Discourses of cultural diversity and inclusion in film policy: The case of Flanders (2002–2022)

Alexander De Man, Gertjan Willems, Daniel Biltereyst
{"title":"Discourses of cultural diversity and inclusion in film policy: The case of Flanders (2002–2022)","authors":"Alexander De Man, Gertjan Willems, Daniel Biltereyst","doi":"10.1177/13675494241228937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines how Flemish film policy actors and industry stakeholders have conceptualized, framed and operationalized cultural diversity and inclusion over the past two decades (2002–2022). Drawing on critical discourse and interpretive policy analysis of policy documents and a series of in-depth expert interviews, we investigate how discourses of diversity in cultural policymaking are consistently shaped by (neo-)liberal continuations of deregulation, state neutrality and marketization. This article identifies three discursive shifts over the years, highlighting their complex tensions with the persistent, liberal-egalitarian principle of difference-blind universalism. Framing these tensions as a major obstacle in achieving a paradigmatic policy shift toward the inclusion of ethnic/diasporic minorities in Flemish cinema, we advance a more comprehensive way of understanding why media diversity policies have, so far, proven inadequate.","PeriodicalId":502446,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cultural Studies","volume":"30 33","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494241228937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines how Flemish film policy actors and industry stakeholders have conceptualized, framed and operationalized cultural diversity and inclusion over the past two decades (2002–2022). Drawing on critical discourse and interpretive policy analysis of policy documents and a series of in-depth expert interviews, we investigate how discourses of diversity in cultural policymaking are consistently shaped by (neo-)liberal continuations of deregulation, state neutrality and marketization. This article identifies three discursive shifts over the years, highlighting their complex tensions with the persistent, liberal-egalitarian principle of difference-blind universalism. Framing these tensions as a major obstacle in achieving a paradigmatic policy shift toward the inclusion of ethnic/diasporic minorities in Flemish cinema, we advance a more comprehensive way of understanding why media diversity policies have, so far, proven inadequate.
电影政策中的文化多样性和包容性论述:佛兰德斯案例(2002-2022 年)
本文探讨了弗拉芒电影政策参与者和产业利益相关者在过去二十年(2002-2022 年)中是如何将文化多样性和包容性概念化、框架化和操作化的。通过对政策文件的批判性话语和解释性政策分析以及一系列深入的专家访谈,我们研究了文化政策制定中的多样性话语是如何被放松管制、国家中立和市场化的(新)自由主义延续所塑造的。本文指出了多年来的三种话语转变,强调了它们与自由主义--平等主义的 "差异-盲目-普遍 "原则之间的复杂矛盾。我们将这些紧张关系视为实现政策范式转变的主要障碍,以实现佛兰德斯电影对少数民族/散居少数民族的包容,从而以一种更全面的方式来理解为什么媒体多样性政策迄今为止仍被证明是不够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信