Salient features and ecosystem services of tree species in mountainous indigenous agroforestry systems of North-Eastern Tanzania

Oforo Didas Kimaro, Ellen Desie, D. Kimaro, K. Vancampenhout, K. Feger
{"title":"Salient features and ecosystem services of tree species in mountainous indigenous agroforestry systems of North-Eastern Tanzania","authors":"Oforo Didas Kimaro, Ellen Desie, D. Kimaro, K. Vancampenhout, K. Feger","doi":"10.3389/ffgc.2023.1082864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indigenous agroforestry systems in tropical mountainous environments provide crucial ecosystem services, but these ecosystems are also facing some challenges. A loss of diversity and native tree species in the overstory layer has been a growing concern in agroforestry worldwide, yet the drivers behind it remain inadequately understood. We hypothesize that the choice of overstory tree species is closely linked to the ecosystem services required by farmers, their livelihood strategy, and the salient features of each system. We, therefore, investigated four different farming systems in the mountains of northeastern Tanzania, i.e., the Kihamba on Mt. Kilimanjaro, Ginger agroforestry in the South Pare mountains, and Miraba and Mixed spices agroforestry in the West and East Usambara. In 82 farms, we collected data on the structure, tree species composition (both native and non-native), diversity, and associated provisioning ecosystem services as identified by smallholder farmers. Our results indicate that although all studied systems are multi-layered with three or four vertical layers, they have notable differences in their salient features concerning structure, composition, and diversity. The unique climate, landscape setting, soil, historical background, and economic opportunities that exist in each region contribute to those differences. Our findings indicate that the Kihamba system had the highest number of native tree species, and the largest diversity in species used for provisioning services, followed by Ginger agroforestry. No native species were used in Miraba or Mixed spices agroforestry, where a limited number of non-native tree species are planted mainly for fuel and timber or as a crop, respectively. Our findings regarding reported provisioning ES corroborate our hypothesis and imply that policies to increase resilience and restore the native tree species cover of the agroforestry systems of Tanzania can only be successful if knowledge of the ES potential of native species is increased, and interventions are tailored to each system’s ES needs for conservation as well as livelihood.","PeriodicalId":507254,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","volume":"44 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1082864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indigenous agroforestry systems in tropical mountainous environments provide crucial ecosystem services, but these ecosystems are also facing some challenges. A loss of diversity and native tree species in the overstory layer has been a growing concern in agroforestry worldwide, yet the drivers behind it remain inadequately understood. We hypothesize that the choice of overstory tree species is closely linked to the ecosystem services required by farmers, their livelihood strategy, and the salient features of each system. We, therefore, investigated four different farming systems in the mountains of northeastern Tanzania, i.e., the Kihamba on Mt. Kilimanjaro, Ginger agroforestry in the South Pare mountains, and Miraba and Mixed spices agroforestry in the West and East Usambara. In 82 farms, we collected data on the structure, tree species composition (both native and non-native), diversity, and associated provisioning ecosystem services as identified by smallholder farmers. Our results indicate that although all studied systems are multi-layered with three or four vertical layers, they have notable differences in their salient features concerning structure, composition, and diversity. The unique climate, landscape setting, soil, historical background, and economic opportunities that exist in each region contribute to those differences. Our findings indicate that the Kihamba system had the highest number of native tree species, and the largest diversity in species used for provisioning services, followed by Ginger agroforestry. No native species were used in Miraba or Mixed spices agroforestry, where a limited number of non-native tree species are planted mainly for fuel and timber or as a crop, respectively. Our findings regarding reported provisioning ES corroborate our hypothesis and imply that policies to increase resilience and restore the native tree species cover of the agroforestry systems of Tanzania can only be successful if knowledge of the ES potential of native species is increased, and interventions are tailored to each system’s ES needs for conservation as well as livelihood.
坦桑尼亚东北部山区本土农林系统中树种的显著特征和生态系统服务
热带山区环境中的本土农林系统提供了重要的生态系统服务,但这些生态系统也面临着一些挑战。顶层树种多样性和本地树种的丧失已成为全球农林业日益关注的问题,但人们对其背后的驱动因素仍缺乏足够的了解。我们假设,上层树种的选择与农民所需的生态系统服务、他们的生计策略以及每个系统的显著特征密切相关。因此,我们在坦桑尼亚东北部山区调查了四种不同的农耕系统,即乞力马扎罗山上的基汉巴、南帕雷山区的生姜农林业以及西乌桑巴拉和东乌桑巴拉的米拉巴和混合香料农林业。在 82 个农场中,我们收集了有关结构、树种组成(包括本地树种和非本地树种)、多样性以及由小农确定的相关生态系统服务供应的数据。我们的研究结果表明,尽管所有研究的系统都是多层次的,有三层或四层垂直层,但它们在结构、组成和多样性方面的显著特征却有明显差异。每个地区独特的气候、地貌环境、土壤、历史背景和经济机遇造成了这些差异。我们的研究结果表明,基汉巴系统中本地树种的数量最多,用于提供服务的树种的多样性最大,其次是金格农林业。米拉巴农林业和混合香料农林业没有使用本地树种,它们种植了数量有限的非本地树种,主要用作燃料和木材或作物。我们关于提供 ES 的研究结果证实了我们的假设,并意味着只有增加对本地树种 ES 潜力的了解,并根据每个系统对保护和生计 ES 的需求采取干预措施,提高坦桑尼亚农林系统的复原力和恢复本地树种覆盖率的政策才能取得成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信