Small area estimates for Voting Rights Act Section 203(b) coverage determinations

Eric Slud, Carolina Franco, Adam Hall
{"title":"Small area estimates for Voting Rights Act Section 203(b) coverage determinations","authors":"Eric Slud, Carolina Franco, Adam Hall","doi":"10.1177/00080683231215985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Director of the US Census Bureau every five years, under the Voting Rights Act (VRA) Section 203(b), determines which states and political subdivisions must provide ballot assistance in languages other than English. These rule-based determinations use small-area estimates of the proportions of voting-age citizen members of racial/ethnic Language Minority Groups (LMGs) who are limited Englishproficient (LEP) and of LEP LMG persons who are also illiterate. This large-scale Small Area Estimation (SAE) effort by the US Census Bureau is based on American Community Survey five-year data. This paper focuses on the unique attributes of this SAE problem, including the predominance in each LMG of tiny domains along with relatively few large domains that account for the bulk of LMG citizens. The data and small area models are treated separately for distinct LMGs, and the spirit of the law requires that the domain estimates should be produced in a similar way across LMGs for each type of geography (Jurisdictions, which are mostly counties, plus two types of American Indian and Alaskan Native areas). The paper describes and assesses the SAE models developed under unique constraints, including novel methodological aspects and the use of hybrid frequentist and Bayesian computational techniques; situates these modelling choices in the broader literature on SAE; and discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the resulting models.","PeriodicalId":396326,"journal":{"name":"Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin","volume":"141 47","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00080683231215985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Director of the US Census Bureau every five years, under the Voting Rights Act (VRA) Section 203(b), determines which states and political subdivisions must provide ballot assistance in languages other than English. These rule-based determinations use small-area estimates of the proportions of voting-age citizen members of racial/ethnic Language Minority Groups (LMGs) who are limited Englishproficient (LEP) and of LEP LMG persons who are also illiterate. This large-scale Small Area Estimation (SAE) effort by the US Census Bureau is based on American Community Survey five-year data. This paper focuses on the unique attributes of this SAE problem, including the predominance in each LMG of tiny domains along with relatively few large domains that account for the bulk of LMG citizens. The data and small area models are treated separately for distinct LMGs, and the spirit of the law requires that the domain estimates should be produced in a similar way across LMGs for each type of geography (Jurisdictions, which are mostly counties, plus two types of American Indian and Alaskan Native areas). The paper describes and assesses the SAE models developed under unique constraints, including novel methodological aspects and the use of hybrid frequentist and Bayesian computational techniques; situates these modelling choices in the broader literature on SAE; and discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the resulting models.
投票权利法》第 203(b)条覆盖范围确定的小地区估计数
根据《投票权法》(VRA)第 203(b)条的规定,美国人口普查局局长每五年确定一次哪些州和政治分支机构必须以英语以外的语言提供选票协助。这些基于规则的决定使用的是对种族/民族语言少数群体 (LMGs) 中达到投票年龄的公民中英语水平有限 (LEP) 者和同时也是文盲的 LEP LMG 人士所占比例的小地区估算。美国人口普查局的这项大规模小地区估算(SAE)工作以美国社区调查五年期数据为基础。本文的重点是这一 SAE 问题的独特属性,包括每个 LMG 都以小区域为主,而占 LMG 公民主体的大区域相对较少。数据和小地区模型针对不同的 LMG 分别处理,而法律的精神要求每种地理类型(辖区,主要是县,加上两种类型的美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民地区)的地区估算应以类似的方式在不同的 LMG 中产生。本文描述并评估了在独特限制条件下开发的 SAE 模型,包括新颖的方法论方面以及混合频数主义和贝叶斯计算技术的使用;将这些建模选择置于有关 SAE 的更广泛文献中;并讨论了由此产生的模型的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信