The Impact of Mobility Technicians on Mobility Rates for Hospitalized Adults in a Large Academic Medical Center

Chris L. Wells, Katherine Frampton, Linda B. Horn, Afnan M Gimie, Jason R. Falvey
{"title":"The Impact of Mobility Technicians on Mobility Rates for Hospitalized Adults in a Large Academic Medical Center","authors":"Chris L. Wells, Katherine Frampton, Linda B. Horn, Afnan M Gimie, Jason R. Falvey","doi":"10.1097/jat.0000000000000235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Promotion of early mobility is part of an ongoing effort to mitigate the iatrogenic effects of hospitalization. To assist with mobilization efforts, nursing departments hire mobility technicians (MTs). However, little is known about whether hospital units that hire MTs have increased rates of patient mobilization.\n \n \n \n The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether units in an academic medical setting that hired an MT had greater improvements in mobility compared with similar units that did not hire an MT.\n \n \n \n Two levels of care-matched pairs of hospital units were used for this analysis. Within each pairing, one unit hired an MT. We captured activity days, defined as any documented out-of-bed activity in a 24-hour period, from standardized documentation. A monthly activity rate was calculated for each unit as the average daily percentage of patients who had out-of-bed orders. A difference-in-difference generalized linear model with a time-by-MT interaction, weighted for patient volume, was used to compare the relative improvement in mobility 6 months prior (baseline) to the hiring of an MT to periods 3 and 6 months post-hire.\n \n \n \n There was a 2.3% absolute increase in activity rate from preperiod to the 3-month postperiod for units that hired an MT, as compared with a 5.1% decline in similar units that did not have an MT. This 8.4% difference in activity rates was statistically significant (P = .03). Over 6 months, the effects of the program waned. Control units continued to decline with a 7.1% drop from baseline) compared with a marginal 0.1% increase in activity rates for units with an MT from baseline. This relative 7.6% increase in mobility was not significant (P = .13).\n \n \n \n There was a significant improvement in activity rates associated with MT hire that declined over time. These results may be contributed to a nonstructured MT utilization, variability with nursing education on the role of the MT, and staffing challenges that diverted the use of the MT to nonmobility activities.\n","PeriodicalId":505048,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","volume":"91 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jat.0000000000000235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Promotion of early mobility is part of an ongoing effort to mitigate the iatrogenic effects of hospitalization. To assist with mobilization efforts, nursing departments hire mobility technicians (MTs). However, little is known about whether hospital units that hire MTs have increased rates of patient mobilization. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether units in an academic medical setting that hired an MT had greater improvements in mobility compared with similar units that did not hire an MT. Two levels of care-matched pairs of hospital units were used for this analysis. Within each pairing, one unit hired an MT. We captured activity days, defined as any documented out-of-bed activity in a 24-hour period, from standardized documentation. A monthly activity rate was calculated for each unit as the average daily percentage of patients who had out-of-bed orders. A difference-in-difference generalized linear model with a time-by-MT interaction, weighted for patient volume, was used to compare the relative improvement in mobility 6 months prior (baseline) to the hiring of an MT to periods 3 and 6 months post-hire. There was a 2.3% absolute increase in activity rate from preperiod to the 3-month postperiod for units that hired an MT, as compared with a 5.1% decline in similar units that did not have an MT. This 8.4% difference in activity rates was statistically significant (P = .03). Over 6 months, the effects of the program waned. Control units continued to decline with a 7.1% drop from baseline) compared with a marginal 0.1% increase in activity rates for units with an MT from baseline. This relative 7.6% increase in mobility was not significant (P = .13). There was a significant improvement in activity rates associated with MT hire that declined over time. These results may be contributed to a nonstructured MT utilization, variability with nursing education on the role of the MT, and staffing challenges that diverted the use of the MT to nonmobility activities.
移动技术员对一家大型学术医疗中心住院成人移动率的影响
促进早期移动是减轻住院的先天性影响的持续努力的一部分。为了协助移动工作,护理部门会雇佣移动技术人员(MTs)。然而,对于聘用移动技术员的医院科室是否会提高患者移动率,人们却知之甚少。 这项回顾性研究旨在确定,与未聘用移动技术员的类似科室相比,聘用移动技术员的学术医疗机构科室在移动能力方面是否有更大的改善。 这项分析使用了两对医疗水平相匹配的医院单位。每个配对中都有一个单位聘用了 MT。我们从标准化文档中获取了活动天数,即 24 小时内任何有记录的床外活动。我们计算出了每个单位的月活动率,即有床外活动指令的病人的日平均百分比。我们使用了一个具有时间与 MT 交互作用的差分广义线性模型,并对患者数量进行了加权,以比较聘用 MT 前 6 个月(基线)与聘用后 3 个月和 6 个月期间流动性的相对改善情况。 聘用了医疗辅助人员的科室,从聘用前到聘用后 3 个月的活动率绝对值增加了 2.3%,而没有聘用医疗辅助人员的同类科室则下降了 5.1%。8.4% 的活动率差异具有统计学意义(P = .03)。6 个月后,该计划的效果逐渐减弱。对照组的活动率继续下降,与基线相比下降了 7.1%,而有 MT 的单位的活动率与基线相比仅略微增加了 0.1%。流动性相对增加的 7.6% 并不显著(P = .13)。 随着时间的推移,与 MT 雇用相关的活动率有了明显的改善。造成这些结果的原因可能包括:MT的使用没有结构化、关于MT作用的护理教育存在差异,以及人员配置方面的挑战将MT的使用转移到了非移动性活动上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信