Forensic accounting, socio-economic factors and value added tax evasion in emerging economies: evidence from Jordan

IF 3.3 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
A. Alshira’h, M. Alshirah, A. A. L. Khassawneh
{"title":"Forensic accounting, socio-economic factors and value added tax evasion in emerging economies: evidence from Jordan","authors":"A. Alshira’h, M. Alshirah, A. A. L. Khassawneh","doi":"10.1108/jfra-04-2023-0202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to determine the impact of forensic accounting, probability of detections, tax penalties, government spending, tax justice and tax ethics on value-added tax (VAT) evasion.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study uses partial least squares-structural equation modeling to examine the connection between tax sanction, probability of detection, tax ethics, tax justice, forensic accounting and government spending on VAT evasion based on 248 responses collected from the retail industry in Jordan.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings also demonstrate that there is a negative correlation between tax sanctions, probability of detection, tax ethics, tax justice, forensic accounting, government spending and VAT evasion efficiency.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe results, considering forensic accounting and government expenditure considerations, may emphasize the importance of the tax sanction, probability of detection, tax ethics, adoption of tax justice in the public sector and tax authority. Additionally, the findings are important for regulators and decision-makers in announcing new laws and strategies for VAT evasion.\n\n\nSocial implications\nIt turns out that the tax authority and public sector can definitely improve their capacity to protect public funds and limit VAT evasion practices within SMEs by adopting increased tax sanctions, probability of detection, tax ethics, tax justice, forensic accounting and government spending.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nNumerous studies have been conducted at the individual level in the context of income tax on the link between tax punishment, probability of detection, tax ethics, tax justice, forensic accounting and tax evasion. This study expands on the scant evidence of this connection to the retail business in the context of VAT avoidance. Additionally, it advances prior studies by integrating fresh elements, such as forensic accounting and government expenditure, that have never been considered in connection to VAT evasion in the retail sector.\n","PeriodicalId":15826,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-04-2023-0202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to determine the impact of forensic accounting, probability of detections, tax penalties, government spending, tax justice and tax ethics on value-added tax (VAT) evasion. Design/methodology/approach The study uses partial least squares-structural equation modeling to examine the connection between tax sanction, probability of detection, tax ethics, tax justice, forensic accounting and government spending on VAT evasion based on 248 responses collected from the retail industry in Jordan. Findings The findings also demonstrate that there is a negative correlation between tax sanctions, probability of detection, tax ethics, tax justice, forensic accounting, government spending and VAT evasion efficiency. Practical implications The results, considering forensic accounting and government expenditure considerations, may emphasize the importance of the tax sanction, probability of detection, tax ethics, adoption of tax justice in the public sector and tax authority. Additionally, the findings are important for regulators and decision-makers in announcing new laws and strategies for VAT evasion. Social implications It turns out that the tax authority and public sector can definitely improve their capacity to protect public funds and limit VAT evasion practices within SMEs by adopting increased tax sanctions, probability of detection, tax ethics, tax justice, forensic accounting and government spending. Originality/value Numerous studies have been conducted at the individual level in the context of income tax on the link between tax punishment, probability of detection, tax ethics, tax justice, forensic accounting and tax evasion. This study expands on the scant evidence of this connection to the retail business in the context of VAT avoidance. Additionally, it advances prior studies by integrating fresh elements, such as forensic accounting and government expenditure, that have never been considered in connection to VAT evasion in the retail sector.
新兴经济体的法务会计、社会经济因素和增值税逃税:来自约旦的证据
目的本研究旨在确定法务会计、侦查概率、税收处罚、政府支出、税收正义和税收道德对增值税(VAT)逃税的影响。设计/方法/方法本研究使用偏最小二乘法结构方程模型,根据从约旦零售业收集的 248 份答复,研究税收处罚、侦查概率、税收道德、税收正义、法务会计和政府支出对增值税逃税的影响。研究结果研究结果还表明,税收制裁、发现概率、税收道德、税收正义、法务会计、政府支出和增值税逃税效率之间存在负相关关系。此外,这些研究结果对于监管机构和决策者宣布针对增值税逃税的新法律和战略也很重要。社会影响事实证明,税务机关和公共部门通过加强税收制裁、检测概率、税收道德、税收正义、法务会计和政府支出,一定可以提高其保护公共资金和限制中小企业增值税逃税行为的能力。原创性/价值在个人所得税的背景下,对税务处罚、被发现概率、税务道德、税务正义、法务会计和逃税之间的联系进行了大量研究。本研究以增值税避税为背景,扩展了零售业务中这种联系的稀缺证据。此外,本研究还通过整合法务会计和政府支出等从未考虑过的与零售业增值税逃税相关的新要素,推进了之前的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
16.00%
发文量
65
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信