) for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively. Similar results were observed across all genders and skin colours (Fitzpatrick I-VI). This study provides initial evidence for the accuracy of a photoplethysmography-based blood pressure algorithm in combination with a cuffless wristband across a range of blood pressure distributions. This research complies with the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard, however, further research is required to evaluate the algorithms performance in light of the remaining European Society of Hypertension recommendations. Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05566886.
根据法规标准评估新型无袖带光敏血压计腕带的血压测量效果
血压升高是心血管疾病的一个关键风险因素。然而,获取可靠、可重复的血压仍然是一项挑战。因此,本研究旨在评估一种基于光电血压计的新型无袖带连续血压监测仪。 研究人员将光敏血压计指导算法的预测结果与心导管手术中获得的动脉血压测量值(锁骨下动脉)进行了比较。根据 AAMI/ESH/ISO 通用标准的要求,对符合条件的患者进行了纳入和筛选。基于机器学习的血压算法需要进行三次袖带初始化测量,并结合约 100 个特征(信号衍生特征和患者人口特征)。 共纳入 97 名患者和 420 个样本。平均年龄、体重和身高分别为 67.1 岁(标清 11.1)、83.4 公斤(标清 16.1)和 174 厘米(标清 10)。48个样本(11%)的收缩压≤100 mmHg,106个样本(25%)的收缩压≥160 mmHg。222个样本(53%)的舒张压≤70 mmHg,99个样本(24%)的舒张压≥85 mmHg。该算法显示收缩压和舒张压的平均误差分别为±3.7毫米汞柱(标准差为4.4毫米汞柱)和±2.5毫米汞柱(标准差为3.7毫米汞柱)。在所有性别和肤色(菲茨帕特里克 I-VI)中都观察到了类似的结果。 这项研究提供了初步证据,证明基于照相血压计的血压算法与无袖带腕带相结合,在各种血压分布情况下都能准确测量血压。这项研究符合 AAMI/ESH/ISO 通用标准,但还需要进一步研究,以根据欧洲高血压学会的其他建议评估该算法的性能。试验注册:www.clinicaltrials.gov,NCT05566886。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信