Mengukur Kualitas Layanan Perpustakaan Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al-Washliyah Medan Menggunakan Metode Libqual

ARZUSIN Pub Date : 2024-02-13 DOI:10.58578/arzusin.v4i2.2717
Julviana Puspita Sari, Retno Sayekti, Khairul Jamil
{"title":"Mengukur Kualitas Layanan Perpustakaan Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al-Washliyah Medan Menggunakan Metode Libqual","authors":"Julviana Puspita Sari, Retno Sayekti, Khairul Jamil","doi":"10.58578/arzusin.v4i2.2717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research discusses measuring the quality of library services at the Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah University of Medan using the Libqual method. The aim of the research is to determine the service quality of the Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah Medan University Library based on three libqual dimensions, namely Affect of Service, Information Control and Library as Place. This type of research is quantitative research with a descriptive approach. The data collection technique in this research was carried out through distributing questionnaires. The sample in this study was 3,159 users of the Nusantara Al Washliyah Medan Muslim University Library from 2021, who were limited using the Slovin formula, so the number of respondents was 97 people. The sampling technique in this research used non-random accidental sampling. The results of this research show that service quality is based on the Affect of Service aspect, users are quite satisfied with the quality of library services or have met the minimum expectations of users with a positive adequancy gap (AG) at a score of 0.03 and the quality of library services is considered good but has not met ideal expectations. what the user wants or is in the tolerance zone with the superiority gap (SG) being negative at a score of -1.01. Based on the Information Control aspect, users are quite satisfied with the quality of library services or have met the minimum expectations of users with a positive adequancy gap (AG) at a score of 0.05 and the quality of library services is considered good but has not met the ideal expectations desired by users or is in the tolerance zone with the superiority gap (SG) being negative at a score of -1.07. Based on the Library as Place aspect, users are quite satisfied with the quality of library services or have met the minimum expectations of users with a positive adequancy gap (AG) at a score of 0.16 and the quality of library services is considered good but has not met the ideal expectations desired by users or is in the zone tolerance with superiority gap (SG) is negative at a score of -1.11.","PeriodicalId":505425,"journal":{"name":"ARZUSIN","volume":"13 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARZUSIN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58578/arzusin.v4i2.2717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research discusses measuring the quality of library services at the Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah University of Medan using the Libqual method. The aim of the research is to determine the service quality of the Muslim Nusantara Al Washliyah Medan University Library based on three libqual dimensions, namely Affect of Service, Information Control and Library as Place. This type of research is quantitative research with a descriptive approach. The data collection technique in this research was carried out through distributing questionnaires. The sample in this study was 3,159 users of the Nusantara Al Washliyah Medan Muslim University Library from 2021, who were limited using the Slovin formula, so the number of respondents was 97 people. The sampling technique in this research used non-random accidental sampling. The results of this research show that service quality is based on the Affect of Service aspect, users are quite satisfied with the quality of library services or have met the minimum expectations of users with a positive adequancy gap (AG) at a score of 0.03 and the quality of library services is considered good but has not met ideal expectations. what the user wants or is in the tolerance zone with the superiority gap (SG) being negative at a score of -1.01. Based on the Information Control aspect, users are quite satisfied with the quality of library services or have met the minimum expectations of users with a positive adequancy gap (AG) at a score of 0.05 and the quality of library services is considered good but has not met the ideal expectations desired by users or is in the tolerance zone with the superiority gap (SG) being negative at a score of -1.07. Based on the Library as Place aspect, users are quite satisfied with the quality of library services or have met the minimum expectations of users with a positive adequancy gap (AG) at a score of 0.16 and the quality of library services is considered good but has not met the ideal expectations desired by users or is in the zone tolerance with superiority gap (SG) is negative at a score of -1.11.
使用利伯夸尔法衡量棉兰穆斯林大学图书馆的服务质量
本研究讨论了使用 Libqual 方法衡量棉兰穆斯林大学图书馆服务质量的问题。研究的目的是根据三个 Libqual 维度(即服务效果、信息控制和图书馆作为场所)确定棉兰穆斯林大学图书馆的服务质量。本研究属于定量研究,采用描述性方法。本研究的数据收集技术通过发放调查问卷的方式进行。本研究的样本为 2021 年以来棉兰穆斯林大学图书馆的 3159 名用户,使用斯洛文公式对这些用户进行了限制,因此受访者人数为 97 人。本研究的抽样技术采用了非随机意外抽样。研究结果表明,从服务效果(Affect of Service)方面来看,用户对图书馆的服务质量比较满意,或者说达到了用户的最低期望值,充分性差距(AG)为正,得分为 0.03;图书馆的服务质量被认为是好的,但没有达到用户的理想期望值,用户的期望值为负,优越性差距(SG)为负,得分为-1.01。从信息控制方面来看,用户对图书馆服务质量相当满意,或达到了用户的最低期望值,适当性差距(AG)为正值,得分为 0.05;图书馆服务质量被视为良好,但没有达到用户的理想期望值,或处于容忍区,优越性差距(SG)为负值,得分为-1.07。在 "图书馆作为场所 "方面,用户对图书馆服务质量相当满意,或已达到用户的最低期望,适当性差距(AG)为正值,得分为 0.16;图书馆服务质量被认为是良好的,但未达到用户的理想期望,或处于容忍区,优越性差距(SG)为负值,得分为-1.11。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信