Stacking nitrogen mitigation strategies for future pasture-based dairy farms: impacts on leaching and profit

Pierre Beukes, Craig Depree, Katrina A. Macintosh, David Silva-Villacorta
{"title":"Stacking nitrogen mitigation strategies for future pasture-based dairy farms: impacts on leaching and profit","authors":"Pierre Beukes, Craig Depree, Katrina A. Macintosh, David Silva-Villacorta","doi":"10.3389/fanim.2024.1277131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Producers in New Zealand’s pasture-based, seasonal dairy sector are striving to reduce nitrogen (N) losses to the environment whilst maintaining or increasing farm profitability. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of stacking different combinations of five N leaching mitigation strategies within the whole farm system; 1) reduced N fertilizer input, 2) off-paddock infrastructure, 3) recycling N by growing maize silage on a dedicated area on the farm using effluent as a fertilizer source followed by a catch-crop, 4) dietary salt supplementation to dilute urinary N, and 5) applying a nitrification inhibitor (NI) to slow the release of nitrate in the soil. The reference point (baseline) was a typical current dairy farm (CF) system in the Waikato region of New Zealand. We modelled four Future Farm scenarios by stacking mitigation strategies as follows: baseline plus reduced N fertilizer input, reduced stocking rate, and off-paddock infrastructure (FF); FF plus a dedicated maize block (FFP); FFP plus dietary salt (FFPS); and FFPS plus NI (FFPSNI). These systems were modelled using the Whole Farm Model coupled with the Urine Patch Framework, and APSIM models, using observed climate and economic input data over five consecutive years from 2013-2018. Relative to CF, the FF system achieved a N leaching reduction of 31% with a reduction in profit of 16%. The FFP system had a smaller N leaching reduction (22%), but the reduction in profit was smaller (11%). The fully stacked system (FFPSNI) demonstrated the largest leaching reduction of 33%, but also the largest profit reduction of 27%, compared with the CF. Stacking these five N mitigation strategies can achieve substantial N leaching reductions at the farm-scale. Including a dedicated, effluent-fertilized maize block followed by a catch-crop as part of the stack can reduce the negative impact on profitability but has a trade-off in N leaching. Farmers will have to weigh up these compromises between profit and leaching, considering risk factors not modelled here.","PeriodicalId":503755,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2024.1277131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Producers in New Zealand’s pasture-based, seasonal dairy sector are striving to reduce nitrogen (N) losses to the environment whilst maintaining or increasing farm profitability. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of stacking different combinations of five N leaching mitigation strategies within the whole farm system; 1) reduced N fertilizer input, 2) off-paddock infrastructure, 3) recycling N by growing maize silage on a dedicated area on the farm using effluent as a fertilizer source followed by a catch-crop, 4) dietary salt supplementation to dilute urinary N, and 5) applying a nitrification inhibitor (NI) to slow the release of nitrate in the soil. The reference point (baseline) was a typical current dairy farm (CF) system in the Waikato region of New Zealand. We modelled four Future Farm scenarios by stacking mitigation strategies as follows: baseline plus reduced N fertilizer input, reduced stocking rate, and off-paddock infrastructure (FF); FF plus a dedicated maize block (FFP); FFP plus dietary salt (FFPS); and FFPS plus NI (FFPSNI). These systems were modelled using the Whole Farm Model coupled with the Urine Patch Framework, and APSIM models, using observed climate and economic input data over five consecutive years from 2013-2018. Relative to CF, the FF system achieved a N leaching reduction of 31% with a reduction in profit of 16%. The FFP system had a smaller N leaching reduction (22%), but the reduction in profit was smaller (11%). The fully stacked system (FFPSNI) demonstrated the largest leaching reduction of 33%, but also the largest profit reduction of 27%, compared with the CF. Stacking these five N mitigation strategies can achieve substantial N leaching reductions at the farm-scale. Including a dedicated, effluent-fertilized maize block followed by a catch-crop as part of the stack can reduce the negative impact on profitability but has a trade-off in N leaching. Farmers will have to weigh up these compromises between profit and leaching, considering risk factors not modelled here.
未来以牧草为基础的奶牛场的氮减排堆叠策略:对沥滤和利润的影响
新西兰以牧场为基础的季节性奶业生产者正在努力减少氮(N)对环境的损失,同时保持或提高牧场的盈利能力。本研究考察了在整个牧场系统中叠加以下五种氮沥滤减缓策略的不同组合的成本效益:1)减少氮肥投入;2)牧场外基础设施;3)通过在牧场的专用区域种植玉米青贮来回收氮,使用污水作为肥料来源,然后再种植追肥作物;4)补充食盐以稀释尿氮,以及 5)应用硝化抑制剂(NI)以减缓土壤中硝酸盐的释放。参考点(基线)是新西兰怀卡托地区当前典型的奶牛场(CF)系统。我们通过堆叠以下减缓策略模拟了四种未来牧场情景:基线加减少氮肥投入、降低放养率和牧场外基础设施(FF);FF 加专用玉米块(FFP);FFP 加日粮盐(FFPS);FFPS 加 NI(FFPSNI)。利用 2013-2018 年连续五年的观测气候和经济输入数据,使用整体农场模型(Whole Farm Model)结合尿片框架(Urine Patch Framework)和 APSIM 模型对这些系统进行了建模。与 CF 系统相比,FF 系统的氮沥滤减少了 31%,利润减少了 16%。全脂系统的氮浸出减少量较小(22%),但利润减少量较小(11%)。与 CF 相比,完全堆叠系统(FFPSNI)的沥滤减少量最大,为 33%,但利润减少量也最大,为 27%。将这五种氮减排策略叠加在一起,可在农场规模上大幅减少氮沥滤。将专用的污水施肥玉米地块和接穗作物作为堆叠的一部分,可以减少对盈利能力的负面影响,但需要在氮沥滤方面做出权衡。农民必须权衡利润与沥滤之间的折衷,同时考虑此处未模拟的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信