In‐office serial intralesional steroid injection for subglottic stenosis: Case series of 14 patients with multiple etiologies

Nader Wehbi, Claire Gleadhill, David Ahmadian, Jonathan R. Skirko, Helena T. Yip
{"title":"In‐office serial intralesional steroid injection for subglottic stenosis: Case series of 14 patients with multiple etiologies","authors":"Nader Wehbi, Claire Gleadhill, David Ahmadian, Jonathan R. Skirko, Helena T. Yip","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subglottic stenosis (SGS) is commonly treated with endoscopic dilations or tracheal resection. Since office‐based serial intralesional steroid injections (SILSI) were first reported in 2017, they have been established as an effective, less invasive treatment alternative or adjunct. The aim of this study is to add to the literature investigating the efficacy of office‐based SILSIs for idiopathic and post‐intubation SGS patients, specifically studying surgery‐free intervals (SFIs) and discussing our experience with SILSI treatment order and stenosis grade.This study is a retrospective case series of 14 patients with subglottic stenosis treated with in‐office serial intralesional steroid injections as a primary or adjuvant treatment from 2018 to 2022 in an academic tertiary care center.Of seven patients with calculable SFI, a mean SFI increase of 481.28 days was observed following SILSI treatment (p = 0.042). Ten patients in our cohort presented with idiopathic or post‐intubation grade 2 SGS and were managed successfully with a combination of endoscopic dilation and SILSI. Two patients with post‐intubation grade 1 SGS were managed successfully with SILSI as their primary treatment. Two patients with post‐intubation grade 3 SGS required a tracheal resection and did not benefit from SILSI.We have found that SFI significantly increased following SILSI initiation. Although statistical power was limited given the small sample size, our findings suggest that SILSI may be an effective primary treatment in low‐grade stenosis. SILSI as an adjuvant to endoscopic dilation may be most effective in intermediate‐grade stenosis. SILSI may not be effective in high‐grade stenosis patients who failed prior endoscopic treatment.","PeriodicalId":510563,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","volume":" 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subglottic stenosis (SGS) is commonly treated with endoscopic dilations or tracheal resection. Since office‐based serial intralesional steroid injections (SILSI) were first reported in 2017, they have been established as an effective, less invasive treatment alternative or adjunct. The aim of this study is to add to the literature investigating the efficacy of office‐based SILSIs for idiopathic and post‐intubation SGS patients, specifically studying surgery‐free intervals (SFIs) and discussing our experience with SILSI treatment order and stenosis grade.This study is a retrospective case series of 14 patients with subglottic stenosis treated with in‐office serial intralesional steroid injections as a primary or adjuvant treatment from 2018 to 2022 in an academic tertiary care center.Of seven patients with calculable SFI, a mean SFI increase of 481.28 days was observed following SILSI treatment (p = 0.042). Ten patients in our cohort presented with idiopathic or post‐intubation grade 2 SGS and were managed successfully with a combination of endoscopic dilation and SILSI. Two patients with post‐intubation grade 1 SGS were managed successfully with SILSI as their primary treatment. Two patients with post‐intubation grade 3 SGS required a tracheal resection and did not benefit from SILSI.We have found that SFI significantly increased following SILSI initiation. Although statistical power was limited given the small sample size, our findings suggest that SILSI may be an effective primary treatment in low‐grade stenosis. SILSI as an adjuvant to endoscopic dilation may be most effective in intermediate‐grade stenosis. SILSI may not be effective in high‐grade stenosis patients who failed prior endoscopic treatment.
诊室内连续注射类固醇治疗声门下狭窄:14 位多种病因患者的病例系列
声门下狭窄(SGS)通常采用内窥镜扩张术或气管切除术进行治疗。自 2017 年首次报道基于诊室的连续腔内类固醇注射(SILSI)以来,它已被确定为一种有效的、创伤较小的治疗替代方法或辅助方法。本研究旨在补充研究基于诊室的 SILSI 对特发性和插管后 SGS 患者疗效的文献,特别是研究无手术间隔期(SFIs),并讨论我们在 SILSI 治疗顺序和狭窄等级方面的经验。本研究是一项回顾性病例系列研究,研究对象是2018年至2022年在一家学术性三级医疗中心接受诊室内连续注射类固醇作为主要或辅助治疗的14例声门下狭窄患者。在7例可计算SFI的患者中,观察到SILSI治疗后平均SFI增加了481.28天(P = 0.042)。在我们的队列中,有 10 名患者属于特发性或插管后 2 级 SGS,他们在接受内窥镜扩张术和 SILSI 联合治疗后获得了成功。两名插管后 1 级 SGS 患者采用 SILSI 作为主要治疗方法,并获得成功。两名插管后 3 级 SGS 患者需要进行气管切除术,但并未从 SILSI 中获益。虽然由于样本量较小,统计能力有限,但我们的研究结果表明,SILSI 可能是治疗低级别气管狭窄的有效方法。SILSI 作为内窥镜扩张术的辅助手段,可能对中级狭窄最有效。SILSI 可能对之前内窥镜治疗失败的高级别狭窄患者无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信