The effect of permanent protective netting on insect pest prevalence in citrus orchards in South Africa

T. Marsberg, Mellissa Peyper, W. Kirkman, Sean D. Moore, Guy Sutton
{"title":"The effect of permanent protective netting on insect pest prevalence in citrus orchards in South Africa","authors":"T. Marsberg, Mellissa Peyper, W. Kirkman, Sean D. Moore, Guy Sutton","doi":"10.17159/2254-8854/2024/a17244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of protective netting is becoming an increasingly popular practice in the citrus industry in South Africa. However, data on its effects on biotic factors, particularly insect pests, are limited. This study focused on the effect nets have on key citrus pests in the Eastern Cape province. Orchards under nets and open orchards, of similar cultivars, ages and management practices, were monitored at several sites over two seasons for pest infestation and damage. Weekly monitoring was conducted for Thaumatotibia leucotreta infestation. Other pests were monitored either monthly or once a season. During the first season, T. leucotreta infestation was higher in orchards under nets, probably because, unlike the open orchards, the nets provided protection for the existing high levels of T. leucotreta. No T. leucotreta infestation was recorded in both orchard types in 2019. This was due to generally lower than usual pest abundance and dramatically improved area-wide management of T. leucotreta. Pheromone traps were used to monitor T. leucotreta males, including sterile moths used in a sterile insect technique programme. Although higher catches of wild T. leucotreta moths were recorded in orchards under nets, so too were there higher numbers of sterile moths and a higher ratio of sterile to wild moths, indicating the potential for better pest suppression for orchards under nets. Various other key pests were monitored during this time, with variable results for each species. Pests that were elevated under nets include Planococcus citri and Aonidiella aurantii. Pests that seemed to be lower under nets were Ceratitis capitata and Scirtothrips aurantii. Nets had no effect on Empoasca distinguenda, Penthimiola bella and Eriophyes sheldoni. These differences in pest levels in netted and open orchards trigger an important debate on whether nets are beneficial for or detrimental to the successful implementation of an integrated pest management programme.","PeriodicalId":502837,"journal":{"name":"African Entomology","volume":"77 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2254-8854/2024/a17244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of protective netting is becoming an increasingly popular practice in the citrus industry in South Africa. However, data on its effects on biotic factors, particularly insect pests, are limited. This study focused on the effect nets have on key citrus pests in the Eastern Cape province. Orchards under nets and open orchards, of similar cultivars, ages and management practices, were monitored at several sites over two seasons for pest infestation and damage. Weekly monitoring was conducted for Thaumatotibia leucotreta infestation. Other pests were monitored either monthly or once a season. During the first season, T. leucotreta infestation was higher in orchards under nets, probably because, unlike the open orchards, the nets provided protection for the existing high levels of T. leucotreta. No T. leucotreta infestation was recorded in both orchard types in 2019. This was due to generally lower than usual pest abundance and dramatically improved area-wide management of T. leucotreta. Pheromone traps were used to monitor T. leucotreta males, including sterile moths used in a sterile insect technique programme. Although higher catches of wild T. leucotreta moths were recorded in orchards under nets, so too were there higher numbers of sterile moths and a higher ratio of sterile to wild moths, indicating the potential for better pest suppression for orchards under nets. Various other key pests were monitored during this time, with variable results for each species. Pests that were elevated under nets include Planococcus citri and Aonidiella aurantii. Pests that seemed to be lower under nets were Ceratitis capitata and Scirtothrips aurantii. Nets had no effect on Empoasca distinguenda, Penthimiola bella and Eriophyes sheldoni. These differences in pest levels in netted and open orchards trigger an important debate on whether nets are beneficial for or detrimental to the successful implementation of an integrated pest management programme.
永久性防护网对南非柑橘园害虫发生率的影响
在南非的柑橘产业中,使用防护网的做法越来越普遍。然而,有关保护网对生物因素(尤其是害虫)影响的数据却很有限。这项研究的重点是保护网对东开普省主要柑橘害虫的影响。在两个季节里,在几个地点对栽培品种、树龄和管理方法相似的网箱果园和露天果园进行了虫害和损害监测。每周监测 Thaumatibia leucotreta 的虫害情况。其他害虫每月或每季监测一次。在第一季,网箱果园中的褐斑天牛虫害较高,这可能是因为与露天果园不同,网箱为现有的大量褐斑天牛提供了保护。2019 年,两种类型的果园都没有记录到白粉虱侵扰。这是因为害虫数量普遍低于往常,而且全区范围内的白粉虱管理得到了显著改善。信息素诱捕器用于监测白蛾雄虫,包括昆虫不育技术计划中使用的不育蛾。虽然网下果园中野生白蛾的捕获量较高,但不育蛾的数量也较高,不育蛾与野生蛾的比例也较高,这表明网下果园有可能更好地抑制害虫。在此期间,还对其他各种主要害虫进行了监测,结果各不相同。网下虫害较多的害虫包括柠檬扁球菌(Planococcus citri)和金龟子(Aonidiella aurantii)。在蚊帐作用下,害虫数量似乎较少的是帽状角斑病(Ceratitis capitata)和南美蓟马(Scirtothrips aurantii)。网对 Empoasca distinguenda、Penthimiola bella 和 Eriophyes sheldoni 没有影响。在有网果园和无网果园中害虫数量的这些差异引发了一场重要的辩论,讨论网对成功实施害虫综合治理计划是有利还是有害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信