Do students carry their home in their pocket?

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Aurore Mroz
{"title":"Do students carry their home in their pocket?","authors":"Aurore Mroz","doi":"10.1075/sar.22018.mro","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This longitudinal mixed methods study followed 16 U.S.-affiliated learners of French in Paris. After merging\n monthly social network and weekly smartphone usage reports, K-means clusters analysis revealed significant differences between (1)\n learners displaying attachment to versus detachment from their friends and family at home, and (2) smartphone usage profiles –\n spectators versus communicators and explorers. Triangulation with pre-/during-/post-study abroad in-depth interviews allowed\n identification of what was most instrumental for participants’ interactions in the target language and intercultural gains:\n geolocation applications on their phones and living with host families. The electronic umbilical cord hypothesized to exist for\n those displaying attachment was in fact not a detrimental force – quite the opposite. Instead, the way participants had\n (detrimentally) taken their home with them to Paris was by being visited by friends and family, by often interacting with U.S.\n students on site, and by frequently consuming English-speaking audiovisual content on their phones.","PeriodicalId":36825,"journal":{"name":"Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education","volume":" 90","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/sar.22018.mro","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This longitudinal mixed methods study followed 16 U.S.-affiliated learners of French in Paris. After merging monthly social network and weekly smartphone usage reports, K-means clusters analysis revealed significant differences between (1) learners displaying attachment to versus detachment from their friends and family at home, and (2) smartphone usage profiles – spectators versus communicators and explorers. Triangulation with pre-/during-/post-study abroad in-depth interviews allowed identification of what was most instrumental for participants’ interactions in the target language and intercultural gains: geolocation applications on their phones and living with host families. The electronic umbilical cord hypothesized to exist for those displaying attachment was in fact not a detrimental force – quite the opposite. Instead, the way participants had (detrimentally) taken their home with them to Paris was by being visited by friends and family, by often interacting with U.S. students on site, and by frequently consuming English-speaking audiovisual content on their phones.
学生会把家装在口袋里吗?
这项纵向混合方法研究跟踪了 16 名在巴黎学习法语的美国学生。在合并了每月的社交网络报告和每周的智能手机使用报告后,K-均值聚类分析揭示了以下两个方面的显著差异:(1) 学习者对国内亲友的依恋与疏远;(2) 智能手机的使用情况--旁观者与交流者和探索者。通过对留学前后和期间的深度访谈进行三角测量,确定了对参与者的目标语言互动和跨文化收获最有帮助的因素:手机上的地理位置应用和与寄宿家庭的共同生活。对于那些表现出依恋的人来说,假设存在的电子脐带实际上并不是一种有害的力量--恰恰相反。相反,参与者(有害地)将他们的家带到巴黎的方式是接受朋友和家人的探访,经常与现场的美国学生互动,以及经常在手机上消费英语视听内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信